| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，俄语论文，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 平易近事诉权在平易近事诉讼范畴具有主要的位置，平易近事诉权实际的研究具有必定的难度。历久以来列国学者一向努力于对平易近事诉权的研究，但是对平易近事诉权至今没构成同一的定论。俄罗斯对平易近事诉权的研究，不管在实际上照样在司法轨制上都有其先辈性也有其缺乏的地方。对俄罗斯平易近事诉权实际的成长和详细诉权保证轨制的研究，加倍完全地表现了俄罗斯平易近事诉权成长状态，借以汲取其先辈的地方，完美缺乏的地方，这将为我公民事诉权实际的进一步成长供给主要的参考价值，同时也弥补了我国专门研究俄罗斯平易近事诉权的空白。 Abstract: The right of civil action has the main position in the civil litigation. The practical discussion of the civil right has certain difficulty. Since long-term nations scholars always trying to research on the plain near thing right, but to civilian right has not the same conclusion. The study of the right to appeal of civil rights, in fact, still in the judicial system, there is also a lack of its predecessors. On Russian civilian right of real growth and with the right guarantee rail system research, double completely the Russian civilian right of state, to learn from their predecessors, the lack of perfect place, which will the practice of civil public litigation further into long supply important reference value, but also for the special research in our country in Russia's recent action blank. 目录: 中文摘要 1-2 |
