| 随同着汗青教导学的赓续成长，汗青比拟教导愈来愈遭到学界的存眷，而个中的中美汗青科比拟研究遭到学者普遍存眷。由于以美国为参照，我们不只可以感触感染中美两国在教导理念、教导措施上的分歧，法语毕业论文，还可以自创其先辈的教授教养办法、教材编写措施。曩昔学者更存眷对中美汗青教导中课程尺度、汗青教授教养办法、汗青课程设置的比拟，而很少触及两国汗青教材的比较。本文拟从个案研究动手，以中国的人教版高中汗青教材和美国的麦格劳—希尔版世界汗青这两部代表性的高中汗青教科书为研究对象，以活着界近代史上有严重的汗青意义并在两版教材中占领主要重量的“法国年夜反动”为研究内容，经由过程全方位的比拟，寻觅出中美两版教材编者在教科书编写中的各类差别，透视这些差别面前两国在教授教养目的、汗青不雅方面的分歧，法语论文题目，对我国教材的教材改良、成长提出看法。最初，根据这些建议从新编写人教版“法国年夜反动”这部门内容。本文分为引言、注释、参考文献三部门。注释分为四部门：第一部门是对中国人教版和美国麦格劳—希尔版世界汗青从教材编制、内容构造、课文体系、课文帮助体系、史料应用五个方面停止体系、周全的比拟。经由过程比拟，表现两国教导中的差别，并剖析我国在教材编写中的缺乏。第二部门以我国教材编写中的缺乏为根据，对我国教材编写的改良提出建议。第三部门是对人教版选修二第5单位中“法国年夜反动”部门停止从新编写。第四部门是结语，对全文停止总结。 Abstract: Along with the history teaching guidance of ceaseless development, historical analogy teaching has received more and more academic concern, and Sino American history, comparative study by scholars generally concern. As a reference to the United States, we can not only feel the differences between China and the United States in teaching ideas, teaching methods, but also can create their own teaching methods, teaching materials, teaching methods, teaching methods. The past scholars pay close attention to the teaching of Chinese and American history curriculum standard, the teaching methods of history, history curriculum, and rarely touched the comparison between the two countries history textbook. This paper intends to start from case study, to Chinese teaching high school history textbooks and the McGraw - Hill version of "world history" are the two representative of high school history textbooks as the research object, to live in the modern history of the world is the significant historical significance and in two editions of textbooks for collar. The weight is "the French Revolution" as the research content, through the process of a full range of match, seek out Sino US two editions textbook editors in the textbooks of different kinds, in front of the difference between the two in terms of teaching objectives, history perspective differences, the textbook improvement of textbooks in China, growth put forward their views. First, according to the recommendations from the newly written PEP "French Revolution" of the department. This thesis is divided into three departments: introduction, annotation and reference. Annotation is divided into four departments: first part is for the Chinese people to teach version and the McGraw - Hill version of "world history" from the compilation of teaching materials, content and structure, the text system and text help system, the use of historical materials in five aspects: system, comprehensive comparison. Through the comparison, the performance of the differences between the two countries, and the analysis of the lack of teaching materials in the preparation. The second section is based on the lack of textbooks in our country, and puts forward suggestions on the improvement of the compilation of textbooks in our country. The third sector is the fifth two units of the people's education version of the "French Revolution" department to stop the new preparation. The fourth part is the conclusion, which summarizes the whole paper. 目录: 中文摘要 4-5 英文摘要 5 引言 7-14 （一）选题缘由 7-8 （二）探讨综述 8-13 （三）选题意义 13-14 一、中国人教版和美国麦格劳—希尔版比较 14-46 （一）教材体例比较 14-15 （二）内容结构比较 15-17 （三）课文系统比较 17-25 （四）课文辅助系统比较 25-36 （五）史料应用比较 36-46 二、对我国教科书改进的启示 46-52 （一）完善教科书内容设计 46 （二）改善教科书语言叙述方式 46-47 （三）加大地图、图表的使用 47 （四）增加原始史料的运用 47-48 （五）提高教科书问题质量 48-49 （六）加大各种史观渗透 49 （七）增加对学生的学法指导 49-50 （八）培养学生的时间观念 50-52 三、“法国大革命”教材设计 52-68 （一）设计思路 52-53 （二）教材内容设计 53-68 结语 68-71 参考文献 71-74 后记 74 |
