| 笛卡尔一方面强调思惟主体的纯真性，也就是无广延、非时光的特点，法语论文题目，使之可以离开身材而零丁存在；另外一方面，在阐述身材之实存和感到功效时，又对身材的认知功效有所认可。梅洛一庞蒂的我思阐释不只否定了纯真思想主体的永久性，将我思从新提醒为一个时空中的事宜，还由此勾画出一个更加贴切的主体抽象。 马里翁以为，先验主体同时面对着自我决裂和自我关闭两个困难决裂是由于他既要充任基本，又要充任准绳；自我关闭是由于作为先验准绳，它就弗成以作为经历之我而出现给其他自我，这就形成主体的唯我论危机。为懂得决这两个困难，马里翁对笛卡尔的寻思集作了全新的解读，以为笛卡尔真正偏好的不是有名的ego cogito，ergo sum，而是第二寻思中的ego sum，ego existo。后一个ego之实存在第二寻思中是由一个匿名、不肯定的他者来付与的，由于它是在与后者的对话中取得了本身的存在。马里翁由此以为，ego具有一种原初的他性。 纯洁感性批评的“先验理性论”给出了一个对于景象的产生论的界说，个中相干的认知功效也具有必定的主动特点。然则景象并未是以得以自立浮现，而是在先验组成论的剖析中慢慢损失其自动性，成为被组成的熟悉对象。经典景象学家胡塞尔和海德格尔都触及到景象本己的既予性，法语论文题目，然则也异样前后错掉了本身的发明。梅洛一庞蒂将景象置于我（moi）一别人一事物的互动构造中，景象开端解脱纯真认知对象的位置。列维纳斯在一种主体与他者的伦理学关系中议论景象，现实上商量了主体本身景象化的能够。马里翁经由过程第三复原恢复了景象的既予性，也为一种新型的主体抽象的涌现摊平了途径。 Abstract: Descartes emphasized thinking subject of pure sex, is without extension, the characteristics of time, can leave the body and Lingding exist; on the other hand, in this figure and feel the effect and the cognitive function of the body has been approved. Melo, a pang of my thinking is not only to explain the innocence of the main idea of the permanent, I think from a new reminder for a matter of time and space, but also to draw a more appropriate subject abstract. Marion thought, the transcendental subject also face a self break and self closed two difficult break because he not only acted as basic, but also acted as the criterion; self off is due to the a priori principle, Eph into as the experience I appear to other self, which form the main body of solipsism crisis. To understand these two difficulties, Marion to Descartes' "thinking" has made the new interpretation, that Descartes real preference is not famous ego cogito, ergo sum, but the second thinking ego sum ego existo. After a ego existence of second guessing is entrusted by a anonymous, not sure of the other, because it is itself being made with the dialogue. Marion therefore thought that ego had an original. The pure perceptual criticism "of" transcendental reason theory gives a on the scene on the definition, medium coherent cognitive functions also has certain active characteristics. What, then the picture is not to be able to emerge, but in the analysis of the theory of a priori slowly lost its automatic nature, become familiar with the object. Husserl and Heidegger are both classical scene experts to touch the scene has been given to the nature, but also different from the wrong before and after the invention. Melo, a pang of the scene in my (MOI) one of the other people in the construction of a thing, the scene began to release the pure cognitive object location. Levinas in an ethical relationship between the subject and the other to talk about the scene, the reality of the subject itself to discuss the scene of the. Marion, through the process of third restoration to restore the vision of the nature, but also for a new type of the emergence of the emergence of the emergence of a new type of. 目录: 封面 1-2 |
