| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 由于认识形状的类似性、文明政策的作用和文明上亲密的交换关系，中国现代文学自从发生之日起，便与苏联文学结下了不解之缘，军事文学也异样不破例。然则20世纪90年月前后，从新掀开两国的军事文学文本，却发明出现出如斯年夜的分歧。本文拔取了中国作家都梁的《亮剑》和俄罗斯侨平易近作家弗拉基莫夫的《将军和他的军队》两个文本为个案，以剖析详细文本为主，找出其分歧的地方，俄语毕业论文，并剖析其缘由地点。本文从四方面睁开阐述起首是建构汗青的措施上，《亮剑》和《将军和他的军队》分离出现出“包涵”和“推翻”的形式；第二是在人物抽象的拓展上，前者更多采取内部言行塑造了李云龙这个抽象，使其以常人的措施高唱一曲豪杰之歌；尔后者显著更擅长从心思切入，描绘出一个愁闷的思虑者抽象；第三是两个文本的文本作风也显著分歧，分离出现出狂欢和声张、沉寂与凄凉的特色；最初是二者战斗艺术的分歧，前者着重在敌我抵触中彰显高尚的审美特点，尔后者着重在人物本身抵触中凸显喜剧的审美特点。本文在小结中对于两个文本发生分歧的缘由停止探源剖析。笔者以为其分歧本源有以下几个方面作家身份和立场的分歧，社会转型措施和成果的分歧，所秉持的文学传统的分歧。 Abstract: Due to recognize shapes, policy of civilization and civilized intimate exchange relationship, modern Chinese literature since the day, with the Soviet Union Literature indissoluble bond, military literature is likewise no exception. But in twentieth Century 90 years before and after, from the new opening of the military literature text, but the invention of such a big difference. This paper selects the two versions of Chinese writers Duliang "bright sword" and Russian overseas Chinese plain near writer vladimov the general and his forces "as a case, to analyze with text, find out the differences, and analyze the reason. This article from the four aspects of this is the first method in the construction of history, "sword" and "separation of the general and his army" appears "inclusion" and "overthrow" form; second figures in the abstract development, the former more internal shape Li Yunlong words and deeds to the abstract, in the ordinary method of singing a hero of the song; the latter was significantly better at starting from the mind, paints a gloomy abstract thinking; third is the two text style has significant differences, showing separation and quiet, silent and desolate Carnival features; first is the two battle artistic differences, the former focuses on the conflict between ourselves and the enemy to highlight the aesthetic characteristics of the noble, the latter mainly to highlight the aesthetic feature of comedy characters in itself in conflict. This article in the summary of the reason about the two stop of the divergence of text analysis. The author thinks that the differences of the identity and position of the writers have the following several aspects, the differences of the social transformation methods and achievements, and the differences of the literary tradition. 目录: 论文摘要 7-8 ABSTRACT 8 引言 9-15 第一章 两个文本建构历史的方式 15-23 第一节 《亮剑》:调和下的历史叙事 15-19 第二节 《将军和他的部队》:在反思中重构历史 19-23 第二章:两个文本中人物形象的塑造 23-31 第一节 李云龙:高唱一曲凡人的英雄之歌 24-27 第二节 科布里索夫:忧郁的思考者 27-31 第三章:两个文本叙事表达的风格 31-38 第一节 《亮剑》:带浪漫色彩的狂欢与张扬 31-34 第二节 《将军和他的部队》:带主观色彩的沉静与悲凉 34-38 第四章:两个文本中战争艺术的构建方式 38-43 第一节 《亮剑》:在敌我冲突中彰显崇高的审美特征 38-41 第二节 《将军和他的部队》:在自身冲突中凸显悲剧的审美特征 41-43 小结 43-47 结语 47-48 参考文献 48-50 后记 50 |
