海权对抗陆权一理论、历史与现实的解读[俄语论文]

资料分类免费俄语论文 责任编辑:阿米更新时间:2017-05-19
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
摘要:(摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制,下载原文正常,内容请直接查看目录。)

海权反抗陆权”是地缘政治学中最有作用力的世界不雅之一,这类世界不雅以为海权和陆权是一对天敌,它们之间的反抗是一种汗青地舆纪律,是贯串于世界汗青的最耐久的主题。马汉的“海权论”和麦金德的“陆权论”配合组成了“海权反抗陆权”的实际基本,其他地缘政治学者也从分歧方面分离阐述或丰硕了该实际。本文试图用这类世界不雅来不雅察息争释几个世纪以来年夜国在欧亚年夜陆的争取和反抗,并以不雅察到的现实来论证海权和陆权的反抗不只产生在曩昔,如今也还在延续,它们的涌现本源于地舆身分而非人文身分,是以,任何政治变更都没法转变这一现实。19世纪的国际关系史由英国和俄国的剧烈对立组成,它们的对内行为都遭到了地缘身分的作用。英国海权掌握着欧亚年夜陆的边沿地带,而占领了心脏地带的俄国则试图在边沿地带上追求出海口,由此招致两国在黑海海峡、中亚和中国西南的年夜比赛。20世纪,俄语论文,美国代替了传统的英国海上位置,苏联也由于在二战中的成功成为世界上最年夜的陆权国度。暗斗时代,俄语论文范文,它们一个从心脏地带向边沿地带扩大,一个从边沿地带向心脏地带停止遏制、包抄,在欧亚年夜陆边沿地带的三条阵线上睁开了近半个世纪的地缘比赛。跟着东欧剧变,苏联崩溃,暗斗以心脏地带的掉败而了结,但汗青的地舆纪律仍在延续。两洋计谋代表了美国在暗斗后应对新的地缘政治实际,追求全球霸权的思绪。它的焦点内容是占领两洋(年夜西洋和宁靖洋),掌握两洲(欧洲和亚洲),依托两约(北约和美日联盟)、遏制两国(俄罗斯和中国)、摄取两权(海权和陆权),并终究包抄心脏地带。中国事海陆兼备型的国度,位处欧亚年夜海洋缘计谋区域与宁靖洋地缘计谋区域交汇的边沿地带,夹在美国和俄罗斯两年夜权势规模以内。是以,将来中国的地缘计谋选择应保持海陆统筹的地缘计谋准绳,积极郑重处置年夜国关系并妥当处置台湾成绩。

Abstract:

"Sea power against land" is one of the geopolitical most influential in the world, this kind of indecent thought of land power and sea power is a pair of natural enemies, the resistance between them is a kind of historical geography discipline, is perforative in the history of the world's most enduring theme. Mahan's sea power theory and Mackinder's "land power theory" with the composition of the "sea power against the land rights of the actual basic, other geopolitical scholars also from different aspects of separation on or enrich the practical. This paper attempts to with the world to not Yacha information war release centuries of big country in the Eurasian continent to fight and resistance, and to observations to the reality to demonstrate against land power and sea power not only produced in the past, now still continue, emergence of origin of their geographical identity rather than cultural identity, to any political change can't change this reality. In nineteenth Century, the history of international relations was formed by the violent opposition between Britain and Russia, and their internal behavior was influenced by geographical factors. British sea power holds the edge of the Eurasian continent. While occupying the heart of Russia is trying to edge region in the pursuit of a sea, thereby incurred between the two countries in the Black Sea Straits, Central Asia and southwest China's big game. In twentieth Century, the United States instead of the traditional British position, the Soviet Union also because of the success of World War II in the world's largest land rights. Infighting era, them one from the heart to the edge of the area to expand, a from the edge of the area to the heart stop containment, outflanking, in the Eurasian continent at the periphery of the three fronts opened nearly half a century of geopolitical game. Along with the drastic changes in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, with heart failure infighting ended, but the history of geography discipline continues. Two ocean strategy represented the United States in the post cold war with the new geopolitical realities, the pursuit of global hegemony thoughts. Focus of the content of it is occupied two oceans (Atlantic and Pacific), master the two continents (Europe and Asia), based on about two (NATO and the US Japan alliance), contain two countries (Russia and China), uptake of two rights (sea power and land power), and eventually to outflank the heart. The kingdom of China both sea and land type, located at the intersection of Eurasian Nianye ocean margin strategy of regional and Pacific geo strategic region at the periphery of that folder within the United States and Russia two of the eve of the power scale. To future China's geopolitical strategy choice should maintain the sea land coordination of geo strategic principle, positive solemnly disposal of big country relations and properly handle the Taiwan issue.

目录:

免费论文题目: