The transition to a market economy is a major trend in today's world economy. Since 80 years, from the traditional planning economy to the market economy transition constitutes the two different ways, that is, the gradual transformation of the way and the transformation of the conservative approach. Gradual improvement is 80 years, China in the economic system reform gradually formed the economic transformation method; conservative transformation, also known as "shock therapy", it is upheaval in the late 1980s, Russia and Eastern European countries to stop the economic and political transformation of the basic method. 20 years of reform and opening up, China to stop the effective institutional innovation, the eye on global attainments; forms bright contrast with this is Russian for eight consecutive years of transformation, public cause serious effect, the save a sharp recession, fall into a serious crisis. To examine the reality in the Russian transition to the market economy is a failure. China's reform obtained apparent effect, but at the same time, we put difficulties of reform, especially state-owned enterprises achievements accumulated, these achievements has become complete rail system innovation and establish socialist market economic system, the physical obstruction. To transform Russia although the consequences of the Qianan, but the transformation of the former Russia and China's economic system style how similar to the side, and Russia today strange is a block from planning economic system to market economic system change of experimental field. Therefore, created the experiences of Russian economic system reform, summarize to transform China's victory and off by accident, after a period of time to transform China's future speculation has important historical significance and practical significance. In view of this, the author chose the Sino Russian economic system transformation of the comparative study of this topic. And from two aspects of history and practice, using detailed data demonstrates the Sino Russian why to stop the economic system reform, and two kinds of different ways to improve the history inevitability proposed further maintain the practicality of institutional innovation. This paper is divided into four sections: the first section: analysis of the Sino Russian economic system transformation of the initial premise, and to remind the differences between the two countries to choose the path of logical necessity. The transformation of the former, China and Russia were implemented heavy industry give priority to the development of the planned economy system, and is regulated by the old production systems are very serious. But Russia planning economic system reached the height of the centralization and the same sex, and Russia and China to compare and its special nature, it is a the same planning, hierarchical management planning system, planning is absolute relaxation, and planning economic situation under the hide a large number of consciously evacuation, no organized movement. Therefore, China planning degree of economic growth and effectiveness are far less than Russia. However, the lack of planning and development is precisely the advantages of market development, therefore, once the Chinese authorities pay close attention to the control, the market economy will flourish. Politically, China dial chaos anyway will work center of gravity transferred to prop up the economy down, and put forward the policy of reform and opening up; 70 years communication policy change initiated a new situation of communication issues in China, since then, opened the big door leading to the world economy. The former Soviet Union from the 1950s onwards began to traditional systems transformation. As a result, because actual rigid guidance, policy when out of the, and GE's "humanity, plain near the main socialist transformation, eventually lead to the collapse of the Soviet Union. For Russia is a lopsided economic situation, economic structure improvement, the complex social political legacy in a disastrous state. In the world, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the world political pattern in the pendulum has swung and, "war and growth" become the world's theme, Russia directly face in order to compete economically bound for the dominant internal competition; Council of mutual economic collapse, Russia lost a solid business partner, adhere to the "one-sided" policy. At the same time, the world scientific and technological revolution and the economic reform tide so that the Sino Russian feel backward pressure. In addition, the special historical and cultural traditions of China and Russia are affecting the growth of the two countries' economic and political. So, the transformation of the economic system for the two countries have no choice. The second sector: analysis of the two types of economic transition in China and russia. Two. On the purpose and process of the two kinds of transformation. China from the beginning of the transformation of planning economy to market regulation, supplemented by "gengxu be fruitful and grow, eventually it evolved as a clear purpose of the transformation, that is, to establish" socialist market economy "; and Russia 1991 suiwei by the collapse of the Soviet Union took power independently, immediately understand proposed to establish a capitalist free market economy. Although China and Russia are market-oriented orientation, but the two countries have a basic difference in the market economy, the purpose of the market economy. Reason we keep attention to transformation of the purpose of setting method and the aim to lure compare is due to such modifications to the lure of method will serve as a "transformation of the French" set resolution in the future transformation of the logical process that China from the part of the transformation to all supporting gradual transformation process with Russia "package" global transformation of conservative transformation process. Two. Everything has its cause, the gradual transformation and conservative transformation from the actual basic and value differences. The author thinks that China's gradual transformation is based on the fact that Marx's economic theory and new system economics are the actual basic system changes. 目录: |
