汉语量词“个”与越南语“Chiec,cai”对比探讨Chinese and Vietnamese quantifiers "a" "Chiec, a comparative study of Cai" 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 古代汉语和越南语的量词既有必定的分歧性，又有很多差别。越南先生在汉语进修进程中，因为没有控制好两者的差异，所以他们在运用古代汉语量词时，常常会涌现一些毛病。“个”和“chi（e）c，cái”分离是古代汉语和越南语运用规模最广、频率最高的量词，对于两者的差异关系，今朝还没有体系性的研究结果，这为越南先生更好地习得“个”带来了必定的艰苦。为懂得决这个成绩，本文重要对古代汉语量词“个”与越南语量词“chi（e）c，越语论文范文，cái”睁开比较研究，并在此基本上，联合越南先生习得“个”的偏误，做一些教授教养战略上的商量。本文的重要内容以下 （一）引见汉语和越南语量词的概念及相干研究现状，解释本论文的选题启事与意义、研究对象、研究办法及语料起源。 （二）古代汉语量词“个”与越南语“chi（e）c，cái”的比较研究，从运用规模、构造情势、句法功效三个方面，剖析两者的差异。在运用规模上，详细剖析了三种情形一是汉语量词“个”与越南语“chi（e）c，cái”都可使用和都不克不及运用的情形；二是只能用汉语量词“个”不克不及用越南语“chi（e）c，cái”的情形；三是只能用越南语“chi（e）c，cái”不克不及用汉语量词“个”的情形。构造情势上，重要比较剖析了汉语量词“个”与越南语“chi（e）c，cái”的堆叠情势、省略情势，和跟表现举措行动的词语停止组合的相干情势。在句法功效方面，本文停止比较了两者在充任定语、状语、补语、谓语、主语和宾语等六种句法成份上的个性与差别。 （三）越南先生运用古代汉语量词“个”的偏误考核。经由过程问卷查询拜访的统计数据，归结越南先生在汉语量词“个”习得进程中罕见的偏误类型，联合比较研究的发明，剖析偏误的缘由，在此基本上提出本身有关的教授教养建议。 Abstract: Ancient Chinese and Vietnamese quantifiers have certain differences, and there are a lot of differences. In the process of learning Chinese in Vietnam, and because of similarities and differences did not control them, so they used in ancient Chinese quantifiers, often there will be some problems. Separation of "a" and "Chi C (E), C, I" is the ancient Chinese and Vietnamese is the most widely applied on a large scale, frequency highest quantifier, with regard to both the similarities and differences between, there is not system research results, this is Mr. Vietnam better acquisition of the "a" bring the inevitable hard. To understand this result, the important ancient Chinese quantifiers and Vietnamese Quantifier "Chi C (E), C, I opened his comparative study, and on this basis, combined with Vietnam Mr. acquisition of" a "bias, do some teaching strategies to discuss. An important part of this article, the following (a) introduce Chinese and Vietnamese quantifier concept and relevant research situation, explain the topic reason and meaning, research object, research methods and data origin. (II) ancient Chinese measure word "a" with the Vietnamese "Chi C (E), C, I" comparative study, from the three aspects of the application scale, situation structure, syntactic function, analysis of both similarities and differences. In the application of the scale, a detailed analysis of the Chinese quantifiers and Vietnamese "Chi C (E), C, I can use and cannot be applied to the case is one of three kinds of situations; second only to Chinese Quantifier" a "means less than with the Vietnamese" Chi C (E), C, I "; the third is the only Vietnamese" Chi C (E), C, I "means less than with the Chinese quantifiers" a "of the situation. Tectonic situation important comparisons and analyses the Chinese quantifiers and Vietnamese "Chi C (E), C, I" stack situation and the omission of the situation, and stop combined with words of performance actions of the relevant situation. In the syntactic function, this article compared the two acted as attribute, adverbial, complement, predicate, subject and object, such as six kinds of syntactic components of personality and differences. (three) Vietnam Mr. application of ancient Chinese Quantifier "Ge" error assessment. Through process questionnaire visit statistics, attributed Mr. Vietnam in Chinese Quantifier "Ge" acquisition process of rare types of errors, combined with a comparative study of invention, an analysis of causes for errors, on the basis of their teaching suggestions proposed. 目录: |
