俄罗斯行政法模式转换探讨[俄语论文]

资料分类免费俄语论文 责任编辑:阿米更新时间:2017-05-19
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
摘要:(摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制,下载原文正常,内容请直接查看目录。)

1991年,社会主义的苏联在地球上消逝了,取而代之的,是实施本钱主义轨制的俄罗斯。社会性质的转变使前苏联的政治、经济体系体例产生了伟大变更,从曩昔那种高度集权的政治形式、完整国有化的经济形式,慢慢改变成一种具有俄罗斯特点的东方平易近主政治形式和市场经济形式。随同着政治经济体系体例的转轨,俄罗斯行政司法轨制的构建形式,也响应必定产生伟大变更,这一伟大变更的逻辑终点就是:1993年,俄罗斯宪法用一个全新的术语一“履行权”,代替了苏联一向运用了70多年的概念一“国度治理”。笔者以为,“履行权”这一新概念的提出和运用,是俄罗斯行政法形式转换的分水岭,意味着俄罗斯行政法抛开了苏联行政法“治理论”的形式,俄语论文题目,其重心由掩护国度治理权、制约国民权转向制约国度治理权、掩护国民权。俄罗斯行政法由此掀开了新的一页。俄罗斯行政法的构建是以履行权为基点的,“标准履行权的运动和感化,是行政法成长具无方向性的内容”。然则,从俄罗斯行政法成长的根本偏向性内容还难以预感俄罗斯行政法将选择甚么详细的形式。俄罗斯行政法选择掩护国民权力和制约履行权的价值目的,并主意经由过程实体规矩和法式规矩掌握行政行动进程及成果,俄语论文网站,这些不雅点与控权论的主意相顺应,显示了传统的控权论偏向。但从俄罗斯行政法所触及的行政法式中的国民介入权、对经济直接调控的古代手腕和非强迫性办法等外黑龙江年夜字硕土羊位论又一容看,俄罗斯行政法存在制约机制以外树立鼓励机制的偏向,这也是被传统“控权论”所排挤而与“均衡论”相容的。虽然难以预感俄罗斯行政法选择甚么样的形式,然则,俄罗斯行政法实际和理论已证实,其朝着古代法治的偏向成长是明白的和毋须置疑的。

Abstract:

In 1991, the socialist Soviet Union on earth disappeared, replaced by the implementation of the capitalist system of russia. Make the transition to the social nature of the former Soviet Union's political and economic system produced great change, from the past that kind of highly centralized political form, complete nationalization of the economy, slowly changing into a with Russian characteristics of eastern plain near the main political form, and the form of market economy. Along with the transition of the political and economic systems, construction form of Russian administrative judicial system, but also in response to will produce a great change, the logical end of this great change is in 1993, the Russian Constitution with a new term "perform in", instead of the Soviet Union always use the 70 years the concept of a "national government". The author thinks, "in performance" of this new concept is proposed and applied, conversion of Russian administrative law form the watershed, means that the Russian administrative law aside the form of administrative law in the Soviet Union "governance theory", its center of gravity by protect the country governance rights and restricting the national right to restrict national administrative power, protect civil rights. The Russian administrative law has opened a new page. The construction of the Russian administrative law is based on the right of performance. The movement and influence of the standard performance right is the content of the development of the administrative law ". What, then, from the fundamental deviation of the growth of the Russian administrative law is still difficult to have a sense of what the Russian administrative law will choose a detailed form. Russian administrative law chooses the cover of national power and control to fulfill the value of right to, and idea through the process entity rules and French rule master administrative action process and results, adapt to the idea of the elegant and the right to control, showing the bias of traditional control. But the Russian administrative law involves administrative procedures in the national right to intervene, the ancient wrist to direct economic regulation and non compulsive measures endures Heilongjiang large Shuo soil sheep bit on a content, the Russian administrative law are restricting mechanism outside to establish incentive mechanism bias, which is the traditional "control right theory" excluded and compatible with the "balance theory". Although the selection of what kind of form to a feeling of Russian administrative law. However, Russian administrative law theory and practice has confirmed that it toward the ancient rule of biased growth is clear and indubitable.

目录:

中文摘要   2-4   外文摘要   4   前言   23-24   第1章 行政法模式的概念及种类   24-30       1.1 行政法模式的概念   24-27           1.1.1 模式的概念   24-25           1.1.2 行政法模式是行政法的内、外在联系形式   25-27       1.2 行政法模式的种类   27-30           1.2.1 管理论   27-28           1.2.2 控权论   28           1.2.3 平衡论   28-30   第2章 俄罗斯行政法逻辑起点的转换   30-42       2.1 国家管理:苏联行政法的逻辑起点   31-35           2.1.1 苏联行政法的概念、目的及影响   31-33           2.1.2 苏联时期国家管理的概念及其与行政法的关系   33-35       2.2 执行权:俄罗斯行政法的逻辑起点   35-42           2.2.1 执行权的含义   35-36           2.2.2 俄罗斯行政法逻辑起点转换的宪法依据及其转换原因   36-40           2.2.3 执行权与国家管理的相互关系   40-42   第3章 执行权:行政法规范的中心   42-57       3.1 苏联行政法规范的重心   42-53       3.2 俄罗斯行政法规范的重心   53-57   第4章 执行权:行政法模式构建的基点   57-71   第5章 俄罗斯行政法理论模式难以确定   71-73       5.1 俄罗斯行政法表现出传统的控权论倾   71       5.2 俄罗斯行政法部分观点与“平衡论”相容   71-73   注释   73-84   参考文献   84-87   后记   87-88   致谢词   88  

免费论文题目: