| 神态是一个泛说话的概念，表现措辞人对句子所表达的命题或命题所描述的情境的不雅点或立场，韩语论文范文，与措辞人的客观性有关。本文彩用神态最普遍的分类将其分为两年夜类一认知神态和责任神态，在此分类基本上，比较考核属于认知神态的韩汉推想神态表达措施。韩国语属黏着语系统，有很蓬勃的词尾系统表达语法概念，所以可以或许表达推想神态的情势也有许多种。重要有先语末词尾、语末词尾、辞汇(副词/动词)、习用型[一((？))(？)/(？)/((？))(？)，一((？))(？)/(？)/((？))(？)，一((？))(？)/(？)/(？)……]等，个中最经常使用的是先语末词尾‘一(？)一’和各类习用型。习用型普通由“冠形词形词尾/依存名词/谓语”情势组成。在韩国语中，表达推想神态意义时运用最普遍、功效意义最类似的是先语末词尾‘一(？)一’和习用型‘一(旦)(？)’。所以本文拔取了两者作为研究韩国语中推想神态的代表。与韩语分歧，汉语属孤立语系统，没有词形的变更而且重要经由过程语序来表达语法关系。这决议了汉语在表达推想神态时手腕绝对单一，重要依附神态动词、语气副词、语气助词等来措施完成，个中运用最多确当属神态动词。汉语中表达推想神态意义的神态动词重要有“能，可以，会，得(dei)，要，该，应当，能够”等。本文拔取了推想神态意义最为显著、意义功效最为类似，且与韩语的先语末词尾‘一(？)一’和习用型‘一((？))(？)’构成对比的“会、要、能够”为研究对象，剖析其推想意义，与韩国语推想神态停止比较。本文拔取韩中推想神态表示中的代表形状，对它们的意义功效和制约情势停止考核，比较两种说话在推想神态意义的雷同点与分歧点。以期能对韩中说话学的比较研究、和针对韩国人的对外汉语教授教养或针对中国人的韩国语教授教养有必定的指点意义。论文重要内容以下：第一章中论述研究目标、研究意义，提出研究对象并停止了响应的论文综述。第二章中起首考核了神态、神态的分类根据、推想神态的意义。接着分离整顿了韩中表现推想的神态表示并指出了了本文研究对象所属的神态分类。第三章中考核了韩国语‘一(？)一’和‘一((？))(？)’的神态意义，特殊是推想神态意义，并剖析了两者的推想神态意义制约前提。第四章中考核了汉语“会，免费韩语论文，要，能够”各类的神态意义特殊是推想神态意义，在此基本上对韩中推想神态停止了比较。第五章对本文停止了总结。 Abstract: Expression is a universal concept, expressing the opinion or position of the sentence which is expressed by a sentence or a proposition, and is related to the objectivity of the language. The color expression for the most common classification will be classified as two of the eve of the class a cognitive demeanor and responsible manner, this classification, assessment belongs to cognitive manner of Chinese and Korean suppose expressions method. Korean is an agglutinative language system, a very vigorous suffix system to express the concept of the grammar, so can perhaps expressed reasoned that expression of the situation, there are many kinds of. There is important at the end of the first language, language, vocabulary at the end (adverb / verb), a conventional type [((? ())? (/)? (?) ())? ), (()? ())? (/)? (?) ())? ), (()? ())? (/)? (/)? )...... So, the most often used is at the end of the first language "(? A ") and all kinds of conventional type. The conventional type by the general situation crown word suffix / noun / verb dependency ". In Korean, that was the most common expression meaning, meaning the most similar application is at the end of the first language "(? A) "and" a conventional type (Dan) (? ). So this paper represents both as a research in Korean reasoned demeanor. And Korean differences. Chinese is a isolated language system, does not have the morphological changes and important through the process of word order to express grammatical relations. The resolution of the Chinese in expression suppose the demeanor when wrist absolutely single, important dependent manner verbs, adverbs, tone auxiliary method to complete, medium application most quedang genus manner verbs. Chinese expression suppose demeanor manner verbs important "can, can, and will, too (DEI), to, the, ought to,". This paper has reasoned that the most significant meaning, meaning expression function the most similar, and Korean at the end of the first language "(? A) "and" a conventional type ((? ())? 'to make a contrast of ", to" as the research object, analyze its supposed significance, and Korean reasoned manner to stop comparing. This paper selects Korea supposed expression in the shape of the representatives and their significance efficacy and restrict the situation to stop the assessment, comparison of two kinds of languages in the supposed expression significance of similarities and differences. In order to be able to Korea and learning to speak comparative study, and for Korean foreign language teaching or for Chinese Korean teaching has certain directive significance. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first chapter discusses the research object, the research significance, the research object and the response. The second chapter first examines the manner, according to the classification of air, meaning that way. Then the performance that the rectification separation of Korean expression and pointed out that the expression classification of this research object belongs to the. The third chapter examines "(a Korean? ) one 'and' one (()? ())? The expression of meaning, special) "was supposed to air meaning, and analyzes the significance that the air condition. In the fourth chapter, assessment of the Chinese ", it is necessary to" all expression meaning special was supposed to expression meaning. On this basis, to Korea supposed manner compare. In the fifth chapter, the summary of this article is summarized. 目录: |
