| 本文基于年夜范围语料库,以“V失落”格局为对象停止研究,由绪论、主体和结语三部门组成。绪论重要论述本文选题的意义、研究现状、研究目的及拟采取的实际、办法、语料等。第二章重要从语义的方面临“V失落”构造中的“失落”停止剖析,周全引见了“失落”的语义类型,指出“失落”作补语的多样性,剖析了意义分歧的“V失落”构造中“V”的语义特点,并对“失落”的语义分化作了较为具体的描述。第三章从用时角度对“V失落”停止剖析,描写了“失落”从实义动词到用在动词后作补语的进程。我们发明,“失落”最后用在动词后作补语是表现详细成果义即“去除性成果义”,后来才涌现“分开义”,“已然义”涌现得最晚。我们得出的结论是“V失落”中“失落”的演化走了如许一条途径“失落”的转义→去除义→分开义→已然义。我们以为这条途径中的“失落”逐步从实义动词走向虚化。第四章对“V失落”中“失落”的虚化动因停止剖析,重要从三个方面停止剖析第一是义项动因,即“失落”的原型性语义特点,从“失落”的原型性语义特点[/离开][/分开]动身,引申出了表“去除性成果义”的“失落”,然后又引伸出了表“分开义”和“已然义”的“失落”。第二是客观化,动词“失落”的产生有两个成果,直接成果是客体离开基体,即就客体而言,客体离开了其所依靠的基体,直接成果是基体有所减损。就人们的客观心思而言,“减损”给人的感到普通是欠好的、不如意的。是以和“失落”搭配的动词多是一些消极意义的动词。第三是认知动因,重要是转喻和隐喻的感化。最初我们测验考试对“失落”的虚化限制认知动因作出说明,指出“失落”之所以没有虚化为语法标志是因为“失落”的空间意象和举措性太强招致的。同时运用频率也是制约其虚化水平的一个主要缘由。我们以为,跟着“失落”运用频率的增长,还有进一步虚化的能够。最初是结语,归结归纳综合本文研究的内容。 Abstract: This paper based on a large-scale corpus, with "V" lost pattern as the object research, by the introduction, body and conclusion of three departments. The introduction discusses the important significance of this thesis, research status, research objective and actual, intends to take measures, such as corpus. In the second chapter, important from the aspects of semantic Pro during the construction of the "V" lost "lost" analysis, comprehensive introduction to the semantic types of "lost", pointed out that "lost" as a complement of biodiversity, the analysis in the structure "V lost" of the different meaning of "V" semantic features, and gave a detailed description of the Semantic Differentiation of "lost". The third chapter from time angle of "V lost" to carry on the analysis, the description of the "lost" from the true meaning of the verb to use in the process of complement after a verb. We invented, "lost" finally in complement after a verb is the performance results detailed meaning namely "removal of fruit of righteousness" later until the emergence of "righteousness" separately, already righteousness "emerge to the late. We come to the conclusion is "V" lost "lost" the evolution of go such a way of "lost" escape, removal of Yi, Yi Yi, already separately. We believe that the "loss" of this path gradually turns from the meaning of the verb to the. Chapter four of the "V" lost "lost" grammaticalization reason analysis, important from three aspects to carry on the analysis first is the motivation of meanings, namely "lost" prototype of semantic features, from the "lost" the prototype of semantic features [/ left] apart] start, extended surface "removal of fruit of righteousness", "lost", and lead out of the table "righteousness" and "already" lost "separate". The second is objective, and the verb "lost" has two results, the results directly is the object leaves the matrix, namely, on the object, object to leave the rely on the matrix, the results directly is matrix derogation. In terms of people's objective thinking, "from" to the people of ordinary feeling is not good, not good. Is to and "lost" collocation verbs are some of the negative meaning of the verb. Third is the cognitive motivation, and it is the influence of metonymy and metaphor. First we test on "lost" virtual limit cognitive motivation explains, pointed out that "lost" the reason why there is no empty as a grammatical marker is because "lost" image space and the action is too strong lead. At the same time, the frequency is one of the main reasons to restrict the level of virtual. We think, with the loss of the application frequency of growth, there is further virtual. The first is the conclusion, summed up the content of this article. 目录: |
