Style is the main part of premises management system political system; Russia has outstanding area and national achievement. Start from the above two points, the Russian premises management system has important research value. Because in the past to the result value is not enough, current research faces must be hard, not only there is no special papers and books, is Russian historiography circle for this study is not much, component of the monograph is very few, if this paper can be of some value, because the in this. The main purpose of the paper is to outline the former Russian governance system in the end of the premises. Because the constitution of local governance systems resolution significance, the fundamental along the constitution change longitudinal open. At the same time, the administrative division, organization establishment, instinct function allocation, personnel and equipment, coherent regulations rules and autonomous status for each stage of change of place management system the main goal of the assessment. Country premises management system to form the same country as a condition, with the same intermediate and the domestic and foreign policies of Russia in fifteenth Century at the start, as we know Russian governance system. 15 - sixteenth Century interim premises management system management system can be described as premises aristocratic period. Moscow Nianye association is and the hereditary aristocracy share of state power, the latter in the territory control local governance, independent exercise of military, judicial and tax etc. all kinds of performance. Country zoning messy Shi Yi system as the important place of the governance situation. The middle of the sixteenth Century to seventeenth Century during the first half of a premises management system to grade representative period. Through the process of cultivating small nobility, the Tsar of the eve of the hereditary aristocracy rights gradually accept center, hence beginning to the local governance system style groping. Prior to the 17th century, Shi Yi of fundamental is to get rid of. To local community organizations to place an important governance mechanism, various types of zoning the same for the county. Gentry meeting through the process of "new law" to stop the premises management standard. Tsar stopped the experiment of two premises Governance: bondage, in premises management system is only broken can not stand; Kazan systems, premises management system in terms of far-reaching significance. During the first half of the 17th century, grade monarchy on behalf of deepening promotion center, the authority, the Tsar Kazan systems implementation to the frontier, governance around the yield to the governor and the governor under the jurisdiction of the institutions, overseers by bureaucratic appointments, monitor and guide the locative officially became center right sequence level. The second half of the seventeenth Century to nineteenth Century during the first half of a premises management system relative to the monarchy period. During the late 17th century and half relative monarchy is poised to take off, premises management system also in quietly changed in discharge leakage comprehensive transformation of the message. Overseers of the rising sun to grow, bureaucratic overseers of the overall has been extremely the force, in the original military basically was born to collect the Nianye area. The district offers financial and administrative institutions, the centralized military, administrative and financial governance, is thought to be the predecessor of the province. The center of power in the border region agency action is strengthened, the receiving of Yamen affairs area has the significance of the provincial authorities. Relative to the monarchy in eighteenth Century formally established, and continuously to the first half of nineteenth Century. Because the highest right belongs to the monarchy, Tsar of local governance systems influence unprecedented plus Nianye or new plans, or continue to repair, local governance systems in frequent changes to complete. Peter there will be national planning at province, prefecture and county level, set up the response of the administrative, judicial and economic governance institutions, personnel and equipment bias on the right to, all governance institutions and personnel are unclear instinct division of function and more stringent monitoring affiliated relations. But there is a weak autonomy. Peter Thi on the premises of comprehensive governance transformation must the overall framework of the Russian premises management system, and then the tsars are in the growth and stability of Peter Thi transformation results. Yekaterina II, part of the swap premises management. Yekaterina II announced the "Russian Empire province government office", which opened a new round of reform of the governance. Population scale of provincial, county zoning from the new resolution, the judiciary independent system and in enhancing the governance mechanism of police officers instinct function at the same time set up the scope of the eve of the police agencies. Enhanced autonomous city. The transformation of Russian premises management system to the crux of the mature stage. Paul era premises governance systems devoid of tricks, too much emphasis on traditional Russian style system of bad. Alexandria a reign of basic recovery the ekarepha II era premises governance systems, at the beginning of the reign of Israeli tun of aggravated the premises management system has long been the militarization of bias. The time of Nicola I, except officers, governance mechanism must be serious, premises management system basically to the previous stage of the criterion. The second half of the nineteenth Century, style of governance system with authoritarian system where the capitalist color cast. On the basis of "autonomy Reform Ordinance" opened premises governance reform, become autonomous style premises governance system the most prominent features of this period of time. Local judicial system experience serious change, the police grasp of the premises more careful. In early nineteenth Century the Russian Revolution rule all fall into the shadow. Local autonomy and judicial affairs were improved, the abnormal situation in the cover. After the Russian constitution into the constitutional monarchy, style premises governance system growth on track. The extreme to be withdrawn, in place in the role of autonomous governance strengthen again. After the February revolution premises set up administrative organization of the new premises, the judicial officers, change institutions have become autonomous organs, bureau of premises. Most of the vast Russian "location" has the attribute of national style, premises governance system includes national governance system of the special content. Was annexed in minority areas of governance systems at a to the country as a whole premises management system as the background, after all, there is no one do not integrate into the background, and in the process, Russia in the ethnic minority areas have separate implementation of the various autonomous. Before the age of empires, autonomy is not systematic; age of empires, all regional governance systems constitute the contains administrative autonomy and political autonomy, cover the Lord Protector, the complete system. Establish a system of governance style and practice includes two aspects as always and political skills. In the Russian premises management system running every historical era, there are significant technical change or big or small. Political change ordinary little direct detailed performance content in the system, it is through the process of accumulation of skill change to reach their goals. Governance of premises the appraisal of Russian 400 years in the style of system control is comparable to the victory of the, from the skill, it beat hinder Russia become an organic whole; from politics, it is right to constitute the centralization. About a Fengkai country? 目录: |
