| 本论文试图从弗洛伊德实际系统的内涵建构和办法论上不雅照其对文学创作的作用，考核该实际在系统建构时的预设动身点和内涵逻辑，并联合实际的时期和学术配景，商量其内涵抵触若何发生，其深层构造又是若何在后继者的实际和创作中被选择、采用和言说。本论文以弗洛伊德实际的两点自我抵触为研究中间。其一是本体论构造的悖论。在系统构架上，弗洛伊德实际力争构建一个自足的诠释体系，在内容上超出了感性思想传统，而在构造上因循了逻各斯中间主义的思惟系统：力比多作为精力运动的基本能量，成为类本体论构造的原点，是弗成撼动的先验概念；而爱欲天性与损坏天性、快活准绳与实际准绳、本我与超我等等对峙概念回生了柏拉图式的二元对峙。其二是有意识实际的悖论。弗洛伊德假定有意识是埋伏的构念，具有一套与认识体系分歧的原始语法，但在理论中，有意识必定经由过程认识而出现，并经由过程说话和精力剖析医师的诠释而反感化于认识。是以，现实上，有意识的语法曾经预设于精力剖析的实际框架中。这些抵触在弗洛伊德实际的后继者的写作中获得了传承。本文商量了实际的上述自我抵触作用下的两个主要实际派别，其对弗洛伊德主义的立场和立场看似截然对峙，但都继续了弗洛伊德实际内涵抵触的构造和逻辑。在本体论悖论的作用研究方面，本论文以现代法国女权主义的领武士物埃莱娜·西苏为例。西苏否决弗洛伊德实际的父权中间，请求以母性的力气与之相对抗，却落入了弗洛伊德主义实际构造的窠臼：女权主义的言说自发生之刻，法语论文题目，就不能不随同着权利的角斗，对现有次序的解构并不是真正超出性别对峙，而是将推翻作为一种必需要背负的神圣任务，如许的相对否认将走向另外一种不自在的二元对峙，招致其女权主义实际和书写之间，存在一种没法从外部加以折衷的抵触。女权主义对弗洛伊德学说的争议，从内容上是对弗洛伊德主义的反水，但在实际建构上却成为其忠诚的继续者，在精力剖析的模子中，将推翻同等于语词的调换或反义书写，而缺少从基本上推翻的力气。在有意识悖论对文学创作的作用方面，本论文以安德烈·布勒东为例。作为直接收弗洛伊德实际而发生的超实际主义派别的领武士物，布勒东请求反水传统、否认中间、颠覆逻辑，将写作的重心转移到真实确当下体验。然则，超实际主义者又将预设了一个先验的实际动身点，使反水自己不再是自在选择的成果，而是先在的需要前提。超实际主义者从弗洛伊德有意识实际中看到了精力自在的实际化能够，然则，当自在成为标签化的必定选择，自在自己便不复存在。二十世纪的汗青回荡着对传统的对抗、起义和推翻的声响，昔日对弗洛伊德实际的立场亦是褒贬各半。但是，鞭挞其心思学神话的破产其实不能扼杀这一实际对二十世纪思惟史的严重进献；而赞成其内容上的首创性和推翻性价值时，也值得留意，弗洛伊德实际对二十世纪文学及文论的作用更多表现在系统建构和办法论上。是以，本论文研究弗洛伊德实际的自我抵触与其作用下的文学创作，以资不雅照一种实际在继承关系中的流变，法语论文题目，一种话语系统得以在何种水平上被临摹、转写、变形、支离和推翻。 Abstract: This paper tries to construct the connotation of Freud practical system and measures on indecent according to its influence on literary creation, in the actual appraisal system construction when the default starting point and the connotation of logic, and combined with the actual period and the academic background, discuss the connotation of how the conflict occurs, the deep structure and how the successor the practice and creation is selected, and the speech. In this thesis, we take the two points of Freud's theory of self contradiction. One is the paradox of ontology construction. In the system architecture, the actual Freud and strive to build a self-sufficient interpretation system in the content beyond the perceptual thinking of the traditional, and in the structure of the old ideology logos centrism: libido as the basic energy energy movement, become the origin of category ontology structure, is not a priori concept of Eros and shake; nature and nature damage, happy and practical principles, principle of ID and superego and the concept of two yuan confrontation confrontation retrogradation of Platon type. The other is the paradox of consciousness. Freud assumes that consciousness is the structure of the ambush, with a set of differences with the understanding of the original syntax, but in theory, a conscious awareness of the process will appear, and through the process of talking and energy analysis of the doctor's interpretation and counter to understand. In reality, a conscious grammar has been set up in the practical framework of energy analysis. These conflicts get the heritage in Freud's successor practical writing. This article discussed the actual conflict of the above two major practical schools, the Freud doctrine and the position of the seemingly polar confrontation, but they continue to the actual content of the Freud's structure and logic. In the study of the impact of the paradox of ontology, this thesis takes the modern French feminist Elena Sisu as an example. West rejected Freud's actual paternity, request to maternal strength and confrontation, but in Freud's practical construction pattern: a feminist speech since the moment, can not with the rights of the arena, and the deconstruction of the existing order is not really beyond gender confrontation, but will overthrow as a must bear the sacred mission, such relative direction will deny another uncomfortable two yuan confrontation, causing its feminist and practical writing, there is a not to compromise the conflict from the outside. The dispute of Feminism on Freud's theory, from the content of Freud's defection, but in actual construction has become loyal to, in the energy analysis model, will overturn equal to word exchange or antisense writing, and the lack of effort from the overthrow of basically. In the aspect of the influence of the consciousness paradox on the literary creation, this thesis takes Andre Breton as an example. Freud brought the warrior as a direct and practical surrealism faction, Breton, denied the traditional intermediate, request anti subversion logic, writing the focus to the real current experience. However, surrealism and the preset a priori the actual starting point, so that his defection is no longer free choice of the results, but in the first premise. Over the actual situation, the ultra - realistic person has seen the actual energy of the actual situation of the energy, but when it becomes the inevitable choice of the label, it will not exist in itself. Twentieth Century history echoed the traditional confrontation, uprising and overthrow of Freud sound, the actual position of the former is also mixed in half. However, the psychology of the myth of the lash actually cannot kill the actual bankruptcy on twentieth Century with history of serious thought; in favor of the content of the initiative and the overthrow of value, are also worth attention, the influence of Freud on twentieth Century the actual literature and literary theory more now and methodology on system construction. In this paper, the actual self contradict with Freud under the influence of literary creation, in order to indecent according to an actual in succession rheological relationship, a discourse system is copying, level of transcription, deformation, fragmented and overturned. 目录: |
