| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 环绕着俄罗斯公有化成绩，一直存在着剧烈的争辩。那末该若何准确对待俄罗斯的公有化？笔者经由过程实证考核公有化对俄罗斯一切制关系、微不雅经济绩效及微观经济运转发生的作用，提醒出公有化的经济效应，然后联合社会政治后果对俄罗斯公有化的成效停止了综合评价；笔者还测验考试着对公有化进程中涌现的带有广泛性的成绩停止归结与总结，并据此对我国的公司改造提出建议。全文由六章构成，重要内容以下：第一章扼要引见了俄罗斯公有化的概略，概述了俄经济轨制的汗青演化，剖析了公有化政策出台的缘由，并简单描写了公有化进程中履行的政策办法、措施办法及停顿情形。我们以为，俄罗斯之所以选择了年夜范围疾速公有化计划，更主要的缘由在于平易近主派的政治好处。但为完成政治目标而履行敏捷公有化政策也为后来的各类抵触埋下了伏笔。第二章考核了俄罗斯一切制关系的更改情形，并对俄的本钱主义形式从比拟剖析的角度停止了商量。年夜范围的产权转移带来产业关系的基本性变更，俄罗斯在很短的时光内就树立了以公有制为基本的多元混杂一切制格式。从股分本钱一切权角度看，俄年夜范围公有化过程已根本停止，国度已根本加入了竞争性行业。虽然传播鼓吹公有化是在全平易近平分配产业的措施，但通俗国民现实上具有的产业份额非常无限；公司职工，特别是治理者在公有化进程中取得了最年夜的利益。从一切制构造看，俄国已奠基了本钱主义轨制的经济基本，但从股分本钱产权关系考核，还很难将俄罗斯归入英美形式或欧洲年夜陆形式。第三章实证考核了公有化公司的绩效状态，并剖析了分歧一切制企事迹效差别及公有化公司效益未能明显改良的缘由，进而对过渡经济中公有产权与效力之间的关系成绩作了总结。经由过程比拟发明，竞争性行业中公有公司具有较好的绩效表示，但在连续经济危机的配景下，公有产权的效力优势很难充足施展。由此得出结论，转型时代为改良公司运营事迹，安康、稳固的微观经济情况相当主要，这从一个正面否认了年夜范围公有化的公道性。第四章从公有化角度商量了俄罗斯转轨以来微观经济掉衡的缘由，提醒了微不雅改革形式对微观经济运转的感化机制。年夜范围公有化这一改造计划自己包括着激烈的损坏性，并且它还与筹划体系体例的遗产和其他改造办法产生剧烈的抵触，这些身分互相交错、感化，必定要带来消极的微观经济后果。本章的剖析注解，公有化无助于处理转型期的微观成绩，它只会加重微观经济的动乱。第五章根据后面的研究成果对俄罗斯公有化成效停止了综合评价，并对公有化进程中涌现的一些成绩停止了剖析与总结。我们重要以经济后果为权衡尺度，并将微不雅效益与微观稳固付与最年夜权重，一切制变更只是作为一个中央目的或手腕介入评价，俄语论文，依据这类评价办法，我们以为俄的公有化是不胜利的。形成这类成果的缘由很庞杂，但指点思惟的误差是基本缘由。本章还专门就公有化进程中涌现的带有广泛意义的成绩停止了剖析，并从中总结出一些纪律性的熟悉，这为下一章提出对中国的自创奠基了基本。第六章起首概述了中国微不雅改造过程及其结果，并比拟了中俄两国微不雅改造的差异，然后联合俄公有化剖析了我国产权改造的一些成绩。作者以为，俄语论文，两国微不雅改造计谋分歧在很年夜水平上是由轨制、思惟与实际配景的差别形成的。产权改革方面，俄罗斯的改造更完全，对旧轨制的保存水平较小。从改造的成果上看，中国的改造并未摇动私有制的主体位置，而公有化则完全摧毁了国有制在俄经济中的统治位置；中国的改造带动了经济增加、综合国力加强与国民生涯程度的改良，而俄国的公有化则获得了完整相反的后果。最初，笔者联合俄国公有化理论对我国产权改造中的一些成绩提出了本身的意见。 Abstract: Around the Russian public performance, there has been a fierce debate. So how to accurately treat the Russian public? The empirical assessment of public ownership of the means of production for all ties to Russia, micro macroeconomic performance and micro economic operation effect, to remind the economic effect of public via and effectiveness of combined with social and political consequences of Russian public stopped comprehensive evaluation. The author also test the of emerging in the process of socialization with extensive achievements summed and summarized, and accordingly to our country enterprise reform proposals. A compendium of the article consists of six chapters, an important part of the following: the first chapter briefly introduce the Russian public ownership of the means of production, an overview of the history of Russian economic system evolution and analysis of the public policy reasons, and simple description of the performance of the public ownership of the means of production in the process of policy measures, method and pause situation. We believe that the reason why Russia chose a large range of rapid public plans, the main reason lies in the political benefits of the Democratic party. But for political goals and fulfill the public policy for agile later all kinds of conflict foreshadowed. In the second chapter, I examine the change of the relationship between Russia and Russia, and from the point of view of comparative analysis. The scope of the transfer of property rights to bring the basic changes in industrial relations, Russia in a very short period of time to establish a public ownership as the basic multiple mixed ownership format. From the point of view of joint-stock capital all right, Russian large-scale process of privatization has been completely stopped, the country has been completely joined the competition in the industry. Although the dissemination of advocating public ownership of the means of production is in the plain nearly flat industry allocation method, but popular national reality with the share of industry is very limited; for enterprise employees, especially managers in the socialization process made the most of the eve of the interests. From the perspective of the structure of all, Russia has laid a foundation for the capitalist system of the economic basic, but from joint-stock capital property right relation assessment, it is difficult to will Russia belong to Anglo American or European continent form. The third chapter is the empirical examination of the performance status of enterprises of public ownership of the means of production, and analyzes the reason all differences of business performance difference and the enterprises of public ownership of the means of production efficiency can not obviously improved, then, it summarizes the transition economy between public property and effect relations. Compared with the invention, the public enterprise has better performance in the competitive industry, but in the continuous economic crisis with the background, the effectiveness of public property rights is difficult to fully display. It is concluded that the transformation of the times for the improvement of business operations deeds, Ankang, a solid micro economic situation is quite important, which from a positive denial of the scope of the scope of public justice. In the fourth chapter, from the perspective of public ownership, we discuss the reason why the micro economy is out of balance since the transition of Russia, and it is also a reminder of the reform of the micro economy. Scope of the eve of the public ownership of the means of the transformation plan themselves, including a fierce damage, and it also and planning systems of heritage and other reform measures produced violent conflict, these factors are intertwined, probation, must bring negative micro economic consequences. Analysis of this chapter, the public will not help to deal with the transition period of the micro results, it will only add to the micro economic turmoil. The fifth chapter based on the results of the research behind the comprehensive evaluation of the results of the Russian public, and the public in the process of the emergence of some of the results of the analysis and summary. Our important economic consequences as balance scale and micro Ya benefit and micro solid entrusts with the largest weight. All these things change only as a central purpose or wrist involved in the evaluation, according to the evaluation methods, we thought the privatization of Russia is not the victory. The reason for the formation of such results is very complex, but the error is the basic reason for pointing. This chapter also specifically on the emerging in the process of the emergence of a wide range of significance of the analysis, and summed up some of the discipline of the familiar, which for the next chapter of China's own foundation. In the sixth chapter, the transformation process and the result of China's Micro transformation are summarized, and the similarities and differences between China and Russia are compared. Then, the results of the reform of property rights in our country are analyzed. The author believes that the two countries to transform strategic differences in a very large level is the difference between the system, thinking and the actual scene of the formation of the difference. Reform of property rights, the transformation of Russia more completely, the preservation of the old rail system is smaller. From the point of view of the results of the transformation, China's reform did not shake the subject position of private ownership, and public ownership of the means of production is completely destroyed state ownership in the Russian economy dominant position; China's reform drive the economic increase and strengthen the comprehensive national strength and the people's living standards improved, and Russia's privatization has obtained the complete opposite consequences. At first, the author put forward his own opinion on the achievements of the reform of property rights in China by the combination of the theory of public ownership. 目录: |
