| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，德语论文，德语论文网站，内容请直接查看目录。） 好心获得轨制不是一个新的实际,在我国,动产的好心获得年夜家都曾经很熟习了,然则不动产的好心获得倒是一个极新的范畴。源于日耳曼法“以手护手”准绳的好心获得实际的法理基本是物权公示公信准绳,这一轨制的研究在赓续深刻。以往的好心获得轨制更多存眷的是动产,跟着不动产的主要性一日千里,不动产生意业务也变得频仍起来,生意业务中的抵触也就增多了,最凸起的照样真正不动产权力人和气意第三人之间的成绩。然则在处理这一抵触的时刻,我们没有司法条则可以援用,没有司法标准可以遵照。2017年3月出台的《物权法》把好心获得轨制扩至不动产,为处理这一成绩供给了司法根据,无疑也是给我邦交易运动的顺遂停止和社会经济的成长供给了无力的赞助。本文从比拟法的角度动身,比较中国和德国的不动产好心获得,以此为切入点,剖析完美在我国的国情下不动产好心获得轨制应该若何成长。全文主体部门分为四部门：第一部门解析不动产好心获得学说的实际组成。给不动产好心获得中的相干实际下界说,好比作甚不动产,作甚好心。深刻剖析好心获得轨制的实际渊源,法理基本和其实用成绩。第二部门论述不动产好心获得的立法比拟。包含理论基本,价值基本和司法条则划定方面的比较。在这一部门中,中国与德国睁开了比拟,可以更完全的懂得这一学说的基本。第三部门剖析不动产好心获得的组成要件和司法后果。经由过程中国与德国的比拟,有些是类似的,有些是分歧的。找出它们的类似,剖析它们的分歧。第四部门剖析我国不动产好心获得的缺乏,提出完美的建议。从中国本身对此轨制划定的法条停止剖析,自创德国的成熟体系体例,并联合本身现实,供给完美看法,目标是使这一轨制在中国生根抽芽,茁壮生长,为社会主义经济扶植进献本身的力气。 Abstract: Kindly get rail system is a new practice. In our country, real estate kind get Nianye home was very familiar with the. However the dynamic kind obtained is a new category. Source in the Germanic law "to hand in hand," the principle of good obtain actual legal principle is the basic principle of public summons and public trust of real right, the track of research in ceaseless deep. Get past the good track of more concern is the real estate, followed by real production of rapid, real estate business has become frequent up, business conflict also increased, the most outstanding still really real property power and gas between the third party and performance. But in this moment we have no conflict, justice is not justice can be used, can follow the standard. In March 2017 introduced the "real law" the good access to rail reamed to real estate, to deal with the results supply the justice basis, undoubtedly also give my state trading movement smoothly stop and social economic growth supply the weakness of sponsorship. This article from the perspective of comparative law, comparative Chinese and Germany's real estate kind, as a starting point, analysis of perfection in China real estate system should be how to get good growth. The main text is divided into four departments: the first Department of real estate sector analysis theory to obtain good actual composition. For real estate in the actual lower bound obtained good coherence that is why real estate, what kind of. Kindly get the actual origin profound analysis system, and its basic legal achievements. Second discussion of the real estate sector has obtained good legislation. Contains the basic theory, basic value and judicial aspects are delineated. In this section, Chinese with the German open match, can more fully understand the basic theory. The third part analyzes the real elements and judicial consequences obtained good production. Through the process of China and Germany compared, some are similar, some differences. Find out what they like, analyze their differences. The fourth part of the analysis of China's real estate lack kind of put forward perfect suggestions. From China itself this rail system defined law analysis, homemade German style of a mature system, and combined with the reality itself, supply perfect view, the goal is to make the rail system in China sprout and grow healthy and strong, as the socialist economy builds into offer an own strength. 目录: 摘要 4-5 Abstract 5-6 1 引言 9-12 1.1 选题背景及意义 9 1.2 文献综述 9-10 1.3 探讨措施和主要探讨内容 10-11 1.4 论文新见解及不足 11-12 2 不动产善意取得制度的理论 12-22 2.1 不动产善意取得制度的概念 12-14 2.1.1 不动产的概念界定 12-13 2.1.2 善意取得的概念 13-14 2.2 不动产善意取得制度的理论学说 14-19 2.2.1 不动产善意取得制度的理论渊源 14-15 2.2.2 不动产善意取得制度的法理基础 15-19 2.3 不动产善意取得制度的适用 19-22 3 不动产善意取得制度的立法比较 22-33 3.1 不动产善意取得制度的实践基础 22-24 3.1.1 中国法 22-23 3.1.2 德国法 23-24 3.2 不动产善意取得制度的价值基础 24-27 3.2.1 中国法 24-26 3.2.2 德国法 26-27 3.3 不动产善意取得制度的立法与实践 27-33 3.3.1 中国的立法与实践 27-31 3.3.2 德国的立法与实践 31-33 4 不动产善意取得制度的构成条件及法学效果 33-42 4.1 中国的不动产善意取得制度的构成条件 33-37 4.1.1 登记名义人名为有权处分,实则无权处分 33-34 4.1.2 受让人在受让物权时是善意的 34-36 4.1.3 物权转移是通过合理价格转让的 36-37 4.1.4 转让的不动产必须已经进行了变更登记 37 4.2 德国的不动产善意取得制度的构成条件 37-40 4.2.1 处分行为为法学行为,且为无因性 37-38 4.2.2 受让人为善意 38-39 4.2.3 处分行为须为交易行为,还可包括无偿 39-40 4.2.4 小结 40 4.3 不动产善意取得制度的法学效果 40-42 4.3.1 善意第三人的利益保护 40-41 4.3.2 真正权利人的利益保护 41-42 5 我国不动产善意取得制度之完善 42-47 5.1 我国《物权法》之缺陷 42-44 5.1.1 不动产登记体系不完备 42-43 5.1.2 我国《物权法》之规定 43-44 5.2 立法完善 44-47 5.2.1 健全不动产登记 44-46 5.2.2 细化司法解释 46-47 6 结论 47-49 参考文献 49-50 致谢 50-51 个人简历 在学期间的学术论文与探讨成果 51 |
