| 遭遇垄断守法行动损害的主体有权根据司法请求守法行动人承当平易近事义务，到达这一目标重要门路是平易近事诉讼。垄断守法行动损害的能够是私家好处，也能够是国度好处和社会公共好处，私家可以本身经由过程提起反垄断平易近事诉讼取得补偿，国度好处和社会公共好处的保护今朝重要经由过程反垄断机构的行政法学和私家提起公益诉讼。但反垄断机构法学时能够因内涵和内在身分作用履行力，同时反垄断机构行政法学目标重要在于预防、惩戒守法行动人而其实不在于修复伤害，私家提起反垄断公益诉讼也能够因其弱势和面对的艰苦而难见成效，由法定的机关代表国度提起反垄断平易近事诉讼以修复受损的国度好处和社会公共好处就显得异常需要。代表国度提起反垄断平易近事诉讼最合适的主体是审查机关和反垄断机构，其人力资本、信息控制、证据获得等方面具有其他主体难以比较的优势，法语毕业论文，使国度反垄断平易近事诉讼变得更加快捷高效，这更有益于保护国度好处和社会公共好处。在国度提起的反垄断平易近事诉讼中，举证义务的分派、查询拜访权的行使、诉讼费用的承当等都必需在司法中进一步明白，这是国度反垄断平易近事诉讼有用运转的基本。我国开国之初的司法中已经明白划定审查机关有提起平易近事诉讼的权力，但今朝司法中并未明白付与任何主体基于保护国度好处和社会公共好处的须要提起国度反垄断平易近事诉讼的权力，即便付与审查机关和反垄断机关提起国度反垄断平易近事诉讼的权力也依然面对着诉讼规模、举证、诉讼法式、专业才能等成绩。是以，法语论文题目，构建反垄断法国度诉讼轨制必需从明白司法根据、界定诉讼规模、付与查询拜访取证权、完美诉讼法式、树立专家证人轨制等方面着手。 Abstract: Encounter monopoly law actions that harm the subjects have the right to according to legal claim to the action of law-abiding people assume the plain near the civil obligation to reach this goal important opportunities is plain near the court. Monopoly law action damage to private benefits, can also be a national interest and the social public benefits, private can itself through filed antitrust plain near the litigation to obtain compensation, the protection of national interests and social public interests is current important through the process of anti-monopoly mechanism of administrative law and private filed public interest litigation. But the anti monopoly law to connotation and internal factors affecting executive force, and anti - monopoly agency administrative law important goal is prevention, disciplinary action of law-abiding people and in fact is not the wound repair, private filed antitrust litigation can also be due to the weak and face hard and microscopic results, by the legal authority on behalf of the state filed antitrust plain near the litigation to repair damage to the interests of the state and social public benefits is abnormal need. Country representative filed antitrust plain recent litigation the right subject is the authority for review and antitrust regulators, control the human capital, information and evidence obtained aspects with other subjects to compare advantage, make the country anti-monopoly plain near litigation becomes faster and more efficient, which is more beneficial to protect national interest and social public benefits. Filed in the national anti-monopoly plain near the court, allocation of burden of proof, query visit right exercise, litigation expenses bear etc. are essential in the administration of justice to further understand, this is the country anti-monopoly plain recent litigation to the effective operation of the basic. At the beginning of the founding of our country judicial has clearly defined authority for review filed a civil lawsuit power, but in the current judicial didn't understand entrusts any subject on the basis of protecting national interests and social public interests need to bring country anti-monopoly plain in civil procedure of power, that power entrusted by the authorities in charge of examination and antitrust authorities lift the country anti-monopoly plain recent litigation would still face a scale litigation, evidence, legal procedures, professional ability scores. To build the anti-monopoly France litigation rail system, it is necessary to understand judicial basis, defined scale litigation, entrusts with the investigation and evidence collection right, perfect litigation French, set up expert witness system started. 目录: 摘要 5-6 Abstract 6 第1章 绪论 8-12 1.1 选题背景及意义 8-10 1.2 文献综述 10-11 1.3 主要内容和探讨措施 11-12 第2章 反垄断法国家民事诉讼的价值略论与理论基础 12-18 2.1 反垄断法国家民事诉讼的价值略论 12-14 2.2 反垄断法国家民事诉讼的理论基础 14-18 2.2.1 反垄断法私人实施之不足 14-16 2.2.2 反垄断法行政执法之不足 16 2.2.3 反垄断法国家民事诉讼的理论基础 16-18 第3章 反垄断法国家民事诉讼制度的基本构成 18-26 3.1 反垄断法国家民事诉讼的主体 18-22 3.1.1 检察机关 18-20 3.1.2 反垄断机构 20-22 3.2 国家反垄断民事诉讼中的举证责任略论 22-23 3.3 国家反垄断民事诉讼中的诉讼费用承担 23-26 第4章 我国反垄断法国家民事诉讼制度之构建 26-37 4.1 我国反垄断法私人民事诉讼存在不可逾越的观念困难与技术困难 26-28 4.2 反垄断法国家民事诉讼的优越性 28-30 4.3 构建我国反垄断法国家民事诉讼制度的依据 30-31 4.4 构建我国反垄断法国家民事诉讼制度需要解决的难题 31-32 4.5 构建我国反垄断法国家民事诉讼制度的几点建议 32-36 4.6 国家反垄断民事诉讼与私人反垄断民事诉讼的冲突与协调 36-37 结论 37-39 参考文献 39-41 附录A 攻读学位期间所发表的学术论文目录 41-42 致谢 42 |
