| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，俄语论文，俄语毕业论文，内容请直接查看目录。） 我国《刑事诉讼法》第七条明白划定“法院、审查院、公安机关停止刑事诉讼,应该分工担任、相互合营、相互制约,以包管精确有用地履行司法。”但我国事否经由过程《刑事诉讼法》中的详细条则落实了这一准绳请求呢?比拟中俄两国的《刑事诉讼法》,我们会发明两个国度对于法官与审查官多项职责划分的划定存在很年夜的差别。这些差别值得我们去深刻思虑个中的缘由。经由过程对差别发生缘由的剖析,我们可以或许为我国未来刑事诉讼司法的完美积聚更多的经历。《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》(以下简称《俄联邦刑事诉讼法》)是在2001年11月由俄罗斯联邦国度杜马经由过程的,之前俄罗斯一向沿用的是1960年失效的《苏俄刑事诉讼法典》。苏联崩溃后,俄罗斯的国度性质产生了基本的变更,但俄罗斯并没有立刻破除旧的《刑事诉讼法》,而是采用了一种郑重实施的立场。时隔12年后才在《俄罗斯联邦宪法》的指点下制订出《俄联邦刑事诉讼法》,该《刑事诉讼法》以国民诉讼权力和自在的保证为重要考量内容(诉讼准绳绝年夜多半都牵涉人权),并普遍自创了东方蓬勃国度的立法经历,司法条则用词严谨,构造系统完全。卖力思虑俄罗斯对于法官与审查官之间的权责划分将会带给我们许多启发,对更好地完成我公法官审讯中立、明白法院与审查院的各自权责、进步刑事诉讼的诉讼效力都具有很年夜的自创和参考价值。 Abstract: China's "Criminal Procedure Law" seventh to understand the delineation of the court, the court, the public security organs to stop the criminal proceedings, it should be the division of labor, mutual cooperation, mutual constraints, to ensure accurate and effective implementation of the judiciary." But I am not a state of the process of the "Criminal Procedure Law" in the details of the implementation of this principle, the comparison between China and Russia, the criminal procedure law, we will find the difference between the two countries on the division of a number of judges and the review of a number of responsibilities. These differences are worth our deep thinking. By analyzing the causes of the differences, we may be able to accumulate more experience in the future of criminal justice in China. "Russian Federal Criminal Procedure Law (hereinafter referred to as the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation) in November 2001 through the process, before Russia always use is expired in 1960 the Soviet Union code of criminal procedure," by the State Duma of the Russian Federation. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia's national nature has produced a basic change, but Russia did not immediately get rid of the old criminal procedure law, but the use of a solemn implementation of the position. After a lapse of 12 years in the Russian Federation constitution under the guidance of the formulation of the Russian federal criminal procedure law, the criminal procedure law to the national power and freedom of the guarantee for the important considerations (most of the legal proceedings are involved in human rights), and generally created the eastern countries of the legislative experience, the judiciary is the use of rigorous, structural system. Hard to think about the division of powers between the judges and the review of the review will give us a lot of inspiration, the better to complete the trial neutrality of the judge, the court and the review of their respective powers, the progress of the proceedings of the criminal proceedings are very large and reference value. 目录: 摘要 4 绪论 6-8 第一章 俄罗斯法院与检察院概述 8-15 第一节 俄罗斯法院概述 8-12 一、法院体系 8-10 二、俄罗斯刑事诉讼中的法官 10-12 第二节 俄罗斯检察机关概述 12-15 一、检察机关 12-13 二、俄罗斯刑事诉讼中的检察长 13-15 第二章 中俄法院与检察院权责划分的异同 15-20 第一节 行使特定侦查行为的许可权 15-17 第二节 强制方法适用的许可权 17-18 第三节 检察长回避的决定权 18-20 第三章 法院与检察院权责划分异同的思考与借鉴 20-24 第一节 刑事诉讼中人权与效率的位次考量 20-21 第二节 对于实现控辩结构平衡的思考 21-23 第三节 对互相配合、互相制约准则的思考 23-24 结束语 24-25 参考文献 25-27 致谢 27 |
