| 本文经由过程对缔约过掉义务轨制的成长的论述，对缔约过掉义务概念、要求权基本、补偿规模等停止研究，联合比拟缔约过掉义务和背约义务的分歧，而且经由过程比拟中、韩两国在平易近事立法上对缔约过掉的划定的分歧和缔约过掉发生的前提和缔约过掉存在的类型的分歧，韩语论文题目，指出中国和韩国两国在平易近事立法上的缺乏和自创意义。如今社会成长，生意业务的庞杂与单一，在中国诚信信誉轨制尚不健全的社会中，完美的司法规制在很年夜水平上作用着生意业务的停止，合同业为是生意业务最为广泛的一种内在表示情势，缔约进程中的各种成绩，对缔约过掉义务轨制提出了新的考验，本文旨在经由过程比拟中韩的立法与现状，韩语论文范文，可以或许是两国在立法上加倍趋于完美，更好的掩护合同当事人的正当权力。 Abstract: This paper through the contracting out compulsory rail growth discussed. The contracting after off duty concept, requirement of fundamental rights, compensation scale such as research, joint compared to parties out differences between the obligations and the duties of the covenant, and through the process of comparison between China and Korea in plain recent legislation of contracting over disagreements and contracting out to delineate the off premise and contracting off types exist differences. It is pointed out that China and South Korea in civilian legislation deficiency and significance. Now social development, the business complex and single, in social integrity of China credit system is not perfect, perfect the judicial regulation on the very big level affects business stop, contract as a business the most extensive internal representation of the situation, association about the process of the various grades, of contracting off duty rail system to put forward a new test, this paper aims to through compare legislation and the status quo of China and South Korea may be between the two countries in legislation on double tends to perfect, better cover the parties to a contract due to the power. 目录: 中文摘要 3-4 英文摘要 4 引言 6-7 第1章 缔约过失责任制度发展 7-12 1．1 缔约过失责任制度发展 7-11 1．2 韩中缔约过失责任法学规定 11-12 第2章 缔约过失责任的基础理论 12-24 2．1 缔约过失责任的基本概念 12-16 2．1．1 缔约过失责任的理论与意义 12-14 2．1．2 韩国的缔约过失责任理论 14-16 2．2 缔约过失责任上过失责任的法理 16-24 2．2．1 中国理论 16-21 2．2．2 韩国理论 21-24 第3章 缔约过失责任略论 24-42 3．1 缔约上过失的类型 24-40 3．1．1 中国缔约上过失类型 24-29 3．1．2 缔约上过失之赔偿责任的事由 29-31 3．1．3 韩国缔约过失责任的类型 31-40 3．2 缔约过失责任的救济 40-42 3．2．1 赔偿范围 40-41 3．2．2 缔约上过失救济 41 3．2．3 时效的消灭 41-42 第4章 结论 42-45 |
