| 告发作为一种主要的平易近主监视手腕,在袭击守法犯法行动中的主要性愈来愈遭到人们的看重。告发权是宪法付与国民的一项主要平易近主监视权力,是国民、其他小我、单元依法向国度专门机关控诉揭发涉嫌守法背纪犯法行动的权力。落实告发权的行使,保证国民告发权的完成,可以鼓励宽大大众告发的热忱,助于\"对国度机关任务人员等的监视,清除社会不稳固身分,震慑守法犯法,利于对守法背纪犯法行动的查处。韩国2011年制订的公益告发者掩护法在告发者掩护办法、告发法式、告发受理机构等方面停止了明白体系的划定,可操作性强。固然韩国告发者掩护法制纷歧定相符我国告发轨制的客不雅实际,但其告发者掩护的理念及告发者掩护法立法所取得的经历无疑值得我们自创。韩国现行的公益告发轨制司法系统重要包括三部司法即反腐烂法(已废除)、反腐烂和公民权益委员会的设立与运营法(2008年)、公益告发者掩护法(2011年),反腐烂和公民权益委员会的设立与运营法将告发对象限制于公职人员的腐烂行动,具有必定的局限性,而公益告发者掩护法将规模扩展到公、私部分,顺应了社会成长须要,有益于袭击公司等的守法犯法行动。自掩护法公布以来,因为告发者掩护、救援、制约等机制的完美,韩国告发案件的数目翻倍增加,国民更勇于告发,加倍勇于同伤害公共好处的行动作奋斗,对纯粹通明社会风尚的构成施展了严重感化。本文以韩国公益告发者掩护法为视角,对韩国公益告发轨制停止研究。注释总共分为4个章节。第一章对公益告发的概念、特点、公益告发和公益告发轨制的意义、韩国公益告发轨制的发生及公益告发者掩护法的立法过程停止了论述。第二章以该法为视角剖析了韩国告发轨制的框架系统和公益告发轨制的内容,包含告发主体、告发客体、告发措施、告发处置、告发者掩护轨制、赔偿金与救助金轨制。第三章以该法为视角重要阐述了韩国告发轨制存在的成绩与缺乏,包含告发对象的规模、公民权益委员会查询拜访权和监视权的缺掉、告发后的法式成绩和告发者掩护轨制、处分划定的不完美等方面停止了剖析解释。最初,引见了我国告发轨制的树立配景及司法根据,剖析了我国告发轨制存在的成绩,包含没有自力的告发受理机构、缺少标准的告发法式、没有完美的告发机制、告发运转通明度低,缺少有用的监视等等。同时自创韩国公益告发者掩护法的长处与缺乏对完美我国告发轨制提出了本身的意见。第一,我国应制订专门的告发者掩护法,进一步推动告发轨制的法制化、标准化、系统化。第二,设立告发主管机构,并包管其享有自力查询拜访权与监视权的。第三,树立完美的收集告发轨制。第四,履行实名告发,树立严厉的保密轨制。第五,健全告发鼓励和保证轨制。当今我国还没有制订专门的告发者掩护法,而美国、英国、韩国、日本等国度早已出台相干司法,我国告发轨制存在的缺乏制约着告发任务的深刻展开,对于告发的划定不该只散见于各司法学例和一些标准性文件中,制订专门的告发者掩护法,标准告发救援、保证、制约等机制,保证国民告发权力的完成,增强对守法背纪犯法行动的监视,对社会的协调稳固、国民安身立命有侧重年夜意义。而韩国公益告发者掩护法制订了绝对完美的告发轨制,对其停止研究对我国告发轨制的完美有必定的自创意义。 Abstract: As a main means of monitoring and monitoring, the main character of the crime in the crime of attacking the law is more and more valued by people. Report right is the constitution entrusts with the nation's a main plain near the main surveillance powers, national and other individual and unit in accordance with the law complained to the national specialized agencies expose alleged back Ji of abiding by the law crime of power. Implement denounced the right to exercise, to ensure the completion of the national report in the can to encourage broad public report of warmly, help to "of state organ personnel such as surveillance, clear social unstable factors and crime deterrent to obey the law and to investigate the law-abiding discipline back illegal action. South Korea in 2011 to develop the "public information on the protection of the law" in the way of the informant's cover, information on the French, the admissibility of institutions and other aspects of the system to stop the delineation of the clear, workable. Although South Korean prosecutors cover the legal system is consistent with the actual situation of China's system of information on the system, but the idea of the cover of its information and information on the cover of the law made by the legislation is undoubtedly worth our own. Blow the whistle on South Korea's current public rail judicial system important including three judicature is the anti decay law (repealed), the anti rot the rights and interests of the Citizens Committee for the establishment and operation of the law (2008), "public report screen method" (2011), the anticorruption and public rights committee of the establishment and operation of the law would report object limit to the officer of the rotten action, has certain limitations, and the public to report screen method, scale is expanded to public and private parts, conforms to the social development needs, beneficial to attack enterprises law-abiding illegal action. Since the promulgation of the shield law, because to blow the whistle on the screen, rescue, control mechanism perfect, South Korea report cases of double the number increased, people more willing to report, doubling the courage to harm public interest action fight, composition of pure transparent social custom cast serious action. In this paper, the Korean "public welfare information on the screen" as the perspective, the Korean public information system to stop the study. The notes are divided into 4 chapters. In the first chapter, the concept, characteristics, public welfare information and the significance of public interest reporting system, the occurrence of public information system in South Korea and the legislation process of the public welfare information reporting system were discussed. The second chapter to the law from the perspective of analysis of the Korea denounced rail system in the framework of the system and the public report the contents of the rail system, including report subject, object report, report method, blow the whistle on disposal, denounced those who cover rail system, compensation and relief funds rail system. In the third chapter, based on the method from the perspective of important describes the Korea denounced rail of the achievement and deficiency, contains the report object scale, Civil Rights Committee inquiry call lack of rights and the right to monitor, report after the French record and report who cover rail system, punishment to delineate the is not perfect and so on aspect has carried on the analysis explanation. Initially, introduced the China denounced rail system to establish background and judicial according to the analysis of the China denounced rail of the existing achievement, contains no independent report an accepting institution, the lack of standards denounced French, there is no perfect report system, report operation transparency low, the lack of useful monitoring and so on. At the same time, the advantages and the lack of the Korean public interest in the protection of the law to perfect our country's information system put forward their own views. First, our country should establish a special "cover law", to further promote the information system of the legal system, standardization, systematization. Second, the establishment of the competent authorities, and to ensure that they have access to independent inquiry and the right to monitor the. Third, establish a perfect collection of information system. Fourth, to fulfill the real name of the report, to establish a strict system of confidentiality. Fifth, sound information to encourage and ensure the system. Today, our country has not yet formulated special report cover law enforcement, and the United States, Britain, South Korea, Japan and other countries have already introduced relevant laws, China denounced rail of the lack of restricting report task profound expansion, denounced the delineations are not the only scattered in the laws, regulations and standard documents, formulate special report law enforcement persons mask, standard report rescue, guarantee, control mechanism, guarantee the fulfillment of the national report of power on, enhance the law-abiding discipline back illegal action monitoring, coordination of social stability and national settle down have focused on the eve of the meaning. And South Korea, "the public prosecutor's cover law" developed an absolutely perfect system of information on the system, to stop the study of China's report on the perfect system has a certain significance. 目录: |
