作 者：关冰冰[1] 杨炳菁[2] GUAN Bingbing ,YANG Bingjing （1. School of Asian Languages and Cultures, Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou 310012, China; 2. Japanese Department, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China） 机构地区：[1]浙江外国语大学东方语言文化大学,浙江杭州310012 [2]北京外国语学院日语专业,北京100089 出 处：《浙江外国语大学学报》2017年第1期93-100,共8页Journal of ZHEJIANG Education Institute 摘 要：在日本近现代文学史中,历史小说作为小说的一类时常被提及,但时至今日,有关其本质的问题尚未被清晰界定,而这也是《苍狼》论争产生的根本原因。新历史主义产生重大作用后,历史被重新认知,这为重新看待《苍狼》论争以及界定历史小说的本质提供了崭新的视角。Historical novel is often mentioned in modem Japanese literary history. However, the nature of historical novel has not been defined clearly so far, which is the primary cause of the debate on The Blue Wolf. As new historicism begins to play an important role, people have new understandings on the definition of history. It provides a fresh perspective for us to judge the debate on The Blue Wolf and the definition of historical novel. 关 键 词：历史 历史小说 《苍狼》论争 分 类 号：I313.45[文学—其他各国文学] ，日语论文，日语论文 |
