| 英国古代文学的经典法国中尉的女人,从1969年问世以来活着界规模发生了普遍而耐久的作用。从小说揭橥至今,许多小说评论家都在尽力对其魅力停止解读。有的以为小说反应了福尔斯的存在主义思惟;更多的人以为小说的魅力起源于后古代主义文学的叙事技能,究竟,多半20世纪的小说受后古代主义的作用颇深,斟酌到此小说的写作年月,本文试图从后古代主义群体中的领武士物——福柯所著的规训与处分中的权利不雅动手来解读法国中尉的女人中的各个权利地位的转换关系。查尔斯出生名门,又与朱门以后的狄娜定有婚约,在权利关系网里,他可谓是处于相对优势的位置。然则依据福柯的权力不雅权利是一种静态的收集关系。查尔斯的优势权利位置终究被推翻,进而处于各权力关系中的优势位置。萨拉,因为被人们广泛以为是法国中尉的性对象,而被置于社会的边沿地带,是以在权利关系网中,她处优势位置。但萨拉不甘永久处于压抑当中,她战略地运用权利关系的静态性,积极对抗各类压抑性的权利关系,终究变主动的权利位置为自动,完成了她的人生目的。叙事者在发明本身虚拟的故事时,时而以全知视角对人物停止略论,时而表现出本身的无法,不知人物所思;刚在十九世纪讲述那边所产生的事,又用古代的眼力重审二十世纪;自负地诬捏着虚拟的故事,却又表示出迟疑未定,不知故事该有那种开头。论述者立场的扭捏不定,解释论述者不再掌控论述的主宰权,在论述者与读者和论述者与叙事的权利关系网中,论述者已把主宰权让渡给了读者和小说,本身则处于主动的权利地位。经由过程对小说中各个权利地位的转换剖析,本文在必定水平上提醒并证明了权利是静态的社会关系网。在这类关系网中,一小我的权利位置有能够产生改变。 Abstract: The classic French Lieutenant's woman, the ancient Chinese literature, has had a widespread and lasting influence on the scale of the world since its inception in 1969. From the novel published so far, many critics are trying to stop the charm of interpretation. Some thought that the novel reflects Fowles's thoughts of existentialism; more people thought the charm of the novel originated in ancient literary narrative skills, exactly, most of the novels of the 20th century by the impact of modernism is quite deep, to consider here the novel writing date, right in this paper attempts from the ancient collectivism brought the warrior matter -- Foucault's "discipline and punishment" indecent begin to interpret the conversion relation between the French Lieutenant's woman in all the right position. Charles was born into a noble family and engagement with the Di Nading Zhumen later and in the right relationship, he described is in the relative position of. But according to Foucault's power is not the right to a static collection of relations. Charles's advantage position was overthrown, and then in the power relationship of the dominant position. Sara, because it was widely thought that the French Lieutenant's sexual objects, and was placed on the edge of the community, is in the right relationship network, she is in the dominant position. But Sara unwilling to permanently in the middle of repression, she has the right to apply the right relationship between the static nature, and actively fight against all kinds of repressive rights relations, after all, the right to change the active position of automatic, complete the purpose of her life. Narrator in to create their own virtual story, sometimes uses omniscient point of view on the character analysis, sometimes demonstrated itself cannot, characters do not know thinks; just tell there in the 19th century and ancient eyesight retrial in the 20th century; conceited slander the pinch a virtual story, but that the hesitate, I do not know the story of the beginning of that. Tweaked the arguer position, explains who no longer control deals with the right to dominate, in the narrative and discuss with readers and discusses the relations between the right network, the arguer have right to dominate the transfer to the reader and itself is in active position of rights. Through the process of the novels of the various rights of the status of the analysis, this paper in a certain level to remind and prove that the right is a static social network. In this kind of relation network, a person's right position can produce change. 目录: Acknowledgements 6-7 Abstract in English 7-8 Abstract in Chinese 9-10 Chapter One Introduction 10-13 1.1 Brief Introduction to John Fowles 10-11 1.2 Brief Summary of The French Lieutenant\'s Woman 11-13 Chapter Two Literature Review 13-20 2.1 The Social and Historical Significances of this Novel 13-14 2.2 The Existentialist Thoughts Embodied in the Novel 14-16 2.3 The Use of the Post-modern Writing Devices 16-20 Chapter Three Michel Foucault\'s Power View in Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison 20-27 3.1 Michel Foucault\'s Concept of Power 21-22 3.2 Michel Foucault\'s Power View in Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison 22-27 Chapter Four Power Position Shifts in The French Lieutenant\'s Woman in the Light of Foucault\'s Power View 27-46 4.1 Sarah\'s Power Position Shifts: from Inferiority to Superiority 27-34 4.1.1 Shifts between Sarah and Mrs. Talbot 27-28 4.1.2 Shifts between Sarah and Mrs. Poulteney/ the Community of Lyme 28-31 4.1.3 Shifts between Sarah and Charles 31-33 4.1.4 Sarah\'s Obtaining Superior Power Position 33-34 4.2 Charles\' Power Position Shifts: from Superiority to Inferiority 34-40 4.2.1 Shifts between Charles and Ernestina 35-36 4.2.2 Shifts between Charles and Sam 36-38 4.2.3 Shifts between Charles and Sarah 38-40 4.2.4 Charles\'s Finale: Degraded to Inferior Power Position 40 4.3 The Narrator\'s Power Position Shifts: from Dominant to Dominated 40-46 4.3.1 Shifts between the Narrator and the Fiction 40-43 4.3.1.1 Dominant Power Position of the Narrator 40-42 4.3.1.2 Dominated Power Position of the Narrator 42-43 4.3.2 Shifts between the Narrator and Readers 43-46 4.3.2.1 Dominant Power Position of the Narrator 43-44 4.3.2.2 Dominated Power Position of the Narrator 44-46 Chapter Five Conclusion 46-48 Notes 48-52 Bibliography 52-54 |
