This study aims to show the ‘acquisition order’ and ‘acquisition pattern’ of Korean particle combination under different language exposure.
Three group of Chinese learners under different language exposure were enrolled in test which was ...
This study aims to show the ‘acquisition order’ and ‘acquisition pattern’ of Korean particle combination under different language exposure.
Three group of Chinese learners under different language exposure were enrolled in test which was designed to examine development of learner language in the acquisition of particle combination. (1)Instruction Only: Subjects came from a university in China. They are majoring in Korean, and their only exposure to and conversation with Korean speakers came through classroom and textbook instruction. (2)Naturalistic: Subjects are married female immigrants, and their exposure to and conversation with Korean speakers came from residence in the Korean-speaking community, and (3)Mixed (a combination of 1 and 2): Subjects in this group were attending an intensive Korean program at a university in Korea, and their exposure to and conversation with Korean speakers came from both classroom and textbook instruction and the wider community.
Effects of the three conditions of second language exposure were revealed in the acquisition order and acquisition pattern of particle combination. It was tested by analyzing using the implicational table for implicational scaling. The test results are following:
First, 「semantic case markers(의미격 조사)/particle(첨사)」, 「postposition(후치사)/particle(첨사)」 are most easily acquired, and lastly acquired are「combination with grammatical case markers(문법격 조사) ‘의’」, 「combination with ‘이/가’, ‘을/를’ which has ‘semantic functions’」 in all group. There is a difference with Naturalistic group between Instruction Only & Mixed group. The difference is that Naturalistic subjects easily acquired 「semantic combination between postposition and semantic case markers」than 「semantic case markers/postposition」.
Second, Combination with particle such as 「semantic case markers/particle」, 「postposition/particle」 shows the highest percentage of correct answers in Mixed group, and 「semantic combination between postposition and semantic case markers」shows the highest percentage of correct answers in Naturalistic group.
Third, In terms of proficiency, the levels of proficiency is related to acquisition of particle combination in Naturalistic group. In this study, cause the levels of proficiency in Naturalistic group was determined by period of residence in Korea. so this result means that acquiring particle combination is related to period of residence in Korea in Naturalistic group.
Through this study I tried to find the ‘acquisition order’ and ‘acquisition pattern’ of Korean particle combination under different language exposure.. This study implies the need for an organized teaching order and teaching methods of particle combination and will assist teachers to develop the effective teaching methods.
，韩语毕业论文，韩语论文范文 |
