| 约翰。福尔斯是现代英国文坛一颗残暴的明星，被以为是二十世纪后古代作家中出色的代表。其代表作捕蝶者，魔法师，法语毕业论文，法国中尉的女人一向遭到评论界的存眷和喜爱。福尔斯的法国中尉的女人被评论界称为是后古代的经典之作，许多学者从小说的主题和情势两年夜方面临其停止过研究，内容涵盖了该小说所表现的文学、哲学和迷信等多方面的价值；个中，有一些学者从互文性角度对该小说停止了商量。互文性是后古代主义文学写作手段的一个主要标记，后人研究该小说的互文性重要从互文手腕—拼贴、暗指、援用、戏拟、仿作动手，经由过程寻觅互文文原来源对其停止研究。该小说一个明显的特点是在每章节的后面至多有一到两个引文，引文的内容涵盖了维多利亚时代的哲学、迷信、文学、告白、平易近谣等很多方面，本文试从互文性的角度动手，从引文当选取最具代表性的三类引文—哲学、迷信、文学，从文学和哲学、文学和迷信、文学和文学三个方面建构起对话，商量法国中尉的女人中引文和注释的关系，并发明福尔斯经由过程注释中对人物的描绘和情节的描写对引文中所表现的哲学、迷信和文学思惟或赞同，或否决，或对其停止了弥补。福尔斯对马克思哲学思惟中的阶层奋斗的广泛存在性停止了确定，但对其所论述的反动实际却提出了质疑并对其停止了嘲讽；他确定了达尔文退化论中遗传与变异，和生计竞争和天然选择的实际，却否认其所表现的线性退化思惟；他确定并借用了传统文学的主题却质疑并否认了传统文学中的作家“天主”位置和读者附属位置。本文从互文性的角度动手，对引文和注释关系停止的商量，势必为对该小说中隐含的哲学、迷信和文学价值供给一条新的商量之路。 Abstract: John. Fowles is a star of the modern English literary world, which is considered as an excellent representative of the ancient writers after twentieth Century. His masterpiece, "the butterfly catcher", "the magician", "the French Lieutenant's Woman" has always been the focus of attention and love. John Fowles' the French Lieutenant's Woman "by critics called after the ancient classic works, many scholars from the novel themes and situations in which two of the eve of the party facing the stop seminars, covering the value of the novels, such as literature, philosophy and science; medium, there are some scholars from the Perspective of intertextuality of the novel stop to discuss. Intertextuality is after the ancient literature writing means a major label, later generations to study the novel of intertextuality is important from the wrist of intertextuality - Spell paste, allusion, invoke, parody, pastiche hands-on, through the process of looking for intertextual text source of its study. An obvious feature of the novel is in the back of each section has at most one to two citations, citation covers the Vitoria times philosophy, science, literature, advertising, folk and so on, this paper tries to start from the perspective of intertextuality, citation from selected the most representative three philosophy, science, literature citation, construct the dialogue from the three aspects of literature and philosophy, literature and science, literature and literature, discuss the relationship between "the French Lieutenant's Woman" in quotation and annotation, and the invention of Fowles through the description of the characters and plot of the process depicted comments on the citations in philosophy, superstition and literary thought or approval or veto, or to stop up. Falls on Marx's philosophical thought of class struggle exists widely has been determined, but opposition to the discussions of actual are questioned and the ridicule; he identified the Darwin's theory of evolution, heredity and variation, and livelihoods competition and natural selection, but denied that the performance of the linear degradation of thought; he was sure and borrow the traditional literature on the subject have questioned and denied the affiliated position in traditional literature writers "God" of the position and the reader. This paper begins with the perspective of the text, and discuss the relationship between quotation and annotation, which is bound to provide a new way to discuss the philosophical, scientific and literary value implied in this novel. 目录: Abstract（English） 4-5 Abstract（Chinese） 6-7 Contents 7-9 Chapter Ⅰ Introduction 9-12 Chaper Ⅱ Literature Review and Theoretical Basis 12-23 2.1 Previous Researches on The French Lieutenant’s Woman at Home and Abroad 12-18 2.1.1 Previous researches abroad 12-14 2.1.2 Previous researches at home 14-16 2.1.3 Previous researches from the aspect of intertextuality 16-18 2.2 Theoretical Basis in This Paper 18-23 ChapterⅢ Dialogue Between the Epigraphs and the Text 23-50 3.1 Dialogue Between Literature and Philosophy 24-31 3.1.1 Confirmation of social class struggle 25-28 3.1.2 Complement to social class struggle 28-29 3.1.3 Negation of theory of revolution 29-31 3.2 Dialogue between Literature and Science 31-44 3.2.1 Confirmation of heredity and variation and natural selection 31-38 3.2.2 Complement to struggle for existence and coevolution 38-41 3.2.3 Negation of vertical evolution 41-44 3.3 Dialogue Between Literature of the Nineteenth Century and Literature of the Twentieth Century 44-50 3.3.1 Confirmation of traditional themes 45-47 3.3.2 Complement to the traditional characterization 47-48 3.3.3 Negation of the traditional writing techniques 48-50 Chapter IV Conclusion 50-52 Acknowledgements 52-53 Works Cited 53-59 |
