| 从1961年朱德熙师长教师的说“的”开端,学术界对于汉语中“的”字词组的研究可谓百花怒放,百花齐放。但是,半个多世纪曩昔了,学者们对“的”字词组的句法位置及句法特点仍难杀青共鸣,且对“的”字的句法说明年夜都逗留在语义学的层面。可喜的是,在相伴而行的半个多世纪里,乔姆斯基的生成语法也获得了长足的成长,这为汉语的句法研究指清楚明了一条新的途径。另外,在生成语法近期的实际成长阶段,人们曾经充足认识到分句与名词性词组之间的平行关系,这又为汉语名词性词组的研究发明了有益前提。本文旨在应用生成语法的最新结果——语段实际来研究汉语的“的”字构造,重点评论辩论“的”字词组中的一切格构造[NP的XP],以期给“的”字构造的研究带来新的思绪。本文重要经由过程以下几个不雅点睁开：(1)汉语中有很多分歧的“的”,固然它们具有雷同的文字情势与语音情势,然则它们岂论在句法层面照样语义层面都是完整分歧的,是以用一个同一的办法来剖析是弗成行的；(2)汉语的“的”字一切格构造与小句的句法构造具有高度的同一性,“的”字词组自己是一个名词性投射DP,与小句中的CP绝对应,“的”字引诱一个自力的投射FP,与小句中的TP绝对应；(3)FP是一个具有典范名词性特点的投射,中间F(即一切格构造中的“的”字)选择一个异样具著名词性的nP作为它的补足语(complement),而且“的”的句法地位是介于DP与nP中央；(4)n选择一个具著名词性的词组NP作为它的补足语,且“的”字词组中存在一个隐性的n作为名词性转换机制,能将非名词性的词组XP转化为名词性的NP,以便被n所选择；(5)与动词词组一样,汉语名词一切格构造中也具有至多两个语段,即*DP-FP-*nP-NP。最初,本文试图经由过程应用语段实际来对汉语及其他几种说话的一切格构造停止句法剖析,如日语,英语,韩语,和土耳其语等,以期对应用生成语法实际研究汉语起到抛砖引玉的感化。但是,名词性研究毕竟是个很深的学问,在这无限的篇幅中,依然有很多成绩没有触及或处理,还需在将来停止更深刻地商量与研究。 Abstract: From the beginning of 1961 Zhu Dexi teachers "" "", academic circles about Chinese "" word group research can be described as flowers in full bloom, let a hundred flowers blossom. However, more than half a century in the past, the scholars of "of" words and phrases syntactic position and the syntactic features of the is still hard to wrap resonance and of "word" syntax that mostly stay at the level of semantics. It is gratifying that, in the accompanying half a century, Chomsky's generative grammar has also gained considerable growth, which is a new way for Chinese syntax research. Also in the generative grammar of a recent actual growth stage, people have had enough to recognize the relationship between clauses and noun phrases in parallel for the study of Chinese noun phrases are created favorable conditions. This paper aims at using the new results of generative grammar, discourse practice to research on the Chinese "" word structure, key reviews debate "" words and phrases in a precision mitre structure [NP XP], bring new ideas in order to study "and" the word structure. 本文重要经由过程以下几个不雅点睁开：(1)汉语中有很多分歧的“的”,固然它们具有雷同的文字情势与语音情势,然则它们岂论在句法层面照样语义层面都是完整分歧的,是以用一个同一的办法来剖析是弗成行的；(2)汉语的“的”字一切格构造与小句的句法构造具有高度的同一性,“的”字词组自己是一个名词性投射DP,与小句中的CP绝对应,“的”字引诱一个自力的投射FP,与小句中的TP绝对应；(3)FP是一个具有典范名词性特点的投射,中间F(即一切格构造中的“的”字)选择一个异样具著名词性的nP作为它的补足语(complement),而且“的”的句法地位是介于DP与nP中央；(4)n选择 A with the famous speech phrase NP as its complement, and "" words and phrases in existence a recessive n as a noun conversion mechanism, non noun phrase XP transformation in terms of NP to be n; (5) and verb phrases like, Chinese noun a precision mitre structure also has at least two paragraphs, namely *DP-FP-*nP-NP. First, this article attempts to through the process of using discourse practice to speak Chinese and several other precision mitre structure parsing, such as Japanese, English, Korean, and Turkish, in order to use generative grammar practice research on the Chinese to play a valuable role. However, after all, the term research is a very deep knowledge, in this infinite space, there are still many results did not touch or deal with, but also need to be further discussed in the future to discuss. 目录: |
