基于双层博弈“获胜集合”的概念[韩语论文]

资料分类免费韩语论文 责任编辑:金一助教更新时间:2017-05-05
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
暗斗后,韩语论文题目,韩国的政党政治进入绝对有序成长的阶段,政党在国度政治中施展的感化也愈来愈显著。在暗斗后韩国政党的成长过程中,右翼政党和左翼政党的分野愈来愈显著,而对朝政策则是其不合的核心之一。韩国的选举机制使得政党经由过程作用年夜选进而作用全部对朝政策的走势,可以说政党在对朝政策的制订和实施上具有决议性感化。以平易近主党为首的右翼保持对朝紧张,构成了有名的“阳光政策”和“战争繁华政策”,而以年夜国度党为首的左翼则保持对朝强硬,适用主义政策是其典范的代表。美国粹者罗伯特·帕特南提出了有名的双层博弈实际,该实际提醒了国际政治和国际政治的亲密关系,特殊是国际政治在国际来往的主要感化。其焦点概念是“获胜聚集”,即赞同一项对外政策的国际政治力气的支撑。作用“获胜聚集”的诸方面身分中,政党身分处于极端主要的位置,政党经由过程作用选平易近的政治偏向和当局的构成作用到全部“获胜聚集”的构成和年夜小。而“获胜聚集”的年夜小也直接作用到该项对外政策能否可以或许顺遂的实行。本文以帕特南双层博弈实际为根本思惟,自创了海伦·米尔纳、兰蒂斯等学者的思惟,从政党身分对“获胜聚集”的作用动手,论证韩国政党在对朝政策中的感化。在实证剖析中,本文经由过程金年夜中“阳光政策”和李明博适用主义政策的比较,对阁下两翼政党在对朝政策“获胜聚集”中的作用力和作用门路停止了剖析,韩语论文题目,并得出了两派政党在对朝政策上逐步趋同的结论。同时,本文还对以后朴槿惠当局的对朝“信赖过程”政策中的政党身分停止了略论,并提出往后朴槿惠处置对朝关系中坚持“获胜聚集”最年夜化的几点建议。

Abstract:

After the cold war, the absolute orderly growth stage of Party Politics in South Korea, in the national political party in his role is more and more obvious. In the growth process of South Korea after the cold war party, right-wing and left-wing parties, more and more significant, and the policy towards the north is one of the sub core. South Korea's electoral system, which makes the party through the process of the impact of the election and then affect all of the trend toward the policy, it can be said that the political parties in the formulation and implementation of the policy toward the decision to be sexy. The right-wing party, led by the Democratic Party, led by the right wing to maintain the tension, constitute a famous "sunshine policy" and "war downtown policy", and the National Party, led by the left wing is kept on the tough, the application of the policy is a model of the representative. American scholar Robert Putnam presents a double game actual famous, the actual reminder of the intimate relationship of international politics and international politics, international politics is the main role in the special international dealings. The focus concept is "victory", which is the support of the international political power of foreign policy. In the various aspects of the "victory", the political parties in the party are in an extremely important position, and the political bias and the composition of the government affect the composition and the size of the whole "winning and gathering". "Winning together" of the eve of the small but also directly affect the foreign policy can be smoothly implemented perhaps. In this paper, Putnam two-level game practice as the fundamental thought, from Helen Milner, Landis and other scholars thought, from the political identity of "win together" hands-on demonstration, policy toward the Korean political parties in action. In the empirical analysis, this paper through the process of Kim Dae "sunshine policy" and Lee Myung-bak 's policy, on your wings on the influence and impact of party policy toward "win together" in the way of the analysis, and that both parties in the policy toward the gradual convergence of the conclusion. At the same time, this article also on the future of the Pu Jinhui administration to the "trust process" policy in the political party identity analysis, and put forward to the future of Pu Jinhui disposal of the relationship in the "win" the most of the eve of the proposal.

目录:

摘要   4-5   ABSTRACT   5   目录   6-8   图表目录   8-9   绪论   9-15       0.1 选题的目的   9       0.2 选题的意义   9-10       0.3 国内外探讨近况   10-13           0.3.1 双层博弈理论的探讨   10-12           0.3.2 韩国政党及政党对朝政策探讨   12-13       0.4 探讨措施   13       0.5 创新点及不足   13-15           0.5.1 创新   13-14           0.5.2 不足之处   14-15   1 双层博弈理论范式及“获胜集合”的细化   15-21       1.1 双层博弈理论理论范式   15-18           1.1.1 双层博弈理论的内涵   15-17           1.1.2 双层博弈的发展   17-18       1.2 “获胜集合”的细化   18-21           1.2.1 “获胜集合”的组成部分   19-20           1.2.2 “获胜集合”各部分之间的关系   20-21   2 对朝政策“获胜集合”中的韩国政党因素   21-35       2.1 民主化之后韩国政党的对朝政策概述   21-24           2.1.1 左翼政党的对朝政策   21-22           2.1.2 右翼政党的对朝政策   22-24       2.2 韩国政党在“获胜集合”中的影响   24-29           2.2.1 韩国政党作用“获胜集合”的效能略论   24-26           2.2.2 韩国政党作用“获胜集合”的途径略论   26-29       2.3 韩国政党视角下对朝政策双层博弈范式   29-35           2.3.1 不变的静态模式   29-30           2.3.2 变化的动态模式   30-35   3 阳光政策和实用主义政策中的政党因素   35-44       3.1 左翼氛围下的阳光政策   35-39           3.1.1 “阳光政策”出台的背景   35-37           3.1.2 左翼政党作用下的对朝政策“获胜集合”   37-39       3.2 右翼支持下的实用主义政策   39-44           3.2.1 实用主义政策出台的背景   39-40           3.2.2 右翼政党作用下的对朝政策“获胜集合”   40-44   4 信任进程政策中的政党因素解析   44-53       4.1 信任进程政策的出台   44-48           4.1.1 信任进程政策的定位   44-45           4.1.2 信任进程对朝政策的国内因素略论   45-47           4.1.3 缓慢形成的对朝政策“获胜集合”   47-48       4.2 政党因素作用下的朴槿惠对朝政策展望   48-53           4.2.1 朴槿惠对朝政策中的政党因素   49-51           4.2.2 政党视角下保持“获胜集合”最大化   51-53   结束语   53-54   参考文献   54-59   致谢   59-61  

免费论文题目: