作 者：刘培杰[1] LIU Pei-Jie （College of Chinese Language ＆ Culture,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875 ,China） 机构地区：[1]北京师范大学汉语文化学院,北京100875 出 处：《云南师范大学学报：对外汉语教学与探讨版》2017年第2期17-25,共9页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Teaching and Research of Chinese as A Foreign Language 摘 要：文章从汉泰对比的角度对汉语＂动—名＂离合词＂A＋过＋B＂的形式和意义进行了略论,认为从形式上来看,汉语动态助词＂过＂与泰语助动词＂■＂对应时,＂■＂位于泰语词或短语之前,而与形容词＂■＂对应时,＂■＂则位于泰语词或短语之后;从意义上来看,汉语动态助词＂过1＂和泰语形容词＂■＂的意义基本相同,即表＂完毕＂义;汉语动态助词＂过2＂和泰语助动词＂＂的意义基本相同,即表＂经验＂义。This paper focuses on a contrastive analysis of the forms and meanings of the verb-noun separable words in＂A＋guo＋B＂structures between Chinese and Thai.In terms of form,Chinese aspect particle＂guo＂is equivalent to the Thai auxiliary verb ＂■＂ which is located before other Thai words or phrases.When equivalent to the adjective ＂■＂,＂■＂is located after other Thai words or phrases.In terms of meaning,the meanings of the Chinese aspect particle＂guo1＂and Thai adjective＂■＂are basically the same,which mean＂completion＂;while the meanings of the Chinese aspect particle＂guo2＂and Thai auxiliary verb ＂■＂are also basically the same,which mean＂experience＂. 关 键 词：汉语 ，泰语论文，泰语论文题目 |
