摘要 4-6 Abstract 6-7 Chapter 1 Introduction 11-37 1.1 Background and purpose of the study 11-13 1.2 Development of seismic hazard assessment in China 13-25 1.2.1 Basic input data 13 1.2.2 Two large-scale collections of historical records 13-14 1.2.3 Chinese historical earthquake catalogues 14-16 1.2.4 Seismic Intensity Zonation 16-19 1.2.5 Seismic zoning maps 19-25 1.3 Development of SHA in USSR and Russia 25-37 1.3.1 Basic input data 29-31 1.3.2 Methods and techniques 31-32 1.3.3 Earthquake hazard parameters and maps 32-37 Chapter 2 Seismic hazard assessment in China 37-67 2.1 Determination of the potential source area 37-38 2.1.1 The meaning and types of the potential source area 37-38 2.2 Principles and procedures of determining of the potential source area 38-41 2.2.1 The principles and methods to determine the potential source area 38-39 2.2.2 Steps to determine the potential source area 39-41 2.3 Determination of direction and limits of potential source area 41-44 2.3.1 The direction of potential source area 42 2.3.2 Potential source area sizes 42-44 2.4 Seismicity parameters 44-58 2.4.1 Upper limit magnitude of seismic zone 45-48 2.4.2 The magnitude-frequency relation b value 48-52 2.4.3 Earthquake annual mean rate 52-57 2.4.4 Weighting factor 57-58 2.5 Seismic intensity attenuation relations 58-59 2.5.1 Data 58 2.5.2 Intensity attenuation model and analyzing method 58-59 2.6 Calculation of seismic hazard 59-67 2.6.1 Calculation of the seismic hazard at a ground point given an earthquake occur in jthpotential source area with magnitude 59-63 2.6.2 Field point total cumulative seismic hazard 63-67 Chapter 3 Seismic hazard assessment in Russia 67-114 3.1 Seismic hazard calculation 67-72 3.1.1 Technique of calculation of seismic hazard 67-70 3.1.2 Seismic hazard computation and zoning 70-72 3.2 LDF model of seismic sources 72-81 3.2.1 Focal Zones of Earthquakes Modeled in Terms of the Lattice Regularization 72-73 3.2.2 Ordering of Seismically Active Structures 73-76 3.2.3 Fractal Lattice Model of Seismogenesis 76-81 3.3 Lineament-Domain-Focal model of source zones 81-102 3.3.1 Seismicity parameters of source zones 83-102 3.4 Strong ground motion relations - relationship between the intensity with a magnitude and distance 102-105 3.5 The minuteness of the map, the settlement period T and the accuracy of the calculations 105 3.6 Model catalog 105-106 3.7 The intensity of the shock 106-107 3.8 Seismic zoning map of the next generation GSZ-2017 107-114 3.8.1 Clarification of the regions’ seismic regime 107-109 3.8.2 Expansion of probabilistic seismic hazard assessments 109 3.8.3 Development in map compilation for GSZ-2017 109-114 Chapter 4 Comparison between the methodologies of seismicity parameters estimation in China and Russia 114-122 4.1 Estimation of potential source area 114-116 4.2 Estimation of seismicity parameters 116-120 4.2.1 Estimation of seismicity parameters for the province 116-117 4.2.2 Estimation of seismicity parameters of PSA 117-120 4.3 Calculation of seismic hazard 120 4.4 Attenuation relations 120-122 Chapter 5 Comparison of seismic hazard assessment in case of boundary area (Heilongjiang river region) 122-150 5.1 Tan-Lu fault 122-123 5.2 Study on Tan-Lu fault in China 123-136 5.2.1 Location of Tan-Lu fault zone 123-124 5.2.2 Geological setting 124-133 5.2.3 Kinematics of the YYF 133-134 5.2.4 Yilan-Yitong fault on the fifth generation map 134-135 5.2.5 Conclusion 135-136 5.3 Study on Tan-Lu fault in Russia 136-147 5.3.1 Location of Tan-Lu-Okhotsk rift system 136-137 5.3.2 Tectonic position and main geological features 137-139 5.3.3 Features of the deep structure and seismicity 139-144 5.3.4 Fault tectonics of the basins of the Northern branch of the Tan-Lu-Okhotsk rift system 144-146 5.3.5 Conclusion 146-147 5.4 Comparison study 147-150 5.4.1 Methods of investigation 147-148 5.4.2 Result of investigation on Tan-Lu fault seismic hazard for both countries 148-149 5.4.3 Conclusion 149-150 Chapter 6 Conclusion 150-152 References 152-161 Acknowledgment 161 |
