| 虽然内含竞争政策议题的“新加坡议题”已于2004年从多哈议程中撤消,6年来WTO框架下竞争法的国际调和任务也一向停止不前,但全球经济一体化带来的跨国反竞争成绩所形成的负面作用一向遭到人们的普遍存眷,完整可以预感,WTO框架下构建同一的多边竞争规矩的会谈势必再次登上国际舞台。在这类配景下,充足、深刻地研究竞争法国际调和的各个方面,对于我国完美反垄断法、胜利介入将来多边会谈有侧重要的实际意义。除引言与结论外,本文共分5部门：第一部门阐述了WTO框架下竞争法国际调和的实际基本,即经济全球化惹起的新型市场壁垒——私家跨国反竞争行动给列国带来的困扰,和WTO框架下商业与竞争政策的互动关系对竞争法国际调和的推进感化,最初笔者指出了最直接缘由：竞争法的域外实用带来了很年夜的消极作用。第二部门为WTO框架外竞争法国际调和的造诣与评价,一些国度在充足熟悉到零丁规制跨国反竞争行动的各种缺点后,开端走上与他国在各个层面停止协作的途径,并为此做了很年夜尽力。本章具体引见了列国在双边、区域和多边调和机制上的尽力,并总结了其所获得的结果及缺乏的地方。第三部门引见了WTO框架下竞争法国际调和机制成长的汗青与现状。WTO是睁开竞争法多边调和最合适的场合已成为一个国际共鸣,本章具体回想了国际社会在ITO-GATT阶段建构多边竞争规矩的汗青,归结了WTO协定中现有有关竞争的规矩,最初引见了WTO商业与竞争政策任务组的成长过程。第四部门为WTO框架下竞争法国际调和的能够性剖析,环绕着“竞争政策能否应当引入WTO,和引入后应用何种形式会谈”的成绩,本章具体剖析了列国的立场,总结了四种国际社会中普遍评论辩论的形式,然后对其予以评析并提出了笔者以为最好的形式。第五部门容身国际,剖析WTO框架下竞争法国际调和对我国所发生的作用。本章概述了我国反垄断法的立法现状,并提出了我国应对将来的多边会谈的所应持的立场及对策。 Abstract: Although containing competition policy issues in the "Singapore issues" have been in 2004 from the Doha agenda undo, 6 years under the framework of WTO competition law international coordination task would have been stopped, but the negative effects of global economic integration brings the transnational anti competition result has always been vulnerable to the people's widespread concern and they can premonition, under the framework of WTO building talks with a multilateral competition rules will once again boarded on the international stage. Under the background of this kind of match, the sufficient and profound research on the international harmonization of competition law in all aspects, the perfect anti monopoly law, the victory in the future multilateral talks has important practical significance. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the paper is divided into five departments: Department first expounds the WTO under the framework of competition law international coordination of basic theory, that is economic globalization causes the new market barriers: the interactive relationship between private transnational anti competition actions to the nations to bring trouble, and under the framework of WTO trade and competition policy of competition law international coordination to promote the role of, I initially pointed out the most direct reason: Competition Law extraterritorial application brings the very big negative effect. The second department is accomplished and evaluation of WTO and international competition law international coordination of, in some countries the enough understanding to the shortcomings of Lingding the regulation of transnational anti competition actions, began to walk up and his country at all levels to carry out cooperation way, and so do the very big effort. This chapter specifically describes the countries in bilateral, regional and multilateral coordination mechanisms to try, and summed up the results obtained and the lack of place. The third section introduces the history and current situation of the development of the international harmonization mechanism of competition law under the framework of WTO. The WTO is open competition law multilateral reconcile the most appropriate occasion has become an international consensus, this chapter specific recall the international community in ITO-GATT construct multilateral competition rules of history, summed up the WTO agreement in the existing competition rule, initially introduced the WTO trade and competition policy task group of the growth process. The fourth part under the framework of WTO competition law international harmonization to analysis, surrounded by "competition policy can be introduced into the WTO, and introduced the use of what form the talks," the results, this chapter specific analysis of the position of the nations, summed up the four international society generally review the debate of the form and the evaluates and put forward the thought that the best form of. The Fifth Department for international, analysis of WTO under the framework of competition law international coordination have impact on china. This chapter outlines the status quo of China's anti-monopoly law, and puts forward the position and Countermeasures of our country to deal with the future of the multilateral talks. 目录: |
