| 19世纪末至20世纪前半期，日本对韩半岛的侵犯导致浩瀚爱国志士，常识人分开家乡逃往邻近国度中国。满洲与韩半岛交界，不只便利抵达，并且很早就成为抗日活动比拟活泼的地域，比中国其他地域更轻易成为韩国人亡命和移平易近的空间。在这一时代，有过满洲体验的韩国作家经由过程本身的著作描述了满洲和在满洲的中国人，从他者的视野展示出来多种多样的中国抽象。是以韩国作家以满洲体验为题材创作的著作成为国内外学者研究的对象，对懂得他者眼中的中国抽象起到主要感化。然则仅经由过程以满洲体验为素材的著作来掌握中国抽象缺少个性，是以本文将以满洲之外的其他地域为配景创作的著作为研究对象，剖析韩国古代著作中涌现的具有广泛性的中国抽象。19世纪末20世纪初中国开端步入城市化的汗青阶段，而1930年月，中韩两国处在汗青成长的特别时代，不只遭遇内部的侵犯，韩语论文网站，也是以带来了城市化的成长。城市是古代文明的产品，以上海为代表的中国城市对于尚处在前近代社会的韩国来说是一面镜子，它表现的是韩国还没有具有，但又极其神往的古代文明。是以在韩国古代文学著作中，城市也必定成为韩国作家设定的文学空间。20世纪20-40年月韩国文学著作中涌现的中国城市重要有上海，北京，天津，哈尔滨，长春，沈阳，南京等比拟年夜的都会。比来，跟着中韩文学交换的赓续增强，对韩国古代文学著作中涌现的中国抽象的研究也赓续深化，特别是在满朝鲜人对“满洲国”乡村，田主等的研究曾经获得了严重结果。然则，韩语论文范文，不论是在中国照样韩国，对韩国古代文学著作中中国城市抽象的全体研究还有待深化。本文拟经由过程浏览文学著作文本，剖析1930年月韩国文学著作中的中国城市抽象，指出在韩国作家眼中作为他者的中国城市抽象的特色，并联合社会实际，将这一抽象特色与汗青上真实的中国抽象停止比较。以此研讨这一抽象与文本所处的汗青、文明语境的关系，剖析作家对他者的熟悉及发生这类熟悉的缘由。信任经由过程本研究对增强中韩两国文明交换有必定增进感化。 Abstract: In the 19th century to the end of the 20th century before half, Japan for violation of the Korean Peninsula in the vastness of patriots, common sense is left his hometown and fled to the neighboring country of China. At the junction of Manchuria and Korea Peninsula, is not only convenient arrived, and it has long been the Anti Japanese activities compared to active areas, than in other areas of China were more likely to be Korean desperate and plain near the space shift. In this era, the Korean writers who had had the experience of Manchuria have described the Manchuria and Chinese people in Manchuria, from the perspective of the other, from the perspective of the other. Is a Korean writer with the Manchuria experience as the theme of the work has become the subject of domestic and foreign scholars, the understanding of the other in the eyes of the Chinese abstract play a major role. However, only through the process to Manchuria experience for his material to master Chinese abstract lack of personality, is the will to other regions of Manchuria as the background of creation works as the research object, analysis of emerging in ancient Korean literature has a wide range of Chinese abstract. In the late twentieth Century and early nineteenth Century China began to enter the historical stage of urbanization, and 1930 years, China and South Korea in the history of the special era of growth, not only suffered internal violations, but also to bring the growth of urbanization. Cities are the product of ancient civilization, with Shanghai as the representative cities in China about is still in the pre modern society of Korea is a mirror, it is South Korea has not had, but extremely fascinated the ancient civilization. In the ancient Korean literature, the city must be a literary space set by the Korean writers. Twentieth Century 20-40 years of Korean literature, the emergence of Chinese cities in Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Harbin, Changchun, Shenyang,, Nanjing and other large will be compared. Recently, along with the Korean literature exchange continuously strengthened, deepen ceaselessly to emerging in Korean Ancient Literature of Chinese abstract of research, especially in full of the Korean people for "Manchukuo" village, landowners and other research has been serious results. But, whether in China or South Korea, the Chinese city of South Korea's ancient literary works in the abstract of the whole study has yet to be deepened. This paper intends to navigate through literary text, analysis Chinese cities in South Korea literary works in the 1930s abstraction. It is pointed out that in the eyes of the Korean writer as the other cities in China Abstract characteristics, and combined with social actual, the abstract characteristics and history of Chinese abstract compared. This paper discusses the relationship between the abstract and the historical and cultural context of the text, and analyzes the writer's understanding of the other and the reasons for the occurrence of this kind of familiar. Trust through the process of this study to enhance the cultural exchange between China and South Korea has a certain role in promoting. 目录: |
