Russia started in twentieth Century 90 years of the system transformation is a multi category, the system of institutional changes in the process. Further the effect of the transition of the one is completely transformed the traditional Russian style system highly centralized omnipotent state management form, and prompted the government, market and society in the respective external institutional structure and the coupling relationship between the intense reconstruction. Although the conservatives reform attempts to comply with the new liberal strategic transformation, in Russia's quick to establish "country under the rule of law, market economy and civil society" trinity of ancient country management form, but actually annotations to govern the country form evolution process of unusually complex and bending. Under Boris Yeltsin, Russia's conservative institutional change has not happened Neo liberal restructuring expected strategy consequences, but fall into a kind of "order break" state management form of rail of trap and stimulate the national order of serious disorder and social economic continuous recession. After Putin's ruling, in maintaining market and plain near the main of fundamental bias conditions, on Russia's national management form stopped serious adjustment, the focus is to build a strong authority as the breakthrough point, and the response of the rail system reform measures market and integration of social culture. This prompted Russia to break from the dispensing order order of integration, social and economic growth performance was improved slowly. In spite of this, Russia has not yet formed a solid and useful form of national management, the state of Russia's management form is still in the further evolution of the situation. In this paper, the economics basically created other coherent discipline research results, constructs the analytical framework of a composed of government market civil society three of the eve of the rail system elements of country management form, and the application of this framework to Russian state management form evolution pathway analysis. On this basis, on Russia's rail system transformation process, and order management and social economic growth performance given with reasonable and comprehensive explanation, and from that of some of the countries in transition rail system transformation and the ancient kingdom of management form construction has the inspiration significance. The research contents and frame structure following control: the first chapter is the full text of the introduction, consists of three parts: (1) the interpretation of "the Russian transition puzzle" from the start, puts forward significance of the evolution of the research of the Russian state management form; (2) of related theory and history research carding and summary; (3) the important contents, research methods and innovation points as brief introduction. The second chapter is the analysis framework of this paper. This chapter takes the new system economics as an important practical object and combined with other relevant practice to analyze the evolution of Russian national management form a practical analysis framework. The framework defines the form of national management as a system of institutional structure, which is composed of the government, the market and the national society. The above three major rail system to cooperate with each other to maintain the country's order management and promote social and economic growth. Application of this framework and the historical reality of the United States to discuss the evolution of the form of national management discipline and the need to build the premise of discipline. The third chapter discuss the important Russian national management form the evolution of the historical background and the actual destination, important contents include three aspects: (1) summarized and summarized the basic characteristics of the traditional Russian political, economic and social system structure and its evolution of national management form path dependence effect; (2) the description and analysis of the former the universal form of country management process, basic characteristics and operation mechanism, summed up and remind the universal humanitarian country crisis management situation and the form and connotation of said mechanism; (3) ways to influence the evolution and application of transformation of the political and economic cycle model of the former Soviet Union and the transformation of the research on land management form evolution. The fourth chapter analysis Boris Yeltsin, the rail system change brought to the Russian authorities, market system and social structure influence and Boris Yeltsin, the forms of state management summarized comprehensive "order break" state management, one of the most important characteristics of the expressed as: (1) weak authority management form; (2) distorted rail system transformation and messy market economic order; (sharp differentiation of social and immature citizen society. From three levels of government, market and social crisis management to strengthen each other, making the Russian experience the continuous state order messy, so as to reduce the transformation of the economic recession. The fifth chapter is an important analysis of the Putin administration's adjustment and its impact on the Russian state management. Putin administration to govern the country in the form of adjustment in order to build a strong authority as a starting point. On this basic on the a series of coherent ways to transform, to training standard operation of the market economic system and integrate break social structure. The strategic adjustment to urge Russia country order from a ruptured and turmoil to integration and stability and promote the national economy from recession to recovery and growth. In view of this, this article will be the Putin period of Russia's initial form of national management form called "order integration" type of national management form. The sixth chapter consists of three aspects: (1) the historical track of the evolution of the Russian national management form is stopped and the actual interpretation is summarized. 目录: |
