| 世界上存在着5000多种说话，也就是说有年夜约5000种分歧的说话体系。须要思虑的是对于两个没有血缘关系、没有汗青纠葛的说话X和Y之间能否会存在配合点。现实上，各个说话固然在外面上看来分歧，然则现实上人类各说话之间存在着个性，这就是说话类型学的实际基本。发明说话景象变异的纪律，指出这类变异的限制，这恰是研究说话类型、说话个性的学者所关怀的成绩。说话类型学被看做为一个用时的研究对象，它不只研究现存的说话，也研究现代说话。毫无疑问，说话类型学也停止共时研究。这一切都使得它可以剖析、说明说话的演化、个性和变异的限制。别的，类型学是针对“人类一切说话”的。它更接近通俗说话学，它的目的是经由过程各类说话来研究说话运转的纪律。经由过程说话类型学，我们可以把汉语和法语放在一个更加普通、更加普遍的研究框架中审阅。本文的主题，一方面是研究汉语和法语之间的配合点，另外一个方面是研究二者的变异，法语论文，特殊是要在外面上的变异中找出变异的纪律和限制。我们起首不雅察两种说话的说话景象，然后树立两种说话的个性和分歧，然后再测验考试停止功效上的说明。固然，这一切都是在说话类型学的视角之下。本文的目标是比拟汉语和法语的说话体系，为说话教授教养、说话之间的翻译等任务供给一些实际基本。固然，说话类型学研究的重要是分歧说话之间的个性和变异，然则研究的角度却有许多。Robin已经将其总结为：语音类型和音位类型、语法类型、语义类型。现实上还应当有语篇类型等。然则，本文没能把一切的内容都包括出来，只选择个中的一个范畴对汉语和法语停止类型学视角下的比较研究。语法类型是类型学研究的焦点部门，包括了许多研究内容。本论文的研究就重要在语法类型的规模内睁开。第一章扼要描写说话类型学的成长汗青，引见说话类型学研究中的一个最主要的研究办法：树立包含关系。第二章经由过程汉语和法语的语法景象剖析两个最根本的理据：象似性和经济性。第三章在分歧的条理上研究词缀和形状屈折。别的，还要回想传统类型学的形状分类，在此基本上，丈量融会度和综合度。第四章经由过程三个最重要的句法成份—主语、动词、宾语，研究了小句的语序。评论辩论汉语和法语的根本语序，同时也对话题句构造做出剖析。第五章研究汉语和法语短语层面的语序。重要为三种短语的语序：名词短语、介词短语、动词短语。名词短语包含一个名词焦点和各类润饰语（指别词、描述词等）。动词短语包含一个动词焦点和各类状语（副词等）。介词短语包含介词焦点和名词。本文重要剖析这三种短语在汉语和法语中的个性，法语毕业论文，这恰是说话类型学所存眷的。现实上，对汉语和法语停止比较是较为艰苦的，一向以来都没有甚么太好的实际办法，而说话类型学视角为我们处理这个艰苦供给了一个办法。固然，我们不会无邪地以为一切的艰苦都能获得处理，然则我们至多有了一个较为合适的实际框架来比较汉语和法语，这些艰苦的处理也至多有了一些能够的门路或办法。 Abstract: There are more than 5000 kinds of talk in the world, that is to say, there are about 5000 different kinds of speech system. It is necessary to think about the two no blood relationship, there is no history of disputes between X and Y whether there will be a point of cooperation. In fact, all the talk is on the outside, but in reality, there is a personality, which is the actual basis of the study of the theory of speech. The discipline of the invention of the variation of the speech picture, points out the limitation of this kind of variation, which is the result of the research on the type of speech and the scholar's concern of the speaking character. The speech typology is considered as one of the research objects, it not only studies the existing speech, also discuss the modern speech. There is no doubt that the study of speech typology also stopped altogether. All of this makes it an analysis of the evolution of speech, the limits of personality and variation. In addition, typology is for "all human beings speak". It is more close to the popular talk, it is the purpose of all kinds of talk through the process of talking to the operation of the discipline. Through the process of learning to speak, we can put the Chinese and French in a more general and more general research framework to review. The theme of this article, on the one hand, is to study the coordination between Chinese and French, the other is to study the variation of the two, special is to find out the variation in the outside of the discipline and restrictions. We first do not Yacha two talking talking picture, and then create two talking personality and differences, and then test stop on the efficacy. Of course, this is all in the perspective of the type of speech. The goal of this paper is to compare the Chinese and French speaking system, and provide some practical basis for the task of teaching and speaking. Of course, the important point of the study of speech typology is the personality and variation between different speech, but there are many angles of research. Robin is the sum of speech types and phoneme types, syntactic type and semantic types. In reality, there should be a text type and so on. However, this paper can not put all the content are included, only choose one category of Chinese and French from the point of view of the comparative study. Syntax type is the focus of the type of research department, including a lot of research content. This paper's research is important in the size of the grammar type. The first chapter is a brief description of the growth of the type of speech Han Qing, introduction to the study of the types of speech in one of the most important research approach: to establish a relationship. The second chapter is the analysis of the two fundamental theories of grammar in Chinese and French. In the third chapter, the different level of study and shape of inflectional affixes. Anything else, but also recall the shape classification of traditional typology, this basically, measure the integration degree and the comprehensive degree. The fourth chapter through the process of the three most important syntactic components of subject, verb and object, discusses the small word order. Comment on the fundamental order of debate between Chinese and French, but also makes the analysis of topic sentence structure. The fifth chapter studies Chinese and French phrase level order. Three important phrases: word order of noun phrases, prepositional phrases, verb phrases. The noun phrase contains a noun focus and all kinds of modifiers (demonstrative, description etc.). Verb phrase contains a verb focus and various types of adverbial (adverbs, etc.). The preposition phrase contains the focus of the preposition and the noun. This article is an important analysis of the three phrases in Chinese and French personality, which is exactly the kind of speech to learn the attention of. In fact, it is difficult to compare the Chinese and French, which has not been so good, and the perspective of the study of speech has provided a way for us to deal with this difficult situation. Course, we are not so naive as to thought everything can be hard to get treatment, however, we at least have a practical framework for more appropriate to compare the Chinese and French, these hard processing also at least the some possible opportunities or way. 目录: |
