现代化变革中的国家表现[俄语论文]

资料分类免费俄语论文 责任编辑:阿米更新时间:2017-05-19
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
摘要:(摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制,下载原文正常,内容请直接查看目录。)

古代化是一个连续的社会变更进程,而经由过程施展国度的主导感化来推动古代化过程则是年夜多半后发国度的必定选择。本论文研究的是晚清的国度政权在19世纪60年月开端的古代化变更中所施展的感化。经由过程对近代英国、法国和德国古代化变更进程中国度所施展的感化停止剖析,得出国度施展感化的三种措施,然后以德国古代化变更中国度所施展的感化为例,剖析晚清古代化变更中的国度是若何施展感化的,从国度表示方面说明为何晚清的古代化变更终究掉败了。本论文起首界定了本论文的焦点概念:国度、权要、社会,然后经由过程对近代英、法、德西欧三国的古代化进程中国度所施展的感化停止了剖析,俄语论文,由此得出国度施展感化的三种形式:消极国度、互动国度与主导国度。最初,指出主导国度形式根本上为后发国度古代化变更所采取的形式,这一形式也是本论文研究的重点。在完成实际模子推导以后,本论文就晚清的古代化进程中国度施展其感化的措施停止商量。经由过程对中心政权的掌握力、权要团体的退步和变更推进者本身的缺乏这三方面的研究来剖析晚清的国度政权是若何推进古代化变更的。经由过程研究得出晚清的中心政权对社会和处所政权的掌握力是赓续地被减弱、权要团体和处所精英也产生激烈退步而削减了对国度的支撑和忠实、和变更的推进者自己就缺少古代认识和引导全体变更的本质这三方面结论,俄语论文网站,并以此以为晚清的国度政权基本有力推进社会停止连续的全体变更。最初,经由过程回想了德国形式,并扼要研究了与晚清同时期采取德国形式并异样获得异常结果的日本和俄国的国度政权是若何推进古代化变更的,然后比较研究说明晚清的国度政权为何没能如德国、日本和俄国那样有用履行古代化变更,并以为权要团体的落伍和局限是晚清国度主导的古代化变更掉败的基本缘由。

Abstract:

Ancient times is a continuous process of social change, and through the process of the country's leading role to promote the ancient process is the most likely after the country's inevitable choice. This thesis is to study the influence of the state power in the late Qing Dynasty in the ancient change of the beginning of the 60 month of nineteenth Century. Through the process of the role of modern Britain, France and Germany ancient of change in the process of cast analysis that country play a role of the three methods, and then to Germany ancient change China cast role, for example, analysis of the nation in the late Qing Dynasty ancient change is how to play a role of, from the country said explains why in the late Qing Dynasty of ancient change eventually fail. This paper defines the concept of focus: country, to the right, social and through the process of modern Britain, France, Germany and Western Europe country modernization of a Chinese cast effect analysis. So we can conclude that the country play a role of three forms: negative country, interactive state and the leading countries. At first, it is also the key point of this paper to point out the form of the dominant state in the form of the later development. After the completion of the actual model is derived, this paper on the late Qing Dynasty in the process of China's modernization of the way to play its role to discuss. Through the process of the central political power, the right to the decline of the group and the change of the promotion of the lack of these three aspects of the study to analyze the state power in the late Qing Dynasty is how to promote the change of the ancient. Through the research that in the late Qing Dynasty central political power of society and local government control is gengxu be weakened, the right to groups and local elites also produced intense regress and cut the country's support and faithful, and change to promote their lack of ancient knowledge and guide and change the nature of the conclusions, and this thought in late Qing Dynasty of the state power of the basic powerful promote the society to stop all continuous change. Initially, through the process of recall the German form, and made a brief discussion of the late Qing Dynasty and the same period take Germany and strange anomaly results of Japan and Russia country regime is how to promote the change of ancient, and comparative study shows that during the late Qing Dynasty, the country's regime why didn't such as Germany, Japan and Russia as useful to fulfil modern change, and that the right to group the backwardness and limitations is leading nation in the late Qing Dynasty ancient change fail basic reason.

目录:

封面   1-2  
文摘   2-3  
英文文摘   3-4  
声明   4-5  
第一章导论   5-13  
    一、论文探讨问题综述   5-8  
        1、探讨目标   5-6  
        2、探讨意义   6-8  
        3、探讨措施   8-8  
    二、现有主要探讨回顾   8-13  
        1、近代中国变革的总体性探讨作品   8-10  
        2、近代中国社会各方面的具体探讨作品   10-13  
第二章概念界定和理论模型推导   13-21  
    一、主要概念界定   13-17  
        1、核心概念:国家、社会、官僚   13-17  
        2、社会变革中的国家   17-17  
    二、理论模型推导:社会变革中的国家发挥影响模式   17-21  
        1、西欧三国的历程   17-20  
        2、理论模型推导:国家在社会变革中的影响   20-21  
第三章晚清变革中的国家表现   21-39  
    一、中央控制力的衰弱   21-27  
        1、中央财政的破产   21-23  
        2、对社会控制力的下降   23-25  
        3、地方的壮大与失控   25-27  
    二、官僚集团的腐朽和内耗   27-33  
        1、官僚集团的腐朽和乡村领袖的退化   28-30  
        2、冲突与内耗   30-32  
        3、废除科举的作用   32-33  
    三、不成熟的变革者   33-39  
        1、洋务派的变与不变   34-36  
        2、犯幼稚病的维新派   36-39  
第四章回顾与反思   39-50  
    一、主导国家模式回顾:德国与日俄   39-42  
        1、德国现代化变革中的国家表现   39-41  
        2、德国模式的扩展:日本和俄国   41-42  
    二、晚清变革失败的原因   42-50  
        1、欠规划的国家主导   42-47  
        2、根本原因:落后的官僚集团   47-50  
参考文献   50-52  
后记   52  

免费论文题目: