| 法国事较早展开比拟法研究的东方国度之一。早在 18 世纪，法公法律家孟德斯鸠所著的论法的精力就是汗青上法律实际的一本佳构。到 19 世纪时，法国的比拟法研究更是位居世界前列。格特里奇乃至传播鼓吹，古代意义上的比拟司法研究开端于 1869 年在巴黎创建的“比拟立法律会”，而比拟法律则真正出生于由该协会在 1900年组织的首届国际比拟法年夜会。 从某种意义下去说，法国可称为古代比拟法的家乡。与法国比拟，法语论文范文，我国的比拟法研究今朝还处于初始阶段，而对前者的考核也会为我国比拟法研究供给优越的自创。从这一目标动身，本文从 19 世纪开端对法国比拟法的过程加以评述，法语论文范文，偏重点引见其在 20 世纪的成长与演化，前后时光跨度达两百年之久。 第一章从整体上引见了法国比拟法在 19 世纪的成长概略。其内容表现在三个方面19 世纪上半叶法国比拟法的初步成长；1869 年法国比拟立法律会的树立与比拟立法研究的展开与作用；和 19 世纪末法国比拟法的新变更，偏重点对其时的有名比拟法律家萨莱伊加以扼要的引见和评价。 第二章侧重引见 1900 年在巴黎召开的首届国际比拟法年夜会的盛况。此次年夜会的召展开示了 19 世纪比拟法研究的结果，也为 20 世纪世界列国比拟法之成长奠基了WP=4坚实的基本。本章顺次引见了此次年夜会的目标、法式；朗贝尔与萨莱伊对于“配合法”的主要申报；和年夜会上所提出的司法多元、司法移植与司法同一的不雅点。第三章论述了从 1900 年至 1935 年法国比拟法成长之第二阶段的状态。因为相干实际扶植的蓬勃展开，该阶段被人们称为法国比拟法的“黄金时代”。而在两次世界年夜战时代，比拟法律家们对“世界法”的探访同样成为该时代比拟法的一年夜特点。但跟着二战的周全打响，法国比拟法也随之堕入低谷。作为萨莱伊的交班人，朗贝尔为该时代法国比拟法研究做出了伟大进献。本章也对朗贝尔及其著作停止了较为周全的解释。第四章重要从以下三个方面描写了二战后法国比拟法的中兴二战后至 20 世纪60 年月末法国比拟法的成长概略；对该时代法国有名比拟法律家勒内？ 达维德之比拟法思惟的评介；和对同时代其他几位优良的法国比拟法律家及其著作加以扼要引见。第五章就 20 世纪末法国比拟法所存在的成绩停止初步的略论，是全文的实际论述部门。这重要表现在以下几个方面比拟法的办法论；比拟法与本国法研究；比拟法与司法说话；实证主义与同一主义；对“同一欧洲法”的质疑；比拟法的跨学科研究；和比拟法的批评感化等等。在文章的结语部门，作者还试着对法国比拟法在两百年成长过程中所构成的特色加以归纳综合。 Abstract: France is one of the first countries to start a comparative study of the eastern countries. Early in the 18th century, public law jurists Montesquieu's "method of energy" is in the history of the legal actual a. By nineteenth Century, the French analogy method is among the world's top. Gutteridge and propaganda, ancient significance compare justice began to study in 1869 in Paris to create "analogy legislation to, and compare law is actually born by the association in 1900, the organization of the first international comparison method can. In some sense, France can be called the hometown of the ancient analogy method. Compared with France, China's comparative law research is still in the initial stage, and the assessment of the former will also provide excellent reference for our country's comparative law. Starting from this goal, this article from the beginning of nineteenth Century, the French analogy to the process of the process to be reviewed, partial emphasis on its growth and evolution in twentieth Century, and after the time span of two hundred years. In the first chapter on France in the nineteenth Century general growth comparison method. The content in three aspects: the 19th century French analogy method of preliminary growth; analogy law society for France in 1869 was established and compared with the expansion and the influence of the legislative research; and at the end of the 19th century French analogy method of new change, partial focus on the famous match SA ley jurists to be a brief introduction and evaluation. The second chapter focuses on 1900 in Paris held the first international conference grand analogy. The called discovery of the 19th century compared to the results of the research, also for the 20th century world nations compared growth laid a solid the WP=4. This chapter successively introduced the goal, French; Lambert and SA ley on "with the law" to the primary reporting; and will put forward the Judicial Yuan, judicial transplantation and judicial with an indecent point. The third chapter discusses the status of the second stage of growth from 1900 to 1935. Because of the vigorous development of the actual construction, the stage is known as the golden age of the French analogy". And in the two world wars era, compare the jurists of "world" visit also become the era of the analogy method one big characteristics. But followed World War II comprehensive start, the French analogy law also subsequently falling into the trough. As Saray's successor, Lambert made a great contribution to the era of French analogy research. This chapter also gives a more comprehensive explanation of Lambert and his works. Chapter four important from the following three aspects described the analogy method, grow roughly for France in the late in France after the Second World War analogy ZTE after World War II to the 20th century, 60 years; to the age of France's famous match jurist Rene? Davide compared fath except review; and at the same time other several excellent French match jurists and their works to be briefly introduce. The fifth chapter is the analysis of the results of the French Comparative Law in the end of twentieth Century, which is the actual discussion section of the full text. The important performance in the following aspects compared approach theory; comparative law and the national law research; comparative law and justice to speak; positivism and the same doctrine; questioning of a "European identity"; analogy method of interdisciplinary research; and compared criticism effect and so on. In the concluding part of the article, the author also tries to sum up the characteristics of the French analogy method in the course of two hundred years of growth. 目录: |
