| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，俄语论文范文，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 作为国度权利更替的平易近主情势，总统选举在俄罗斯平易近主政治生涯中占领主要地位。因为总统在俄罗斯三权分立权利系统中的主要感化，所以俄罗斯总统选举就成为平易近众、政党和各类社会政治组织最为存眷的社会政治运动之一。对三届总统选举的比拟剖析可以从一个正面懂得转型时代俄罗斯平易近主政治成长的轨迹。全文除导言外共分为四部门。第一章“俄罗斯三届总统选举概述”。在这章中概述性地引见了俄罗斯三届总统选举的根本进程及其选举成果。因为总统在俄罗斯权利体系体例中的焦点位置，历届总统选举成为转型时代俄罗斯社会分歧成长阶段权利奋斗和抵触抵触的核心。在1991年的首届总统选举中，作为俄联邦最高苏维埃主席的叶利钦被选为全平易近总统，从而为他在与戈尔巴乔夫的同盟中心对抗中增长了筹马。1996年的总统选举是以叶利钦为首的平易近主派与久加诺夫为代表的右翼否决派环绕国度将来成长途径成绩睁开的一次政治比武，叶利钦的终究成功注解俄罗斯社会的平易近主改造途径弗成逆转。2000年的俄联邦第三届总统选举具有里程碑性质，它完成了俄罗斯汗青上政权的初次战争交代，注解俄罗斯社会曾经停止有关成长途径的权利争取，并开端向着有序的偏向成长。第二章“历届总统选举中当权候选人获胜的缘由”。在这一章中，我们重点对三届总统选举中当权候选人获胜的缘由停止了深刻地剖析。在剖析的基本上，我们以为，虽然三届总统选举中当权候选人获胜的前提和所具有的政治资本各不雷同，但可以发明：第一，不管是1991年和1996年的叶利钦，照样2000年的普京，他们都具有显著的政权优势。这类政治优势为他们在竞选时代调剂政策，收买选平易近发明了前提。第二，他们都具有转型时代俄罗斯社会成长所必需的小我政治魅力，和对社会政治资本的运用才能和对社会成长趋向与平易近众心思的掌握才能。是以，这类获胜的缘由不是有时的，它透视涌现阶段俄罗斯总统选举的一种竞选形式，即小我身分与政权资本相联合而施展感化的形式，这类形式包管了当权候选人的终究获胜。但在2000年的选举中这类形式也涌现了纤细的变更，俄语论文题目，即政党愈来愈多地介入到总统竞选中来，并开端施展感化。第三章“作用总统选举的身分”。在前两章的基本上，本章侧重对作用三届总统选举的诸身分（包含选举轨制、政权、政党和杜马选举）及其特色停止了归结和剖析，我们得出的结论是：俄罗斯选举轨制的特别性、政党政治的不成熟性和杜马在国度权利系统中的弱势位置都为在任总统候选人运用政权资本的感化供给了能够性。是以，现阶段俄罗斯总统选举的特色表示为：政权的感化、当权候选人的超党派身份与他的小我魅力是决议选举成果的重要身分。在结论部门，我们归纳综合性地总结了俄罗斯总统选举这一平易近主政治行动的根本特点。从严厉意义下去说，2000年总统选举后，叶利钦与普京之间完成的政权移交只是政权阶级外部的权利传承，其实不是真正意义上的政权更迭。同时，我们在剖析的基本上，提出了总统选举在现阶段俄罗斯政治成长中的实际感化，它包含：起首，总统选举作为平易近主政治的一部门，增进了俄罗斯社会的稳固。各类政治力气经由过程介入总统选举赓续地停止着分化组合， 那些极真个或保守的、与现政权相排挤的政治流派和政治主意逐步被摈弃，代之以分歧流派之间纲要上的趋同。经由过程总统选举，各类不安宁的杜会身分获得了化解，社会到达了绝对的协调与稳固。其次，广泛、直接的总统选举成为疏浚平易近意的重要渠道。在各类抵触互相碰撞的俄罗斯转型时代，它起到了社会“减压器”的感化。平易近众及各社会政治组织经由过程选举运动表达意志、介入国度政治生涯，在社会经济和政治危机中发生的各类抵触和抵触也能够经由过程总统选举获得部门地释放。最初，我们以为，俄罗斯三届总统选举的特别性和它在俄罗斯政治生涯中的现实感化是俄罗斯转型时代社会成长的直接反应，有必定的汗青必定性。在今朝这类政治前提下，俄罗斯要树立一种真正有用而稳固的总统选举运转机制还有很长的路。 Abstract: As the country's replacement of the country's main situation, the presidential election in Russia's main political career occupied the main position. Russian presidential election is one of the most important social and political movements in the public, political parties and all kinds of social and political organizations because the president has a major role in the separation of the three rights system. Comparative analysis of the three presidential election can be seen from a positive understanding of the era of transformation of the Russian Democratic Political Growth trajectory. The full text is divided into four parts except the introduction. Chapter one "the summary of the three presidential election in russia". In this chapter, the basic process of the three presidential election and the results of the election are introduced in this chapter. Because of the position of the president in the Russian power system, the previous presidential election has become the core of the power struggle and conflict in the different stages of the transition period. In the first presidential election in 1991, as the Supreme Soviet President of the Russian Federation Yeltsin was elected president of the whole people, so as he grew up in the fight against the alliance with Gorbachev's horse. The 1996 presidential election is led by Yeltsin plain near the main school and Gennady Zyuganov as the representative of the right-wing veto sent around the country's future growth pathway results open a political contest, Yeltsin eventually successful annotation of Russian society plain near the main reforming ways of Eph into reverse. 2000 years of the Russian Federation third presidential elections has milestone nature, it completed the Russian history regime of the first war account, annotation of Russian society ever stop growth pathways involved right fight, and started towards the orderly biased growth. The second chapter: the reason for the victory of the candidate in the presidential election". In this chapter, we focus on the three presidential election victory in the election of the reasons for a profound analysis of the reasons. Based on the analysis, we think that although three presidential election to incumbent candidate wins the premise and has the political capital each are not identical, but can be found: first, whether it is in 1991 and 1996, Yeltsin, Putin still in 2000, they have a significant advantage of the regime. This kind of political advantage for them in the election era swap policy, buy the election of the people invented the premise. Second, they all have the personal political charm which is necessary for the social development of Russia in the period of transformation, and the application ability of the social political capital and the ability of the public to the social development trend and the public mind. Is the reason of this kind of winning not sometimes, it perspective emerged in the form of a stage in the Russian presidential election campaign, that the ego identity and political capital combination and play a role in the form of, this kind of form to ensure the establishment candidate ultimately win. But in the 2000 election, this kind of form also emerged slender change, that is, more and more political parties involved in the presidential election, and began to play a role. The third chapter "influences the identity of the presidential election". In, on the basis of the first two chapters, this chapter focuses on the influence of three presidential election various factors (including the electoral system, political power, political parties and elections for the Duma) and its characteristics summarized and analysis, we draw the conclusion: the Russian rail election system, and the party politics is not mature and the Duma in the state power system in a weak position for the action of incumbent president candidate application regime capital supply to. Is to, at this stage the characteristics of the Russian presidential election is as follows: the regime's influence, the power of the candidate's super party status and his personal charm is an important factor in the outcome of the election results. In the conclusion section, we summarize the basic features of the Russian presidential election of the democratic political action. From the strict sense, after the 2000 presidential election, Yeltsin and Putin completed the transfer of power is only the regime class external rights heritage, in fact, is not the regime change in the true sense. At the same time, we based on the analysis of the proposed presidential election at this stage in the growth of Russian political actual effect, it contains: first and foremost, the presidential election as part of democratic politics, enhance the stability of Russian society. All kinds of political strength through interventional ceaselessly in the presidential election to stop a differentiation and combination, those extreme or conservative, regime and phase of eduction political schools of thought and political idea gradually abandoned, with differences between genres compendium of convergence. Through the presidential election, all kinds of non peaceful society identity has been resolved, the community has reached the absolute coordination and stability. Secondly, extensive and direct presidential election has become an important channel for dredging. In all kinds of conflicts with each other in the era of transformation of the Russian transition, it played the role of social pressure. Plain public and the social political organization through the process of election campaign expression of will, involved in the country's political career, occurs in the social, economic and political crisis in all kinds of conflict and conflict can also obtain department through the presidential election to release. At first, we thought that the special nature of Russia's three presidential election and its practical influence in Russia's political career is a direct reaction to the social development of Russia in the era of transition, there is a certain 目录: |
