| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 《三毛钱小说》中的故事产生在1902年，那时正值本钱主义向垄断本钱主义过渡的时代。是以，小说所表示的主要主题即为本钱的积聚。以往的剖析都把小说中所反应的马克思主义本钱实际作为研究重点，依据这一实际，临盆材料的占领情形决议了社会关系的构成；本钱的积聚源于对别人的盘剥。作为一个马克思主义者，布莱希特也确切在小说中保持了这一不雅点，他在小说的最初一章借小说中人物兵士费康比表述了这一不雅点：本钱的增长是在盘剥别人的基本上完成的。马克思主义的本钱实际提醒了本钱主义盘剥的实质，盘剥者和被盘剥者之间的抵触是其研究重点。但是风趣的是，小说最初一章之前的描述重点都不是这一抵触，而是小说的两个中间人物麦奇思和皮丘姆树立本身的贸易帝国，并使之正当化的进程。在这一进程中他们不只要占领临盆材料还要获得其他任何和他们生意有关的资本，以在本身的贸易规模和与敌手的竞争中取得社会位置。在这一进程中，证实本身本钱的正当性也是必弗成少的。从这一点来看，德语论文题目，小说中所反应的实际超越了马克思主义本钱实际的规模。在这一假定下涌现了两个成绩，也就是：两个重要人物为了保持和获得其在运动规模内的社会位置都须要积聚哪些资本？和，他们如何能力够使本身积聚的本钱和在这一进程中构成的权力关系获得社会的认可？为了答复这两个成绩，德语论文范文，本文选择了布尔迪厄的实际。根据他的实际，社会个别在特定的规矩下争取各类情势的本钱（好比，经济、文明、社会、和意味本钱）。在竞争中取得更多本钱的人将权利集中在本身四周，构成了权利中间，同时也构成了特别的权利关系。这类人与人之间力气比较的关系被布尔迪厄称作场。每一个场都有本身绝对自力的运转措施。是以，这篇论文的个中一个目的就是剖析小说中两个场一也就是“B连锁市肆”和“行乞业”一构成的进程。本文的另外一个目的是研究这两个贸易的正当化进程。根据布尔迪厄的实际，每种本钱都有其可感知而且正当的情势，布尔迪厄将这类本钱情势称为意味本钱。作为其他本钱的正当情势，意味本钱获得社会的认可。获得意味本钱后，在本钱争取中构成的权利关系也能获得社会的认可。这意味着，在物资层面积聚的本钱和在本钱积聚进程中构成的权力关系必需经由过程响应的意味本钱的获得在意味层面起感化。换句话说，它们必需获得社会的认可。本文以这一实际为基本剖析文本拟证实：个别的社会位置和个别间的权利关系不只由临盆材料的占领情形所决议，它们还要获得社会的认可并终究在社会的意味层面起感化。 Abstract: "Thirty cents fiction" in the story happened in 1902, when capitalism to monopoly capitalism transition era. The main theme of the novel is the accumulation of capital. Previous analysis of the reaction in the novels of the Marxist capital actual as a research focus, according to the actual, occupation of parturient material resolution social relations; capital accumulation source in the exploitation of others. As a Marxist, Brecht exactly maintained this indecent point in the novel. In his novels the first chapter by characters in the novel soldier fee combe expressed this indecent point: the cost of growth is in the basic completion of the exploitation of others. The capital of Marxism physical reminder of the essence of capitalist exploitation, exploitation of the and exploitation between conflict is the research focus. But interesting is that novel first chapter focus on the description of the is not the conflict, but novel two characters in the middle Mcs and Pichu Tom set up own trading empire, and the legitimacy of the process. In the process of them not as long as the occupation of parturient materials but also to obtain any of their business on the capital, in the trade scale and with the rival's competition to obtain social position. In this process, it is necessary to confirm the legitimacy of its own costs will be less. From this point of view, the reality of the novel in which the reaction goes beyond the actual scale of the Marx doctrine. Under this assumption, there are two results, namely: two important people in order to maintain and obtain their social position in the scale of the movement which need to accumulate what capital? And how can they be able to make their own accumulation of capital and in the process of gaining social recognition of the power relationship? In order to answer the two results, this paper chooses the actual bourdieu. According to his practice, the social individual in the specific rules for the various forms of capital (for example, economic, cultural, social, and means the cost). People who get more capital in the competition will focus on themselves, constitute the middle of the right, but also constitute a special right relationship. The relationship between the comparative strength and is called Bourdieu field. Every field has its own absolute operation method. Is in this thesis a medium to is the analysis of novels in two field also is "B chain shops" and "begging industry" the process. Another purpose of this paper is to discuss the justification process of these two trade. According to Bourdieu's actual, each kind of cost have the perception but also the proper situation, Bourdieu will the cost situation called cost means. As a legitimate form of other costs, means that the cost of access to social recognition. Get means capital, in the capital to fight for the rights of the relationship can also be recognized by society. This means that the cost of the material and the accumulation of capital in the process of capital accumulation in the process of the relationship between the need to respond to the meaning of the cost of the means to play a role. In other words, they must be recognized by society. In this paper the actual basic analysis of the text intends to confirm: individual social position and individual rights not only by birth materials occupy the resolution, they also get social recognition and eventually in the mean levels of society play a role. 目录: |
