| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文以汗青唯心主义和辩证唯心主义作为指点思惟，联合本学科的特色，经由过程运用汗青学、平易近族学、宗教授教养、政治社会学等相干实际和道理，采取学科穿插的办法，借助现有的有关中、英、俄等史籍材料和翻译整顿的藏文材料，普遍汲取和参考国际外相干的研究结果，经由过程对19世纪末20世纪初，英、俄两国在亚洲地域，特殊是在西藏的争取情势和俄国侵藏进程中，在分歧阶段采用的分歧战略及表示措施的略论与研究，旨在对俄国侵犯西藏战略及表示措施的有关成绩做出绝对公道的解读。本研究重要分为三个部门第一部门，以“英俄在亚洲的争取与沙俄晚期对西藏的觊觎与侵犯”为题，经由过程对第一次工业反动以后，亚洲沦为众列强，特别是英、俄这两个帝国主义国度猖狂争取的重要对象的阐述，俄语论文网站，侧重摸索中国西藏之所以可以或许惹起英、俄兴致的缘由，并联合两国在针对亚洲及西藏地域侵犯成绩上所制订的一系列筹划与战略的比较剖析，初步得出绝关于英国的武装侵犯，俄国所采用的战略和手腕更具有隐藏性和风险性这一特色。同时经由过程沙俄在19世纪70年月之前，对西藏停止的各类侵犯运动的剖析阐述，提醒出沙俄当局对西藏的野心由来已久。第二部门，以“19世纪末20世纪初俄国对西藏的侵犯”为题，重要剖析研究俄国在侵犯西藏的这一成绩上采用的各类战略及其响应的表示措施，进而得出俄国对我国西藏的侵犯，是一个历久的进程，它在分歧的情势下，采用了分歧的政策和分歧的侵犯措施这个结论，并指出俄国妄图并吞西藏的野心倒是一向都在，而且是愈来愈年夜，一向到1917年，俄国十月反动迸发，沙俄政权被颠覆，新的苏维埃政权出生并拟定了新的社会主义交际政策，俄国对我国西藏的侵犯才终究停止。第三部门，结语。在该部门中，经由过程对后面两个部门内容的归结总结，进一步强调俄国为了完成本身独霸亚洲甚至世界的野心，可谓竭尽所能，无其不消，同心专心想把西藏从中国决裂出去，然则客不雅现实是西藏古往今来都是中国国土的一部门，俄语论文网站，是弗成朋分的，历代中心当局都在西藏处所下行使着主权，一切侵犯运动和决裂行动都将遭到中心当局和西藏国民的果断抵抗，所以，俄国对西藏的侵犯也势必走向掉败。 Abstract: In this paper, the history of idealism and dialectical materialism as the guiding ideology, combined with the subject characteristics, through the application of history, nationality, religion, political science professor education sociology and the actual coherent truth, take the subjects through way, based in Britain, Russia and other historical materials and rectify the existing materials of Tibetan translation generally, absorbing and referencing the research results of relevant international, through the end of nineteenth Century and early twentieth Century, Britain and Russia in the Asian region, especially in Tibet and the Russian invasion of Tibet for the situation in the process of strategic differences and said the analysis and discussion of the methods used in different stages, and the results of interpretation is to Tibet strategy invasion of Russia and said the way to make the absolute justice. Infringement rampant coveted late for this study is divided into three sections. The first section, "Britain and Russia in Asia and Russia in Tibet and the invasion" as the theme, through the process of the first industrial revolution, Asia has fallen for the public powers, especially Britain, Russia and the two imperialist countries strive for an important object of description, focusing on exploring China Tibet may be the reason why maybe cause English and Russian interest in reason, and combined with the two countries in Asia and the Tibet region scores on the formulation of a series of planning and strategy of comparative analysis, the preliminary conclusion that the absolute in the British military aggression, Russia, the strategy and the wrist is more hidden and risk of this feature. And through the process of Russia in the 19th century, 70 years before, on Tibet to stop all kinds of violation of motion analysis on, to remind the ambitions of Tibet tsarist authorities has a long history. The second sector, with the title "at the end of nineteenth Century early twentieth Century Russia to Tibet, by the analysis of important violations" Russia in violation of Tibet's performance on the various types of strategy and response representation method, and then come to Russia invasion of Tibet in China, is a long process, it is in a different situation. The violation of the policy differences between the different methods and the conclusions, and pointed out that the Russian attempt to annex Tibet ambition is always in, and it is more and more big, until 1917, the Russian October revolution broke out, the Tsarist regime was overturned, the new Soviet regime was born and developed a new socialist foreign policy, the Russian invasion of China's Tibet will eventually stop. The third sector, the conclusion. In the Department, through the process on the back of two parts attributed to summarize further emphasizes Russia to complete itself to dominate Asia and even the world's ambition, can be described as the best, no its not, concentric concentrate to to Tibet from China to break out, however the objective reality is through the ages of Tibet is part of China's territory, Eph into friends, ancient central authorities are in Tibet place down the sovereignty, all violations of motor and break action will be met with the decisive resistance from the central government and the Tibetan people, so Russia's invasion of Tibet is bound to fail. 目录: |
