| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，德语论文网站，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 1944年9月一1945年10月，以美国为首的联盟国在德国实行了反亲善政策。反亲善政策制止盟军兵士以任何措施接触德公民众。本文试图以反亲善政策作为切入点，略论个人罪恶的不雅念在战后联盟国改革德国社会的过程中发生的作用。论文引述的史料重要是美国官方的档案和亲历者的回想等。全文分为引言、注释和结语三个部门。注释包含三个章节的内容。引言概述了成绩认识和研究意义，同时对国际外研究状态停止了扼要评价。第一章引见反亲善政策的缘起。反亲善政策的思惟本源是德国的“个人罪恶”。这类不雅念脱胎于二战时代美国国际对德国汗青成绩的论争。它指控全部德国人都必需为纳粹的侵犯和暴行承当罪恶。美国当局根据这类思惟制订了反亲善政策。第二章商量盟军在实行反亲善政策时遭受的窘境。反亲善政策试图经由过程制止友邦武士以任何措施接触德公民众，德语论文范文，给德国人一个经验。不外，盟军兵士对个人罪恶缺少认同，是以他们没有严厉遵照反亲善政策。最初，友邦管束委员会自愿撤消了反亲善政策。第三章剖析了德国社会对反亲善政策的反响。因为友邦武士和德国人之间的亲善运动众多成灾，反亲善政策没有促使德国社会认清本身罪恶。结语指出：由于个人罪恶不雅念自己的过火和盟军履行反亲善政策时的掉策，反亲善政策没有与日俱增地处理德国的罪恶成绩。总而言之，反亲善政策在战后联盟国改革和重建德国社会的过程中发生了消极作用。 Abstract: In September 1944 October 1945, to American led coalition government carried out anti fraternization policies in germany. To stop the Allied soldiers anti fraternization policies in any way public engagement. This paper attempts to anti fraternization policies as a starting point, analysis of personal sin indecent read occurred in the postwar reform of the union of German society. The paper quoted an important historical data is USA official archives and witness the recall. The full text is divided into three sections: introduction, comment and conclusion. The comment contains three chapters. The introduction summarizes the significance of the research and the significance of the research. At the same time, the status of the international and foreign research has been stopped. The first chapter introduces the origin of anti fraternization policies. Anti fraternization policies thought origin is Germany's "personal sin". This concept originated in the debate on German historical achievement America international World War II era. It accused all Germans for Nazi aggression and atrocities must bear the sin. USA authorities to formulate anti fraternization policies according to this kind of thought. The second chapter discuss the allies in the implementation of anti fraternization policies when suffering the dilemma. Anti fraternization policies through the process of trying to stop the AIA warrior in any way to contact German citizens, a German experience. However, the Allied soldiers lack the personal identification is to sin, they did not strictly comply with the anti fraternization policies. First, AIA Management Committee compelled to cancel the anti fraternization policies. The third chapter analyzes the German social repercussions on anti fraternization policies. Because of the AIA warrior between the Germans and the goodwill many disaster, anti fraternization policies not prompted German society to recognize the crime itself. The epilogue points out that due to personal sin indecent read his burned and allied anti fraternization policies to fulfill the off policy, anti fraternization policies did not grow with each passing day processing results to the evils of Germany. To make a long story short, anti fraternization policies had negative effects in the process of postwar alliance reform and reconstruction of society in germany. 目录: 摘要 6-7 ABSTRACT 7 引言 9-19 一、问题缘起 9-10 二、学术回顾 10-17 (一) 国际探讨动态 11-15 (二) 国内探讨动态 15-17 三、论文结构与史料来源 17-19 第一章 反亲善政策的起源 19-49 第一节 “希特勒即德国!”--艾米尔·路德维希和反亲善构想的提出 19-26 第二节 德国的三张脸谱--战时美国社会对德国问题的争论 26-38 第三节 反亲善政策的酝酿出台 38-47 总结 47-49 第二章 盟军的反亲善困局 49-108 第一节 反亲善政策的颁布和强化 50-58 第二节 反亲善宣传和教育 58-71 第三节 盟军士兵眼中的德国形象 71-80 第四节 “65美元问题”--违令亲善活动的泛滥成灾 80-100 第五节 反亲善政策的放宽与取消 100-106 总结 106-108 第三章 反亲善政策和德国人 108-130 第一节 德国人对反亲善政策的反应 108-118 第二节 反亲善政策的后遗症--战后德国的亲善问题 118-129 总结 129-130 结语 130-137 附录：《德国口袋指南》 137-154 参考文献 154-160 后记 160 |
