| 在现今经济区域化、一体化、全球化的配景下，单个经济体与全球经济接洽日趋慎密，互相依存度逐步增长。最近几年来跟着跨国公司的敏捷成长，特别是年夜型金融机构和金融衍生品的赓续涌现，更是加快了全球经济一体化的过程。商品、本钱、办事的活动加倍敏捷，在全球规模内构成了宏大复杂的收集机构。虚拟经济的迅猛成长为实体经济带来高质量的办事的同时，也存在着潜伏的风险。2007年以来迸发的美国次贷危机所发生的全球金融海啸正揭穿出金融体系的软弱性，并敏捷舒展至全球的各个重要经济体，韩语论文题目，对实体经济形成伟大冲击。时至昔日，北美、欧盟等世界重要经济体仍然在处在从本次危机中迟缓的恢复阶段。为了应对此次危机，列国纷纭采用办法来应对危机形成的冲击，安慰经济苏醒。本文的研究将核心放在韩国与台湾，韩国与台湾在经济成长水平的接近性，在研究中常被拿来比拟。经由过程对韩国和台湾阅历的亚洲金融危机和美国次贷危机停止比拟剖析，对两次金融危机迸发的缘由，传导机制停止回想、比拟与深入反思，并基于向量自回归（VAR）模子对美国次贷危机对台湾与韩国实体经济的冲击停止实证磨练，终究要提醒韩国和台湾经济在阅历金融危机时遭到的作用，当局推出的微观经济政策，和以后的经济成长途径有何分歧。进而推行到一些新兴市场经济体，提出往后应对金融危机无益的自创。若何预防金融危机，和在迸发金融危机后采用有用的办法来防止对实体经济形成严重的作用。同时明白在分歧成长阶段若何依据国际外的现实情况选择合适本身的经济成长计谋，包含家当政策等。本文经由过程体系的研究韩国与台湾所阅历的两次金融危机，得出了以下结论。第一，两次金融危机的迸发缘由包含资产泡沫化，经济增加形式的内涵缺点，微观经济政策的掉误，对金融本钱的监管不敷完美等。第二，亚洲金融危机时代，韩语论文题目，韩国经济遭遇重创。在IMF的监视指点下停止深刻的金融体系体例改造，从此经济再度突起。台湾受冲击较小，但未能处理金融体系存在的成绩，也为往后次贷危机遭遇袭击埋下了祸殃。第三，在美国次贷危机时代，韩国经济遭到的作用要小于台湾，在应对政策上，台湾方面在财务政策上更加详细，采用的办法也更多，后果也加倍显著。 Abstract: Under the background of nowadays regional economy, integration, globalization, individual economies and the global economy approached the increasingly rigorous and mutual dependence is increasing gradually. In recent years along with the rapid development of multinational companies, especially large financial institutions and financial derivatives of ceaseless emerge in large numbers, it is to accelerate the process of global economic integration. Goods, capital, the activities of the business more agile, in the global scale constitutes a huge complex collection agencies. The rapid growth of the virtual economy to the real economy to bring high quality work, but also there is a latent risk. Since 2007, the outbreak of the American loan crisis of the global financial tsunami is revealing the piercing of the financial system weakness, and quickly spread to the world of all major economies, on the real economy formed a great impact. To the past, North America, the European Union and other major economies in the world is still in the recovery phase of the slow recovery from the crisis. In response to the crisis, all the way to deal with the crisis and the formation of the impact of economic recovery, comfort. In this paper, the core of the study in South Korea and Taiwan, South Korea and Taiwan in the economic growth level of proximity, in the study is often used to compare. Through the Asian financial crisis and Taiwan experience of the Asian financial crisis and the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis analysis, the two financial crisis, conduction mechanism to stop thinking, compare and in-depth reflection, and based on the vector autoregressive (VAR) model of the U.S. sub loan crisis on the impact of Taiwan and South Korea real economy to stop empirical training, to remind the economy in Taiwan, the impact of the financial crisis, the government introduced the micro economic policy, and after the economic growth path. And then the implementation of some emerging market economies, the future to deal with the financial crisis is not useful. How to prevent the financial crisis, and the financial crisis after the outbreak of the use of useful measures to prevent the formation of a serious impact on the real economy. Also understand in different growth stage how to according to the reality of select suitable for their economic development strategy, contains the belongings policy. In this paper, the following conclusions are drawn from the study of the two financial crisis in South Korea and Taiwan. First, the two financial crisis, the reason includes the burst of asset bubbles, economic growth in the form of the connotation of the shortcomings of the micro economic policy, the financial cost of supervision is not perfect, etc.. Second, the Asian financial crisis era, the South Korean economy suffered heavy losses. In the IMF under the supervision of the deep end of the reform of the financial system, from the economic once again raised. Taiwan by the impact of smaller, but failed to deal with financial system existing achievements, also for the subsequent subprime mortgage crisis hit buried the curse. Third, in the United States sub loan crisis era, the impact of the South Korean economy is less than Taiwan, in response to the policy, Taiwan in more detail in terms of financial policy, the approach is also more, the consequences are more significant. 目录: |
