| 汉语副词“都”可以分红表总括的规模副词和表语气的语气副词两种。本文在后人研究的基本上，对规模副词“都1”和语气副词“都2”的句法、语义、语用上的特色及每一个义项之间的内涵接洽等停止周全、具体地商量。重要评论辩论内容以下。起首，韩语论文题目，把副词“都”的研究现状分红义项数目、界说成绩、语义指向及语用制约四个方面停止梳理和归结，并指出今朝对副词“都”研究中存在的缺乏的地方。古代汉语八百词等许多论著把副词“都”释义为规模副词、语气副词和时光副词三种。然则，时光副词“都：；”所表现的已然义其实不是“都”自己的，而是在经常使用句“都……了”中的“了”所带来的构造意义，应当把它归入语气副词。规模副词“都1”为全称量化词，对其后面的单数事物停止全称量化。然则与其他典范的全称量词分歧，它还具有分派功效。即后面的NP规模外面的每个成员无一破例地具有VP的性质或介入VP行动。是以，它可以和其他全称量词共现。“都1”的周延性质，还招致了它不克不及与关系名词共现等一些制约。对于“都。”的语义指向成绩，经由过程预设和变换剖析，韩语论文网站，得出了“都1”只能指向后面的成份，不克不及指向前面。“都1”的感化对象NP为单数式和双数式两可。在NP是双数情势时，可以朋分成更小的单元的NP才可以用“都1”量化。有时，“都1”的感化对象可以不涌现，而隐含在措辞人的预设中。“都1”还遭到语用上的制约。就NP而言，必定是措辞人客观认定的表年夜量的词；表现定指、不定指和无指的NP都可以成为“都1”的量化对象。就VP而言，“都1”请求必定是一个可以反复或连续的。除此以外，“都1”对“量”的请求异样作用到VP上，请求举措的量多。不管是NP照样VP，“量多”就是决议可否跟“都1”共现的症结。语气副词“都2”重要兼有表现语气和总括的两种功效。“都：”重在表现语气，但必定水平上还保存着表总括的功效。语气副词“都”与“都1”分歧，强调其后面和前面两可。这些强调对象都是表极性的，即语用分级中居于最高端或最低真个成份。在确定式里，强调对象为最高真个成份；在否认式里，则是最低真个成份。“都2”除表现语气，还表现“其他的也是如斯”的意思。本文还从语法化的角度考核“都”的各项之间的内涵接洽和语气副词“都：，”与“都2”之间的差别停止初步的商量。“都”演化进程为“规模副词“都1”→语气副词“都2”→语气副词“都3”。表现语气的“都2和“都3”之间也有较年夜的差别。“都2”兼有表现总括和语气两个功效，“都3”则完整掉去总括功效，重要表现“措辞人处境的非普通性”的语气。其演化进程遵照“由实转虚，由虚变得更虚”的语法化的广泛纪律。本文还对副词“都”在韩语中的对应情形作比拟研究，找出二者之间的差异。规模副词“都，”在韩语中普通用“(？)(da/modu)(都)”来表达。二者之间最年夜的差别有二：一是汉语副词“都1”可以涌现在统指、逐指、任指三种情形。韩语副词“(？)(da/modu)“只能和表现统指的词共现。二是“都1”是在句中必弗成少的，“(？)”则是无关紧要的。语气副词“都2”在韩语中可以用“(？)(dO)”来表达。二者都是经由过程对极性成份的描写，表现“其他的也是如斯”的语气。语气副词“都3”可以用“(？)(da/modu)”来表达。这些纰谬称重要是韩语中实词的感化、分歧文明配景招致的说话习气的分歧等身分所惹起的。 Abstract: Chinese Adverb "dou" dividends scale blanket and table tone adverb adverb two. The later research, the connotation of scale Adverbs "1" and the Adverb "2" syntactic, semantic and pragmatic features and every items between approached to conduct a comprehensive and detailed plans. Comment on the following important content. First and foremost, the adverbs "are" the research status of the bonus items number, defined performance, semantic pointing and pragmatic control four aspects of sorted and concluded, and pointed out that the current of the Adverb "dou" in the study of the existing lack of place. "Ancient Chinese eight hundred word" and many other works for the size of the Adverb "dou" adverbs, modal adverbs and adverbs of time three. However, the time adverb ";" by the performance is actually not meaning "all" of their own, but in the words "are often used...... The tectonic significance "in the" "brings, should put it into adverbs. The size of the Adverb "1" word for universal quantification, singular things behind the stop of universal quantification. But the universal quantifier and other types of differences, it also has distribution effect. Each member of the NP scale outside without exception with the nature of VP or VP in action. So it can be other quantifier co-occurrence. "1" the comprehensive nature, it cannot be incurred and the relationship between noun co-occurrence and some other constraints. "All about." The semantic analysis of presupposition and achievements, through the process of transformation, the "1" can only point behind the ingredients, not pointing to the front. "Affect the object NP 1" is singular and dual type 2. NP is even in the situation, can be divided into smaller units of NP can only be used "1" quantization. Sometimes, "1" the role of object can not appear, but implicit in the default language. "1" is also restricted by the pragmatics. NP, a large number of people must be the table wording objectively recognized words; definite, indefinite performance and no means NP can become "quantitative object 1". VP, "1" request must be a repeated or continuous. In addition, the "1" request also influence on the "quantity" to the VP, the amount of the move request. Whether it is NP or VP, the "quantity" is to decide whether "1" is the crux of the problem. The Adverb "2" has the important manifestations of mood and sum up two kinds of effect. "All" focuses on the performance of the tone, but also kept up to a certain level in the function table. The Adverb "dou" and "1" differences, emphasizing its back and front two. These objects are stressed table polarity, i.e. the pragmatic classification is the most high-end or lowest really components. In determining the type, the highest component really emphasize the object; in denying type, is really the lowest component. "2" in addition to the performance of the tone, "the other is also so.". The paper also approached the connotation from the perspective of grammaticalization assessment "all" and the Adverb "are:" 2 "and" the difference between the preliminary discuss. "" evolution "," 1 "scale adverb adverb" 2 "," 3 tone adverb". The performance of "2 tone" and 3 "have a big difference. "2" both the performance of the blanket and two tone effect, "3" is complete off to blanket effect, an important manifestation of the wording of the situation of non ordinary "tone. The evolution process in accordance with the "by turning, wide discipline of grammaticalization from virtual become more virtual". The Adverb "dou" in Korean in the corresponding situation of comparative study, find out the similarities and differences between the two. The size of the Adverb "," ordinary "(in Korean? ) (da/modu) (all) "to express. The biggest difference between the two has two: one is the Chinese Adverb "1" can refer to, by Chung now refers to any means, three kinds of situations. Korean adverb "(? ) (da/modu) "and the only performance refers to the word co-occurrence. The two is "1" is indispensable in the sentence, "(? ) "is of no great importance. The Adverb "2" in Korean can be used "(? ) (dO) "to express. The two is through the process of the polar component description, "as well as other" tone. The Adverb "3" can be used "(? ) (da/modu) "to express. These PI paradox says is incurred by the notional words in Korean action, different civilization with King speaking habits differences copious branch cause. 目录: |
