| 1、论文研究目标和意义世界经济向前成长，全球化已成为经济成长的潮水，由此也给司法的成长带来了辽阔远景，休息法研究也是以而加倍繁华。在开放的社会和世界性的经济情况下，商量休息司法成绩显得尤其主要。中韩两国的休息法的成长和研究都面对着新的机会和挑衅时代。从中华国民共和国休息法及年夜韩平易近国休息法的比拟来熟悉一下两国的休息司法和向后两国休息司法的世界化成长措施。2、根本内容休息法是中公法学系统中一个主要而且自力的司法部分，韩语论文题目，在标准休息关系、构建协调社会中具有无足轻重的感化。中国为了标准用人单元与休息者订立和实行休息合同的行动，掩护休息者的正当权益，增进休息关系协调稳固，依据1994年中华国民共和国休息法综合性司法的基本上，2008年制订、颁布了中华国民共和国休息合同法特殊法。中华国民共和国休息合同法出台之前的中华国民共和国休息法，立法核心重要重视于公司的运营效力。不外新中华国民共和国休息合同法把休息者划分为“社会的弱者”并且新法的立法核心重要是掩护“社会的弱者”的权益和强调公司的社会义务，是以，中华国民共和国休息合同法的出台对中国休息关系的调剂具有深远作用。韩国不存在单一的休息法，很多法案中包括了有关休息关系根本成绩的划定，好比休息待遇、休息时光、辞退限制等最低休息前提的勤奋基准法；有关对休息者的伤害赔偿的家当灭害赔偿保险法；有关保证休息者的雇佣平安及掉业工资内容的招聘保险法；有关最低工资尺度内容的最低赁金法；和有关休息者工会性质的组织及休息争议内容的休息组正当和休息关系调剂法。韩国勤奋基准法出台之前韩国有关休息关系的法案数目曾经到达了32个，这些法案整体上组成了韩国“休息法"，不外在韩国普通把勤奋基准法视为国际上的休息法。因为中韩两国的根本政策、政治轨制和经济治理体系体例分歧，中韩两国有着分歧的司法基本，是以休息关系的司法系统也出现出显著的异同。所以本文侧重剖析比来比拟热点的中国现行休息法及休息合同法、比较中韩两国休息立法根本权力与休息司法、论述公司及休息者的作用，而且进一步剖析中韩两国的休息法的现况及差别点。3、本文的立异的地方本文的立异的地方在于对中华国民共和国休息合同法出台带来的变更内容和作用的解读，和对中韩现行休息司法的比拟，免费韩语论文，对两国之间的投资公司对两国休息司法的懂得有着积极感化。 Abstract: 1, the paper research goal and the significance of the world economy to grow, globalization has become the tide of economic growth, which also brought to the development of the justice of the broad vision, the rest of the law is to double the prosperity of the law. In the open society and the world economic situation, to discuss the rest of the judicial performance is particularly the main. China and South Korea's growth and Research on the rest of the law are facing new opportunities and challenges of the times. From the rest of the Republic of China and the eve of the rest of the Han Pingyi law of the rest of the analogy to familiar with the rest of the two countries and the rest of the judiciary and the rest of the world in the way of the development of the judiciary. 2, the basic content of the rest is a common legal system in a major and independent judiciary, in the standard of rest, to build a harmonious society has a negligible effect. China for standard use unit and the rest conclusion and implementation of the labor contract, the action, a cover the legitimate rights and interests, promote the rest relationship harmonious and stable, according to 1994 in the people's Republic of China Labor Law "comprehensive judicial basically, set in 2008, promulgated the" the people's Republic of China rest special law of contract law. The rest law of the people's Republic of China was promulgated before the rest contract law of the Republic of China. The core of the legislation is to attach importance to the operational effectiveness of the enterprise. Nothing more than the rest of the people's Republic of China contract law the rest divided into "weak society" and new legislation, the core important is the cover of "weak society" rights and emphasis on corporate social responsibility, is to the introduction of "the law of the people's Republic of China Labor Contract Law", "to the Chinese rest relationship adjustment has a far-reaching influence. South Korea there is no single method of rest, many bills including the delimitation of the rest of the basic issues, like the rest of the treatment, rest time, dismissal restrictions such as minimum rest premise "industry standard law; about the damage to the rest compensation the belongings of aminocarb compensation insurance act"; employment related to ensure that the rest of the peace and off manufacturing wage content of the recruitment of insurance law; about the contents of the minimum wage scale the minimum lease gold "; and the rest nature of trade union organizations and labor dispute content the rest group legitimate" and "labor relations adjustment method." South Korea, "diligence Standards Law" before the introduction of a number of South Korean labor relations act has reached 32. These act on the whole formed South Korea "labor law ", not outside South Korea common to the diligence Standards Law "as the method of rest. Because China and South Korea's fundamental policies, political system and economic management system differences, China and South Korea has a different judicial basic, is to break the relationship between the judicial system is also a significant difference. So this paper focuses analysis recently hot compared to China's current labor law and labor contract law, comparison between China and ROK rest legislation power and rest of justice, enterprises are discussed and the rest who influence, and further analysis of China and South Korea's labor law the status and difference. 3, the innovation place of this paper innovation place lies in the introduction of interpretation has changed the content and effect of the people's Republic of China labor contract law, and South Korea on current rest judicial analogy of between the two countries of investment enterprise of the rest two judicial know has a positive role. 目录: |
