| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 普尔热瓦尔斯基是俄国有名的地舆学家和中亚考核家，他在1870—1885年间曾四次率队在中亚停止考核观光，并是以取得了丰富的地舆和人文研究结果，为俄国搜集了年夜量谍报。在观光停止以后，普尔热瓦尔斯基整顿出书了相干纪行著作，俄语论文范文，他的这些纪行著作对我们熟悉百余年前的地域天然生态和人文景不雅具有必定赞助，能在必定水平上弥补国际文献记录的缺乏，至今仍有必定的学术价值。然则，普尔热瓦尔斯基的纪行具有必定的殖平易近颜色，这方面也异样值得存眷。后殖平易近主义是20世纪70年月鼓起于东方学术界的一种具有激烈政治性和文明批评颜色的学术思潮。它以话语剖析的措施研究宗主国和前殖平易近地之间的关系和一切遭到帝国主义过程作用的文明。普尔热瓦尔斯基的纪行所具有的殖平易近颜色使其本身成为后殖平易近主义存眷和研究的对象。普尔热瓦尔斯基的论述以欧洲文明为中间，仰望亚洲文明，用归化、二元对峙和总括性的论述措施打造了奸巧、狡诈、勇敢、贪财的亚洲人抽象和破败、落伍、腐败、期待救赎的亚洲抽象，胜利借助“他者”经由过程西方主义话语完成了自我的定位，将欧洲与亚洲打形成对峙面。然则，他的二元对峙的论述措施、他在纪行中打造的西高东低式的伟大差别和他有意疏忽中国文明的做轨则反应出他的欧洲中间主义心态；除此以外，普尔热瓦尔斯基还以他在纪行中打造的西高东低式的伟大差别为来由提出文明托管的殖平易近建议，如许，他的殖平易近思惟在他的欧洲中间主义心态和文明托管思惟中获得了最好表现。普尔热瓦尔斯基的殖平易近思惟是在19世纪70年月的欧洲列强对我国东南部地域的凯觎、沙俄的扩大传统、亚历山年夜二世积极的对外扩大政策、欧洲探险者的殖平易近情感和普尔热瓦尔斯基特别的身份等身分的综协影响下发生的，俄语论文，他的这类殖平易近思惟对俄国社会具有必定的作用力。 Abstract: Nikolai przhevalsky is Russia famous geographer and Central Asia Home appraisal, he in 1870 - 1885 had four times led the team in Central Asia to stop the assessment of tourism and is to achieve the rich geography and humanities research results, for the Russian collected a large number of espionage. After the stop sightseeing, Nikolai przhevalsky rectification Book Coherent j-men work. These travel diary of his works to our familiar with over a hundred years ago the regional natural ecology and humanities landscape indecent with must be sponsored, in a certain level make up for the lack of international literature records, still have certain academic value. However, the travels of Prejevalsky has a colonial color, this is also worthy of attention. After colonizing doctrine is the 20th century, 70 years drum originated from Western academics a has intense political and cultural criticism of the academic trend of thought of color. The relationship between the discourse analysis approach to study the suzerain and former colonial near earth and was all imperialist influence of civilization. Nikolai przhevalsky travel diary of colonizing color make itself become a colonial nearly "save the object of attention and research. Nikolai przhevalsky exposition to European civilization as intermediate, looking at the Asian civilizations, domestication, binary confrontation and sum up this method create savvy and cunning, brave, greedy Asians abstraction and dilapidated, behind, corruption, looking for redemption of Asian abstract, victory by "other" by western discourse completion of the self positioning, to Europe and Asia into confrontation. However, his binary confrontation discusses methods, he in the travel diary to build the East West High low type great difference and he intends to neglect the Chinese civilization rail is a reaction of the mentality of his European centrist. In addition, Poole Gevalls also to he in the travel diary to build the East West High low type great difference for the reason put forward civilization is hosted by the colonial past recommendations, such, near his colonial thoughts in his European centrist mentality and hosting of civilization thought won the best performance. Nikolai przhevalsky colonial nearly thought is 70 years in the 19th century the European powers of area of Ministry of our country southeast Kay scouts, tsarist Russia expand traditional, Alexander II positive foreign policy of expanding, European explorers of the colonial nearly emotion and Prejevalsky Te other identity identity fully CO under the action of, his this kind of Colonial nearly thought on Russian society has certain influence. 目录: 摘要 6 俄文摘要 7-9 目录 9-11 正文 11-82 参考文献 82-86 附录 86-87 |
