从1804年法国民法典到1992年荷兰民法典一民法典体例及编纂模式的变化[法语论文]

资料分类免费法语论文 责任编辑:黄豆豆更新时间:2017-05-08
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
近代以来,跟着世界列国特别是年夜陆法系国度法典编辑活动的鼓起与睁开,人们对平易近法典的编辑赐与了极年夜的存眷。随同着列国在政治、经济和社会文明生涯方面接触的日趋频仍,各个国度司法的成长也就弗成防止地遭到他公法学成长的作用。是以,在如许的法律年夜配景下,我国制订本身的平易近法典也就必需普遍参酌列国平易近事立法的经历,考核年夜陆法系列国平易近法典的编辑编制及首编形式成为制订中公民法典的必定请求。本文从比拟司法史的角度,追根溯源对这方面加以研究并停止初步总结,法语毕业论文,以期对我公民法典的编辑有所裨益。全文约三万字,除引言和停止语外共由四章构成,各章重要内容以下第一章是对近代以来平易近法典编辑编制的汗青考核,共有三种形式罗马式、潘德克顿式和折衷式。在本章中,作者考核了三种编辑编制的寄义、由来及代表性的法典,法语论文范文,并在此基本上对其好坏停止扼要剖析。第二章是有关平易近法典首编形式的阐述。本章共分四节前三节分离对序编、总则和折衷式三种典范的法典首编形式停止剖析;第四节则对序编和总则的共通的地方加以归结总结,为阐述我公民法总则的弃取与否奠基基本。第三章具体阐述了序编和总则弃取的启事。本章共分四节第一节法公民法典序编之缘起;第二节德公民法总则编之启事;第三节日本对德公民法典总则的批评继受;第四节瑞士平易近法典之选择一弃总则而选序编之启事。这四节分离对法国、德国、日本、瑞士和荷兰平易近法典首编形式拔取的启事做了具体的阐述。第四章是对于我公民法典编辑编制及首编形式之划定。共分两节。第一节我公民法典编辑系统及首编形式;第二节我公民法典编制及首编形式设置之启事。活着界列国已有平易近法典经典编辑形式的基本上,联合我国独有的国情及学术传统对我国的平易近法典编辑编制及首编形式提出响应的建议。

Abstract:

In modern times, especially with the world and open up a civil law country code editing, the code editor of the people gave great attention. Along with the nations in the political, economic and social cultural life contact are becoming more and more frequent, the growth of each country judicial also Eph into prevent by him the growth of public legal effect. To under such law big background, our country develop itself plain near code is required generally refers to the nations plain recent legislative experience, assessment of Continental Law Series country plain near code editing system and the first series, form become developed in civil code must request. The from the comparative perspective of legal history, tracing the source in this area are discussed and a preliminary summary, has a benefit by the time to our civil code editor. The full text of about 30000 words, in addition to the introduction and conclusion is composed of four chapters constitute, the chapters following the first chapter is since the modern plain near the code editor compiled history examination, a total of three forms of Romanesque, Pan Deke meal and eclectic style. In this chapter, the author examines three kinds of editing the meaning, origin and representation of the code, and then basically on the quality of brief analysis. The second chapter is the first part of the civil code of the form. This chapter is divided into four before the third quarter separation analysis of sequencing, general and eclectic in three typical code first compiled form; the fourth quarter is common place of preface and general to be summarized, to illustrate the general principles of the civil law "trade-offs and no foundation. The third chapter describes the preface and general choice notice. This chapter is divided into four sections the first section civil law code sequence encoding the origin; section II of Germany civil code general provisions in the notice; the third section Japan of German civil code general criticism following; section four Swiss plain near code discards a general and programmed to notice. Elaborates the four day separation of France, Germany and Japan, Switzerland and the Holland civil code first arrange the form using. The fourth chapter is about the delimitation of civil code compiling and editing my first coding form. Is divided into two sections. The first section of my civil code editing system and the first part of the second I set the notice form; civil code compilation and first compiled form. The world has the classic form of the civil code editor basically, and combined with China's national conditions of academic tradition unique to our country civil code editing and puts forward the corresponding proposal preparation and form the first series.

目录:

摘要   4-5   引言   8-11       一、选题的缘起   8       二、探讨近况   8-9       三、本文的构想   9-10       四、探讨措施   10-11   第一章 对民法典编纂体例的历史考察   11-20       第一节 罗马式编纂模式   11-13       第二节 潘德克顿式   13-16       第三节 折中式   16-20   第二章 民法典首编之模式   20-27       第一节 序编   20-22       第二节 总则   22-24       第三节 折中式   24-25       第四节 序编和总则的共通之处   25-27   第三章 序编、总则之取舍缘由   27-34       第一节 法国民法典序编之缘起   27-29       第二节 德国民法总则编之缘由   29-30       第三节 日本对德国民法典总则的批判继受   30-31       第四节 瑞士民法典之选择——弃总则而选序编之缘由   31-34   第四章 我国民法典编纂体例及首编模式之规定   34-41       第一节 我国民法典编纂体例及首编模式   34-35       第二节 我国民法典体例及首编模式设置之缘由   35-41           一、百年历史选择   35-37           二、民商合一的需要   37-39           三、总则自身的特点所致   39           四、小结   39-41   结束语   41-43   参考书目   43-48   后记   48  

免费论文题目: