| 本文由引言、注释和结论三部门组成。引言部门经由过程阐述未成年人刑事司法研究的主要性、以后学术中存在的两种极端化研究范式、我国未成年人刑事司法轨制中存在的缺点、未成年人刑事司法国际准则具有严重研究价值而相干研究又存在严重缺乏，解释了本文研究的主要意义。未成年人刑事司法国际准则研究应采取“刑事一体化”研究范式，综合运用多种研究办法。注释部门分为5章：第1章“刑事与福利之间：‘少年司法’的窘境及其前途”。指出“少年司法”研究中一些重要术语的运用较为凌乱，界定了这些术语的内在，厘清了他们之间的关系，主意将未成年刑事司法实用对象重要称之为“未成年人”，将其所调剂行动领域重要称之为“严重不良行动”和“犯法行动”，将调剂未成年人这两种行动领域的司法轨制称之为“未成年人刑事司法轨制”。国度亲权实际一向被奉为少年司法的根本实际，固然它为少年司法的成长做出了伟大进献，然则它在逻辑上和理论中存在着保护未成年人权益和侵占未成年人权益的悖论，法语论文题目，应依据有关国际准则对其停止改革。经由过程对典范国度少年司法轨制的考核，指出列国的少年司法轨制素来都是多元的，不存在相对福利或刑事形式的状态，涌现少年司法形式之争的本源在于将未成年人的本分歧质的成绩同质化。不管在逻辑上照样依据有关国际准则，都应将未成年人严重不良行动和犯法作为一个领域来对待。第2章“未成年人刑事司法国际准则的架构与法理”。二战前，历次国际科罚及牢狱会议所经由过程的有关未成年人守法犯法成绩的决定是未成年人刑事司法国际准则的起始，它固然存在缺乏和局限，然则为二战后未成年人刑事司法国际准则的构成奠基了汗青性的基本。二战后未成年人刑事司法国际准则获得敏捷成长，法语论文，并终究构成，它由国际条约、结合国年夜会同意的司法文件和结合国的有关组织和国际学术集团经由过程的决定构成，其内容丰硕而复杂，具有四年夜特点。储藏个中的实际重要是科罚个体化实际和儿童权力论。第3章“未成年人刑事司法国际准则中的根本准绳”。归结剖析了未成年人刑事司法国际准则中所包括的准绳：处遇个体化准绳、非刑化准绳、教导准绳、对等准绳、保证未成年人诉讼权力原、专门化准绳、配合介入准绳等，个中对前两个准绳作了重点阐述。第4章“未成年人刑事司法国际准则中的主要实体系体例度”和第5章“未成年人刑事司法国际准则中的主要法式轨制”。依据未成年人刑事司法国际准则中的主要而又特别的规矩、以后我国未成年人刑事司法中存在的缺点，分离重点商量了个中的八个主要实体和法式轨制：未成年人刑事义务年纪轨制、掩护处罚轨制、社区改正轨制、未成年人前科祛除轨制、适合成年人介入轨制、社会查询拜访轨制、转处轨制、未成年人恢复性司法轨制等，指出了我国在这些轨制方面的缺点，并提出了响应的建构或完美建议。结论部门总结了对于未成年人刑事司法的五年夜根本结论：它应将严重不良行动和犯法行动一体化、是掩护与处分的一体化、是社会和司法的一体化、应具有多元性。我国应当以未成年人刑事司法国际准则为尺度，联合我国的详细国情，制订专门的未成年人刑事司法法，以更好地保护守法犯法未成年人的权益。 Abstract: This paper consists of three parts: introduction, comment and conclusion. Introduction departments through the process described not adult criminal justice research, after academic in the presence of two extreme research paradigm, our juvenile criminal justice system in the existing shortcomings and minor international criminal justice principles with serious research value and relevant research and there is a serious lack of, explains the purpose of this paper is to study the main significance. Juvenile criminal justice international principles should be taken "criminal integration" research paradigm, the comprehensive application of a variety of research methods. The comment section is divided into 5 chapters: the first chapter "criminal and welfare: the dilemma and future of juvenile justice". Pointed out that the "juvenile justice" research in some key terms used more messy, defines the inherent in these terms, to clarify the relationship between them, the idea will be minor criminal judicial practical important objects known as "minor", adjust important areas of action called for "serious adverse action" and "crime", adjustment will not adults this two kinds of action in the field of judicial rail system known as "minor criminal justice system". National paternity actual has always been regarded as the basic theory for the administration of juvenile justice, although it is the growth of the juvenile justice made great contribution. However, it in logic and theory exist unprotected minor rights and interests and occupation not minor rights and interests of the paradox, should according to relevant international principles on the reform. Through the process of model national juvenile justice system assessment, and points out that the nations of the juvenile justice system has always been diverse and there is no relative welfare or criminal forms of state and juvenile justice form the origin of the emergence is not adults of the qualitative differences results homogenization. Whether in accordance with the logic of the relevant international principles, should be a serious crime of minors and the crime as a field to treat. The second chapter: the structure and legal principle of the international criminal justice principle". Before World War II, previous international penalty and prison meeting through process about Minors law-abiding illegal performance decision is not adults international criminal justice principles starting. No doubt it has lack and limitation. However after World War II minors international criminal justice principles laid the history of the basic. After World War II minors international criminal justice principles obtained rapid growth, and eventually formed, it by international treaties, the United Nations General Assembly agreed to the judicial documents and combined with the relevant organizations and international academic group through the decision process constitute, its content is rich and complex, with four big characteristics. The actual storage is important for individual children and the actual penalty power theory. The third chapter: the basic principle of the international criminal justice principle". Resolution analysis not adults international criminal justice principles, including the principle: treatment individualization principle, depenalization principle, teaching principle, the principle of reciprocity, ensure minors litigation right, specialization principle, combined with interventional principle etc., medium of the first two principles are discussed in this paper. The fourth chapter "the main body system degree" and the fifth chapter "the international principle of juvenile criminal justice" and "juvenile criminal justice" international principle of the main French system". On the basis of juvenile criminal justice in international principles of important and special rules, after our juvenile criminal justice exists shortcomings, separation focus to discuss the eight major entities of the medium and the French rail system: not adult criminal responsibility age rail system, cover punishment rail system, community correction rail system, not the minor criminal record eliminate rail system, suitable for adults rail system and social inquiry visit rail system, rail system, the minor restoration justice rail system and participate in the, points out the shortcomings in the rail system in our country, and puts forward the response of the structure or perfect proposal. Conclusion part gives a summary about no adult criminal justice of five of the eve of the fundamental conclusions: it should be the serious adverse action and illegal action integration, cover and action of the integration, is the social and legal integration, diversity. Our country should take the juvenile criminal justice international principle as the standard, the United Nations of China's specific national conditions, the development of a special "juvenile criminal justice law", in order to better protect the rights and interests of minors. 目录: |
