| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，俄语论文网站，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 日本以朝鲜和中国为侵犯对象的年夜陆政策思惟由来已久,1890年山县有朋炮制出“主权线”和“好处线”实际,则标记着日本近代年夜陆政策的正式构成。明治维新后,日本开端把年夜陆政策实际积极付诸理论。日本起首兼并了琉球,占据了台湾,把中国权势赶出了朝鲜,然则却在接上去完整掌握朝鲜和向中国西南扩大的进程中,碰到了沙皇俄国的阻拦。19世纪80年月,以西伯利亚年夜铁路的建筑为标记,俄国的眼力转向远东,开端履行把中国西南和朝鲜作为重点指向的远东政策。因为都以朝鲜和中国西南为侵犯对象,日本年夜陆政策和俄国远东政策必定产生抵触,中日甲午战斗后的三国干预还辽事宜等于日俄抵触激化的表示。1897年中国产生了反帝爱国的义和团活动,俄国乘隙占据了中国东三省,并以撤军为前提,强迫中国出让西南利权。针对俄国的行为,日本不只积极请求俄国撤军,并且极力阻拦中国把西南利权出让给俄国,由于俄国终究没有如期从西南撤军,直接招致了日俄战斗的迸发。小村寿太郎是日俄战斗前后日本异常主要的交际人员,他从义和团活动时代开端,即亲密存眷俄国的行为,想法打破第二次《中俄密约》,死力阻拦俄国独有中国西南权益,并在促进俄国缔结撤军合同中施展了主要感化。小村最后试图停止日俄协商,实施“满韩交流”。熟悉到这一计划弗成行以后,积极促进了日英联盟以反抗俄国。为了完全处理“满韩成绩”,小村下定决计对俄一战,作为外务年夜臣主导了停战交际,起首缔结了日英联盟,为日本追求了靠得住盟友；然后在战前的日俄会谈中,力图尽快停止会谈,而且在会谈时代及会谈停止后,死力争夺列强支撑。 Abstract: Japan to North Korea and China for violations of the object of the mainland policy thinking has a long history. In 1890 in processing a sovereign line "and" good "practical, marking the official form of modern Japanese continent policy. After the Meiji Restoration, Japan began to put into practice the eve of the actual land policy theory. Chapeau Japan annexed the Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan accounted for, the Chinese power out of North Korea, however they will in pick up complete mastery of the north and southwest China to expand the process, met blocked in tsarist Russia. 80 years of the 19th century, to the eve of the Siberian railway construction marked, Russia's eye turned to the Far East, began implementing the southwest China and North Korea as the key point of the Far East policy. Because are to Korea and China Southwest for violation of the object, the Japanese mainland policy and the Russian Far East policy will inevitably produce conflict, the Sino Japanese war after the romance of the Three Kingdoms intervention also Liao matters is equal to the Russo Japanese conflict intensified said. 1897, China produced the anti imperialist patriotic Yihetuan activities, Russian Chengxi occupy the three provinces in Northeast China, and to withdraw as the premise, forcing China to sell the rights of the southwest. Actions against Russia, Japan not only actively request Russia to withdraw, and tried to stop the Chinese the southwest rights sold to Russia, because Russia after all there is no scheduled from southwest withdrawal directly lead to the burst of the Russo Japanese war. Komura zyutarou is before and after the Russo Japanese War, Japan the main abnormal communication personnel, he from the beginning of the Yihetuan Movement age is, intimate deposit to pay close attention to Russia's behavior, idea to break the second "the Sino Russian secret treaty", trying to block Russia exclusive rights and interests in the Southwest of China, and in the promotion of Russia concluded army to withdraw the contract to display the important role. The village finally tried to stop the Russo Japanese negotiations, the implementation of the "full Korea exchange". Be familiar with this plan after the trip, and actively promote the alliance in order to fight against russia. In order to fully address the "man Han achievement", village set decided to a war against Russia, as foreign minister leading the armistice communication chapeau concluded the Anglo Japanese Alliance, for the Japanese pursuit of the reliable allies; then in the prewar talks with Russia, trying to stop as soon as possible talks, and after the stop times talks and talks to compete for the support of the great powers. 目录: 摘要 2-3 Abstract 3 引言 5-8 一、两虎竞食,日俄战争背景--“大陆政策”与“远东政策”的冲突 8-14 (一) 日俄战争前日本的“大陆政策” 8-11 (二) 日俄战争前俄国的“远东政策” 11-14 二、明修栈道,暗度陈仓--小村寿太郎与俄国的外交渊源 14-25 (一) 小村寿太郎与义和团运动时期的俄国 14-18 1、在驻俄公使任上密切观察俄国动向 14-16 2、试图进行日俄协商 16-17 3、在北京谈判中抵制俄国意图 17-18 (二) 打破第二次中俄密约 18-21 1、密切探听中俄交涉内容及进展 18-20 2、不断向中国政府施加压力,阻止中国答应俄国签约要求 20 3、在俄国撤回第二次《中俄密约》中的影响 20-21 (三) 小村外交与《东三省交收条约》的缔结 21-25 1、继续向中国施压,并“指导”中国修改条约 22-23 2、直接与俄国交涉,向俄国明确表示日本的反对态度 23-24 3、阻止俄国专占“满洲”利权 24-25 三、未雨绸缪--小村寿太郎为日俄开战所做的准备 25-33 (一) 促成日英同盟对抗俄国 25-28 1、在日本政府内部说明日英同盟的重要性 26-27 2、不惧元老,推动日英同盟谈判 27-28 (二) 战争在即的小村外交 28-33 1、针对俄国不履行撤兵计划的应对 28-30 2、日俄战争开始前,小村与俄国的直接交涉 30-32 3、日俄战争开始前,小村争取列强支持的外交活动 32-33 结论 33-34 注释 34-39 参考文献 39-41 后记 41-42 |
