| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 近代构成的俄罗斯是多平易近族的同一国度，其在坚持文明向心力的同时，也对其境内的分歧平易近族管理方面留下了很多的经历与经验，个中异化政策的胜利与否关系到多平易近族国度的同一与稳固。在对乌克兰300多年的统治中，俄语毕业论文，俄罗斯一向在履行其异化政策。异化政策的实行具有多重的庞杂性，但它重要在造就认同感的基本下去停止。而认同感的树立也必需有响应的办法停止帮助，分歧阶段都具有分歧的特色。文章以详细的史实为根据和马克思汗青唯心主义与辩证唯心主义为指点，在力图普遍占领材料的基本上，侧重对异化政策的履行进程停止考核和作用后果停止剖析与评述。本文经由过程查寻年夜量的材料，细心研究思虑寻觅并处理的成绩重点是：俄罗斯对乌克兰异化特色剖析与异化要素的构成。乌克兰与俄罗斯平易近族之间的同质性与差别性对异化政策履行的作用。运用相干异化与文明圈实际对乌克兰器械部俄罗斯化进程停止剖析，调和同一多平易近族国度的全体性、处所认同的特别性之间、平易近族的成绩处置与社会联结的保护和国度稳固的关系。论文分三章睁开阐述，包含媒介和结语，开头部门是参考文献。主体部门分三章周全阐述了俄罗斯在乌克兰统治的树立与分歧时代异化政策的履行的特色，侧重从剖析俄罗斯化政策对乌克兰的作用和乌克兰外乡认同和分别主义之间的差别与接洽。第一章引见了乌克兰、俄罗斯平易近族的来源与俄罗斯在乌克兰统治的树立。第二章引见了俄罗斯在东部乌克兰哥萨克地域与西部乌克兰的统治与俄罗斯化政策的履行。第三章重点剖析俄罗斯化政策对乌克兰的作用与乌克兰外乡主义活动的鼓起。本文的重要不雅点是俄罗斯异化政策在赓续增强认同感的情形下在乌克兰履行获得胜利和其作用性也是伟大的。个中的一些掉误增进了乌克兰外乡文明的成长与外乡主义的发生，然则外乡主义与分别主义有着实质分歧和差别，不克不及把两者混为一谈。乌克兰外乡认识的构成重要是抵抗俄罗斯化履行进程中的负面作用与消极感化，其目标是追求文明的多样性与统一性的同一，在罗斯认同感的条件下追求乌克兰外乡文明与俄罗文雅化对等的位置，俄语论文题目，否决年夜俄罗斯主义。它同19世纪奥天时统治下的西乌克兰构成的平易近族分别主义是分歧的。乌克兰分别主义偏向不强的缘由反应出俄罗斯化在乌克兰胜利的水平。俄罗斯与乌克兰之间的相互作用培养了两者文明之间你中有我，我中有你密弗成分的关系。 Abstract: Times of Russia is a multi-ethnic country, the at the insistence of the centripetal force civilization. At the same time, the territory of different ethnic management left a lot of experience, medium alienation policy victory and not related to the multi-ethnic country and stable. In the 300 years of the rule of Ukraine, Russia has always been in the performance of its alienation policy. With the implementation of the policy of the complex multiple alienation, but it is important in creating a sense of identity on the basic stop. The identity must be set up to help stop the response, all have different characteristics in different stages. The historical detail based and idealism in the history of Marxism and dialectical idealism as a guide, tries to generally occupied materials, focusing on alienation policy fulfillment process assessment and consequences analysis and comment. The through the search process a large amount of materials, careful research consider looking for processing and results focus is: Russia to Ukraine alienation characteristic analysis and alienation of the elements. The influence of homogeneity and difference between Ukraine and Russia on the performance of the policy of alienation. Application of coherent alienation and civilization circle of Russia Ukraine equipment department process analysis, coordinate the relation between the same multi ethnic country of all, place identity, ethnic disposal issues and social connection protection and country strong. This paper is divided into three chapters to elaborate, including the media and the conclusion, the beginning of the Department is a reference. Main section of the divided into three chapters comprehensive on the Russian rule in Ukraine set up and different times alienation policy performance characteristics, focuses on the analysis of Russian policy of Ukraine and Ukrainian indigenous identity and respectively, the difference between Marxism and approached. The first chapter introduces the origin of Ukraine, the Russian nation and Russia in establishing Ukraine's rule. The second chapter introduces the Russia in the eastern Ukrainian Cossacks region and western Ukraine rule with Russia policy performance. The third chapter analyzes the influence of Russian policy on Ukraine and Ukraine have local activity. The indecent point is Russia alienation policy ceaselessly enhance a sense of identity in Ukraine fulfill get victory and its influence is great. Medium of some off error increase Ukraine indigenous culture of growth and indigenous doctrine, however indigenous doctrine and respectively nationalism has a substantive difference and difference, cannot confuse the two. Ukraine indigenous knowledge constitute an important is against a Russian performance in the process of negative effect and negative effect, its target is pursuit civilization diversity and the unity of the same, in the sense of identity Ross conditions pursuit position of Ukraine indigenous culture and Russian culture elegance equivalence, rejected the eve of Russian nationalism. It is different from the common people of, which was formed in the western Ukraine under the ruling of the nineteenth Century Olympic Day. Ukraine, respectively, the reasons for the bias is not strong enough to reflect the level of Russia's victory in Ukraine. The interaction between Russia and Ukraine develop intertwined between the two civilization, have a close relationship. 目录: |
