| 本文拔取了20世纪初法国的德雷福斯事宜,以话语权这一符号权利作为切入点,依据常识分了对符号体系(说话、文字等)的运用情形的分歧对常识份子的社会脚色停止界说。在此界说下,笔者将常识分了重要的运动空间分为常识场域和公共范畴,进而对常识份子的社会脚色与话语权之间的关系停止剖析。这一关系剖析既包括话语权对分歧场域中常识份子社会脚色饰演的感化,也包括常识份子社会脚色对话语权的感化。个中拔取德雷福斯事宜作为案例,旨在借用经典的东方实例联合东方语境下的常识份子实际成长头绪,力争展示传统的常识份子出生之初的抽象,藉此对比当下常识份子社会脚色与话语权的成长静态并唤起常识界对传统常识份子精力的复归。本文的研究思绪在于以常识份子的社会脚色与话语权之间的关系为重要实际框架,以德雷福斯案件的配景与经由为根据,剖析“常识份子”社会脚色的发生与变更,及其与常识份子话语权的起源与决议身分之间的关系。笔者在对常识份子概念的周全梳理的条件下,经由过程对现存的各个汗青时代与分歧的国度中分歧常识配景的人对德雷福斯事宜剖析的文字资料和影象材料的比拟,试图将德雷福斯事宜作为一个详细的社会事宜,剖析其常识份子社会脚色与话语权之间的关系,和这一事宜中常识份子群体发生的构造性缘由。详细而言,经由过程对话语作为一种符号对象与社会理论行动的剖析,提醒其所包含的“软暴力”对常识份子群体社会脚色的发生和变更的感化,表示在德雷福斯事宜中则是我控告与示威书等文章或德雷福斯派的话语理论——庭审现场左拉的证词等对常识份子外部的脚色分层和常识份子配合体的社会脚色,及其与阶层的关系等方面的感化。同时,常识份子的社会脚色对其话语权的作用,不只包含在常识场域与公共场域的常识份子的社会脚色在德雷福斯事宜中对其话语权的数目和起源方面的作用,也包含对话语权与其他权利体系之间的关系的作用。经由过程对德雷福斯事宜中常识份子社会脚色与话语权之间的关系的剖析与总结,本文将德雷福斯事宜中的常识份子脚色作为一个常识份子群体的幻想模子,旨在对当下常识份子及其话语权的行驶发生必定的参照与启发意义。 Abstract: This paper selects the French at the beginning of the 20th century the Dreyfus matters and to the right of discourse in this symbol as a starting point, based on common sense points differences of symbol system (speaking and writing) application definition of intellectual roles in the society. In this definition, the common sense of the important motion space is divided into common sense field and in the public domain, and the relationship between the intellectual's social role and the right of discourse analysis. The analysis includes not only the right to speak the differences in the field of intellectual social roles played by impact, including the action of intellectual social roles of discourse right. Medium select Dreyfus matters as a case, aims to use classical Oriental combined with the examples of Oriental context of intellectuals of actual development clue, and strive to show the growth of traditional intellectual was born at the beginning of the abstraction, thereby compared with the present intellectual society role and discourse in static and arouse the community knowledge of traditional intellectual energy return. The train of thought of research of this paper is on the relationship between the intellectual's social role and the right of discourse important practical framework, the Dreyfus case background and by according to the occurrence and change of analysis of "intellectual" social roles, and with the intellectual discourse in the origin and resolution factor between relations. The in a comprehensive review of the conditions of intellectual concept, through comparing the process of existing in different historical times and different countries in different knowledge background on the issue of Dreyfus. Analysis of the written materials and video materials, trying to Dreyfus matters as a detailed social issues, analysis of the relationship between the intellectual social roles and discourse right, and the matters in intellectual groups of structural reasons. Specifically, through the process of discourse as a symbolic object and social action theory analysis remind it contains "soft violence on the intellectual community role occurrence and change of role, said in the Dreyfus Affair in is" I accuse "with the petition and other articles or Dreyfus group of discourse theory, courtroom Zola's testimony of the intellectual outside the role stratification and intellectual ligand roles in the society, and with class action. At the same time, effects of intellectual roles in the society of the right of discourse not only contains number and origin of the right of discourse in the Dreyfus Affair in in knowledge field and public domain of the intellectual social roles, also includes the influence of the relationship between discourse right and other rights of the system. Through the process of the relationship between the Dreyfus in matters of intellectual social roles and discourse right analysis and summary, the Dreyfus Affair in the intellectual role as a common member group of fantasy model aimed at driving on the current common member and the discourse right occur certain reference and enlightenment. 目录: |
