| 评价在外语教授教养中占领非常主要的位置。它同时对说话进修者起指点感化，对决议计划者起参考感化。我们在停止外语教授教养评价时，会见临一系列的成绩：甚么是评价？评价和测试有甚么分歧？我们应当若何公平的评价一位外语进修者？由谁来完成评价？我们评价的尺度有哪些？我们评价的内容是甚么？评价的手腕有哪些？若何搜集评价中发生的各类数据用于指点教授教养和改良教授教养评价？这一系列的成绩值得每位法语教授教养任务者深刻思虑。今朝，中公法语教授教养界缺少一个客不雅迷信的评价体系，评价方面的研究也绝对罕有。欧洲说话配合参考框架作为浩瀚国度配合运用的评价参考系统，法语毕业论文，在评价方面提出了一些非常有价值的概念和操作办法论。我们在对国际法语系说话进修者停止评价时，可以从中汲取有价值的部门，联合中国教授教养的详细情形，赓续对本身的教授教养和评价停止连续改良。这就是我们的研究重点存眷这个参考对象的缘由。本项研究分为三个部门。第一章重要存眷评价的概念和国际在研究评价和现实停止评价操作时存在的成绩。紧接着，第二章用较年夜篇幅对法语系教授教养现行年夜纲和欧洲说话配合参考框架停止定性比较研究，以期找出他们在评价理念、评价尺度、评价手腕等方面的差异。第三章起首联合第二章的内容，剖析在国际应用欧洲说话配合参考框架指点评价的需要性和可行性。接着，第三章提出了一些详细的理念和办法，商量欧洲说话配合参考框架在中国特色的教授教养情况下的应用。我们的得出的结论以下：欧洲说话配合参考框架可以或许用来改良中国的评价系统。然则，在它的可顺应性被中国的实际磨练之前，直接在与欧洲说话教授教养情况年夜相径庭的配景中应用这一对象是一种非常有风险的行动。在一个“年夜数据”风行的时期，信息技巧可认为搜集评价数据供给有用支撑。国际的评价系统可以依附在中国收集的数据作为支持，研究欧洲说话配合参考框架的中国化，对中国的教授教养和评价停止连续改良。 Abstract: Evaluation in foreign language teaching in the occupation of a very important position. It also pointing effect on language learners, the decision makers play a reference role. We met with a series of achievements in the assessment of foreign language teaching and education, what is the evaluation? What are the differences between evaluation and testing? What should we do to evaluate a foreign language learner? Who will finish the evaluation? We evaluate the scale of what? What is the content of our evaluation? Evaluation of the wrist what? How to collect all kinds of data in the evaluation of the data used to guide teaching and improve the teaching evaluation? This series of results is worth every French teaching task deeply thought. At present, in the middle of the public French teaching profession is the lack of a guest's evaluation system, evaluation aspects of the study is absolutely rare. "European speak with reference frame" as the vast country with the application of the evaluation system, in the evaluation of some of the very valuable concepts and operational methods. We in the specialty of international French language learners to stop evaluation, can learn from the valuable department, combined with Chinese teaching in detail, ceaselessly to the teaching and evaluation of stop continuous improvement. This is the reason why we focus on the reference object. This study is divided into three departments. The first chapter is about the concept of critical evaluation and the achievements of the international research on the evaluation of the evaluation and the reality of the evaluation. Immediately. In the second chapter, by compared with the length of the eve of the French professional teaching current "the eve of the outline and the European talk with frame of reference" qualitative comparative study, in order to find out their similarities and differences in the concept of evaluation, evaluation scale, evaluation means. The third chapter first combine the contents of the second chapter, analyze the need and feasibility of the international application of the "European talk with reference framework". Then, the third chapter puts forward some detailed ideas and methods, to discuss the use of the European talk and reference frame in the teaching situation of Chinese characteristics. Our conclusions are as follows: "the European speaking and reference frame" can be used to improve China's evaluation system. However, it can conform is China's practical training before directly in the and Europe speaking teaching situation of the eve of the phase different background using this object is a very risky action. In a "big data" popular period, information technology can be considered to provide useful support to collect evaluation data. The international evaluation system can be attached to the data collected in China as a support, the study of "European talk with reference frame" of China, the Chinese teaching and evaluation of the teaching of continuous improvement. 目录: |
