| 本文是一篇中韩两国引渡法和分离缔结的引渡合同比拟剖析的硕士论文,其重要研究对象为1990年结合国引渡示范合同、中韩两国的引渡法和中国缔结的30项引渡合同和韩国缔结的29项引渡合同,其研究重要内容为可引渡犯法、谢绝引渡的来由和“或许引渡,或许告状”和引渡要求的竞合可引渡犯法包含两重犯法准绳、财税犯法和可引渡犯法递进的前提;谢绝引渡的来由和“或许引渡,或许告状”包含政治犯法、不合法的追诉目标、军事犯法、一事不再理、时效、赦宥、告知才处置的犯法、严刑、合法法式和特殊法庭、出席判决、本国公民、逝世刑和人性主义斟酌;引渡要求的竞合包含引渡要求竞合的情形和引渡要求竞应时斟酌身分。本文阐述傍边,起首,笔者比拟剖析了中国和韩国的引渡合同理论,成果显示中韩两国对引渡合同的立场在国际引渡合同的理论很积极的感化。其次,每一个章节都提出了一个研究的重要内容,其内容在引渡示范合同、中韩分离缔结的双边引渡合同和国际引渡法上若何划定、若何实行等梳理和比拟,商量若何更好地实行这些合同和完美国际法。最初,本文总结每一个章节的研究结果,为中国和韩国将来将缔结或参加引渡合同和国际立法供给参考看法,为引渡合同范畴将来的现实操作有很年夜的进献。个中,笔者以为在财税犯法、一事不再里和“或许引渡,或许告状”范畴有奇特的研究结果财税犯法应当划定在“两重犯法准绳”条目里;谢绝引渡情况将划定在“可以”谢绝引渡的来由条目里;每一个谢绝引渡的来由应当和“或许引渡,或许告状”准绳挂钩起来处置其实用。 Abstract: This is a Sino Korean extradition and separation and extradition contract concluded a comparative analysis of the master's thesis, the important research object for the 1990 United Nations model contract "," Extradition between China and South Korea's "Extradition Law" and Chinese concluded 30 extradition contract and South Korea concluded 29 extradition contract, an important part of the research extraditable offence, extradition and reason "may refuse extradition, may complain and the request for extradition extraditable crime crime concurrence include double taxation principle, premise crime and extraditable crime by reason and refused extradition; perhaps extradition may complain of illegal crime, including the political and military criminal prosecution goal idem, aging, pardon, inform to disposal of illegal, torture, and special court, attended the French legal judgment, their citizens, the death penalty and humanitarian charge The concurrence of discretion; the extradition request contains the extradition request competing situation and should consider when competing extradition request identity. In this paper, Bangbian, first and foremost, the author compared and analyzed the China and South Korea's extradition contract theory results, it showed that the ROK for extradition contract position in the extradition of contract theory is a positive role. Secondly, each chapter put forward a research important content, the content in the extradition contract model ", and conclude the separation between China and South Korea bilateral extradition contracts and international the Extradition Law how to delimit, how to implement a combing and comparison, to discuss how to better implement the same and perfect international law. At first, this paper summarizes the research results of each chapter, as China and South Korea in the future will be concluded or participated in the extradition of contracts and international legislation to provide reference views, for extradition of contract in the future practical operation has very big contribution. Medium, I think in taxation crime, a matter no longer in and "perhaps extradition, perhaps complain" category has the peculiar research results of tax crime shall be designated in the "double criminality principle" entry in; declined the extradition case will be delineated in may refuse extradition reason entries; each a refused to extradite the reason should be and "perhaps extradition, perhaps complain" principle linked to dispose of them the practical. 目录: 摘要 3-4 Abstract 4-5 第一章 绪论 8-14 一、问题的提出 8-11 二、中国和韩国的国际刑事司法合作概况 11-13 (一) 中国的国际刑事司法合作概况 11-12 (二) 韩国的国际刑事司法合作概况 12-13 三、本文探讨范围 13-14 第二章 中国和韩国的引渡条约概况 14-23 一、中国缔结的引渡条约 14-18 (一) 中国缔结的引渡条约概况 14-16 (二) 中国在不同年度与各国缔结的引渡条约 16-18 二、韩国缔结的引渡条约 18-23 (一) 韩国缔结的引渡条约概况 19-21 (二) 韩国在不同年度与各国缔结的引渡条约 21-23 第三章 中国和韩国的引渡法学中关键内容的比较略论 23-59 一、可引渡犯罪 23-29 (一) 双重犯罪准则 23-25 (二) 双重犯罪准则的举例：财税犯罪 25-27 (三) 可引渡犯罪：递进的条件 27-29 二、拒绝引渡的理由 29-52 (一) 政治犯罪 29-32 (二) 不正当的追诉目的 32-35 (三) 军事犯罪 35-36 (四) 一事不再理：已判案 36-38 (五) 一事不再理：刑事管辖竞合(未判案) 38-41 (六) 时效、赦免及告诉才处理的犯罪 41-42 (七) 酷刑 42-43 (八) 正当程序和特别法庭 43-45 (九) 缺席判决 45-46 (十) 本国国民 46-48 (十一) 死刑 48-49 (十二) 人道主义考虑 49-50 (十三) 其他拒绝引渡的理由 50-52 三、或者引渡，韩语论文网站，或者起诉 52-55 (一) 不引渡就起诉 52-53 (二) 或者引渡，或者起诉 53-55 (三) 小结 55 四、引渡请求竞合 55-59 (一) 引渡请求竞合的规定 55-56 (二) 引渡请求竞合考虑因素的规定 56-57 (三) 小结 57-59 第四章 结论 59-61 参考文献 61-64 致谢 64-65 个人简历 65 |
