| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 普通以为，新批驳强调经由过程运用文本细读法来发明文学著作是若何作为自力、自我指涉的审美客体而运作的。因为它试图反拨传统的文学研究措施，尽力凸显文学研究本质，否决将读者反响、作者意图和汗青文明配景和品德研究与文学研究混为一谈，一些批驳家如特里林曾批驳这类批驳手段“抛弃汗青，俄语毕业论文，毫无往代认识”。新批驳也是以在文学研究界历久被以为是一种典范的缺少汗青认识的批驳派别。但是，卖力考核新批驳汗青，剖析其重要的批驳家及批驳文本，我们发明，那种以为“新批驳”派实际家画地为牢，与汗青社会相脱节并全盘向内成长的意见是值得商议的。“新批驳”文学研究并不是完整摈弃汗青、局限于文本以内。现实上，不管从实际主意照样批驳理论来看，新批驳都具有比拟显著的汗青认识。本论文力争从多个层面论证新批驳的汗青认识。起首，从实际层面看，经由过程对一些重要新批驳家如艾略特、韦勒克和布鲁克斯的相干阐述的卖力勘探对比，发明个中都凸起表达了汗青/传统关心，俄语毕业论文，因此说新批驳实际完整拒却汗青、抛弃传统，至多是没有周全剖析的成果。然后，经由过程详细剖析三位的批驳理论包含艾略特的《但丁》和《本·琼生》，韦勒克的《近代文学批驳史》和布鲁克斯的《马维尔的《贺拉斯颂》》，证实三者在文学批驳理论中异样重视汗青认识。最初，论文从汗青认识方面比拟剖析了新批驳与俄国情势主义，指出虽然二者都是情势主义的，然则新批驳却没有忘却汗青与传统，而这恰是分歧于俄国情势主义文论的地方。基于上述剖析，论文最初总结：虽然学术界普通以为“新批驳”与汗青脱节、缺少汗青认识，但如若细查新批驳的实际及批驳理论，我们发明工作绝非如斯，乃至可以用韦勒克的话来归纳综合，就是：新批驳在本身的研究中简直采取了一个全然汗青性的纲领，随时吐露出的都是很强的汗青认识。 Abstract: Think commonly, the new criticism stressed through the process of application of close reading of the text to create literary works is how as a self, self reference related to the aesthetic object and operation. Because it attempts to backwash the traditional literature research methods, try to highlight the essence of literature research, would veto the reader's response, the intention of the author and history civilization with scene and character research and literature research confused, some criticism such as trilling has refuted the criticism means "abandon history, no to the generation of knowledge". The new criticism is to be thought in literature research for a long time is a typical lack of understanding of the history of criticism of factions. But hard assessment of the new criticism history, analyzes the important criticism and criticism of the text, we invented that "New Criticism" to send the actual home go to prison, and social and historical disjointed and overall inward growth of opinion is worth consulting. The "New Criticism" literature research is not completely abandoned history, limited to text within. In fact, regardless of the actual idea still criticism theory, new criticism has more significant historical understanding. This thesis strive to from the angle of demonstration of a new history of knowledge criticism. First and foremost, on a practical level, through the process of some important new criticism at home, such as Eliot, Wellek and brooks of coherent states of hard exploration and comparison, invention medium bumps expressed the historical / traditional care, so that new criticism actual complete refused, but history, abandon the traditional, at least there is no comprehensive analysis of the results. Then, through detailed analysis of three of the criticism of the theory contains Eliot's "Dante" and "Ben Jonson", Wellek's the modern literary criticism history of brooks and the marvel of the Horace song "" confirmed three met in the literary criticism theory in strange attention blue sweat. Initially, the from the historical understanding aspects comparative analysis of the new criticism and Russian formalism, and points out that although both are formalism, however new criticism did not forget history and tradition. But this is exactly the differences in Russian Formalism Literary Theory. Based on the above analysis, the initial summary: Although academic circles generally think "New Criticism" and historical disjointed, lack of awareness of the history, but if scrutinize new criticism practice and criticism theory, we find that the work is not so, and even in Wellek's words to sum up is: the new criticism in their research could take the a complete history of program, at any time to reveal is a strong history of understanding. 目录: |
