［9］Kim Y, Worrell E. International Comparison of CO2 Emission Trends in theIron and Steel Industry［J］. Energy Policy, 2017, 30: 827～838. ［10］廖隆国,陆岩,马续香. 国外主要产钢国钢铁产业政策［J］. 冶金管理, 2017, (9): 4～18.［Liao Longguo, Lu Yan, Ma Xuxiang. The Iron and Steel Industry Policy in Foreign Major Steelmaking Countries［J］. Metallurgical Management, 2017, (9): 4～18.］ // A Comparison of Energy Intensity of the Iron and Steel Industry Between China, Japan and South Korea/ DOU Bin (School of Management of South/central University for Nationalities,Wuhan Hubei430074, China) Abstract There is an obvious gap about the energy intensity of China's iron and steel with the world's advanced level. This paper compares energy intensity and specific energy consumption of China, Japan, South Korea, and uses a decomposition analysis to calculate the affects on three countries' specific energy consumption of the changes of products and technology structure and energy efficiency from 1996 to 2017. At last,the paper compared every country's energy inte nsity with specific energy consumption, and analyzed the result. The study conclusion showed that products and technology structure and energy efficiency are the root causes for iron and steel energy intensity. In the process of adjusting product and technology structural and improving energy efficiency, we must not only focus on the reduction of energy consumption, but also pay attention to the improvement of the economy. Key words energy intensity; economic energy intensity indicator s; special energy consumption indicator; process and products mix; efficiency |
