| 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文分导言、注释和结论三个部门。导言部门对本文主题即“辩解”作了诠释，俄语论文网站，指出从以下四个层面上对俄罗斯辩解轨制停止研究：辩解是一种诉讼行动或运动，俄语论文题目，是原告人或其辩解人针对指控停止辩驳和辩护的诉讼运动或行动；辩解是一种诉讼本能机能，是以辩驳控告为内容，并与控告本能机能绝对立、反抗的诉讼本能机能；辩解权是一项诉讼权力，即司法付与犯法嫌疑人、原告人针对指控停止辩驳和辩护和取得辩解人赞助的权力；辩解轨制，是由司法划定的对于辩解权及其完成措施和辩解权的司法保证等一整套的轨制和办法。注释由四部门内容组成，前三部门对十月反动前的辩解轨制、苏俄时代的辩解轨制和俄罗斯联邦的辩解轨制停止了汗青考核。从汗青成长的轨迹来看，自现代罗斯国度的构成，至十月反动前，俄罗斯的“辩解轨制”阅历了控告式诉讼中辩解的萌芽，到纠问式诉讼中辩解本能机能的萎缩和灭亡，再到混和式诉讼中近代辩解轨制的构成和确立的成长进程。苏维埃政权成立后，开端了创设社会主义辩解轨制的摸索，在立法上周全划定了包管原告人辩解权的准绳、辩解权的完成措施、辩解人的规模及其委任、辩解人介入诉讼、辩解人的权力和责任等外容，使俄罗斯辩解轨制慢慢完美并日益国际化。苏联崩溃今后，价值不雅念产生了基本改变，其司法轨制业作了响应调剂，但并未宣布原本的司法掉去效率。俄罗斯联邦对苏俄辩解轨制停止了继续与成长，重要表示为在刑事诉讼中增强犯法嫌疑人、刑事原告人的权力保证、强化辩解本能机能，特殊是新刑事诉讼法典的公布和实行，使俄罗斯辩解轨制成长到了一个新的阶段。注释第四部门从辩解权及其保证、司法支援、辩解人加入刑事诉讼的时光、被刑事控诉者与律师的会面权、律师的阅卷权、律师的平易近事和刑事宽免权、律师职务机密准绳、律师的谢绝辩解权等八个方面临现行俄罗斯辩解轨制与结合国刑事司法准则停止了比拟研究。结论部门是经由过程对俄罗斯辩解轨制的汗青考核和与国际通行的辩解轨制停止比拟研究所得出的根本不雅点。以为俄罗斯现行的辩解轨制根本相符现今结合国刑事辩解司法准则的请求，但有些处所仍存在一些差距。 Abstract: This paper is divided into three sections: introduction, comment and conclusion. The Department of the theme of "excuse" explains, pointed out that the research on the Russian Defense System from the following four aspects: excuse is an action or movement, is the plaintiff or the people excuse and defend against the allegations against stop action movement or action; explanation is a kind of litigation function is to refute charges, content, and absolute performance against legislation, and accused the lawsuit function; defense right is a procedural power, namely judicial give the suspect, the plaintiff accused for stop and defend and justify rebuttal sponsor authority; excuse system is defined by the judicial explanation about right and complete method and judicial explanation right guarantee system and measures. Annotation is composed of four parts, before the third sector before the October Revolution argue that rail system, the Soviet Union era of excuse rail system of the Russian Federation and excuse rail system stopped history examination. From historical development trajectory, from the composition of the nation of modern Ross, before the October Revolution, Russia's "excuse track system experience against sprout type lawsuit excuse, to inquisitorial litigation defense instinct function of shrink and die, again to the mixed type of litigation in modern defense solution rail system and the establishment of the growth process. The establishment of the Soviet regime after the beginning of creating socialist excuse rail system of exploration, in legislation comprehensive delineation of the guarantee plaintiff argued that in principle, explanation right method, argued that the scale and appointment, argued that involved in litigation, argued that the power and responsibility and capacity, make Russia excuse rail system gradually perfect and the growing internationalization. The collapse of the Soviet Union in the future, the value of the concept of a fundamental change in the judicial system, its response to the adjustment of the system, but did not announce the original judicial efficiency. Russian Federation for the Soviet defence rail system to stop the continuing and growing important representation in the criminal procedure enhance the crime suspect, the criminal defendant's power to guarantee, strengthening the function of defense instinct, especially the new criminal procedure code published and implemented, the Russian Defense rail system has grown to a new stage. Notes the fourth department from debating solution and guarantee of rights, judicial support, argued that adding time of criminal procedure, criminal charges and the lawyer's meeting, right to an attorney's reading right, lawyers for civilian and criminal wide excused, lawyer duty confidential principle, lawyers declined explanation right of the eight Pro current Russian Defense rail system and criminal judicial principle which combines a comparative study. Conclusion the Department is through the process of Russia's defense system of the historical examination and with the international passage of the system to stop the analogy of the basic point of view of the study. The current defense system in Russia is in line with the request of the modern criminal law principle, but there are still some gaps in some places. 目录: |
